[Sheet attached to xxxvi. 101]

Thoughts on Economy as applied to Office - or Constitut Code.

14 Apr. 1822

Preference in favour of the powerful and rich - the Causes.

Virtue as height in the scales of power and opulence directly. Cause of this error

1. Power of do as instruments of corruption. They procure false evidence in [...?] affirmation of excellence. Patrons obtain groundless laud of Clients

2. Power of do as instruments of fascination

3. De mortuis nil nisi bonum: its influence on biography: biography is eulogium: the biographized belong to the ruling few: bonum mortuis is bonum vivis [...?]

4. By small expence in proportion to income the rich obtain great laud for beneficence: by encrease of maleficence on a large scale they obtain reputation of benevolence

5. Rich sole customers of artists: hence artists slaves and panegyrists of the rich

6. Notice that in political discussion it is injurious to impute bad motives: ie to predicate self-preference. Yes: to impute these exclusively to A. or B: not if there were no ill-grounded laud[?]. Not injurious if imputed to them in common with all public men: nor, while the habit of ascribing special excellence to A and B. continues.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1820 Feb. 16 Radicalism not dangerous]
    Description: 1820 Feb. 16

    Radicalism not dangerous

    III. Experience

    II. Ireland

    3

    If felicity in fiction be not equivalent to felicity in fact, Britain is not a country Ireland is not a country in which any such felicity in any such shape as alledged has place and therefore on this supposition, the alledged excellence vanishes. If felicity in fiction is an equivalent for felicity in fact, then neither on this supposition has any such excellence place. For in fiction the existence popular representation, dependence of alledged representatives on alledged constituents, conformity of the proceedings of those representative to the wishes and thence to the interests of those constituents is just as easily affected as of Great Britain and Ireland, and might at any time be affected with as much veracity /entire sincerity/ and sincerity in the one case as it is or can be in the other.

    From truths may either truth or falshood flow /come/ /or truth or falshood may ensue /accrue//

    From falshood nought but falshood ever can flow /can ensue/.

    In this couplet in addition to rhyme may be seen though not poetry, what is somewhat better worth than fiction in that or any other shape, sound reason: reason applicable to whatsoever subjects are in relation to human happiness most important. The original come last from Bishop Saunderson Bishop of Lincoln /one of Charles the first Bishops/ in his Logical compend, but of all compends of the current logic Bishop Saunderson who with this or any other useful matter would have thought over and again in his head ere he would have let it fly, /would no more have let it fly than any Archbishop of Canterbury or Bishop of London would/ had he been prophet enough to have seen /foreseen/ that any such use as this would have been made of it.

    Ex veris virtute[?], falsumque aliquando sequitur

    Ex falsis poterunt nil nisi falsa sequi

    + in /of the case of/ Spain, or Morocco, or in Bambarra
  • Title: [15 Oct r 1809 + '.2. Continued Parl]
    Description: 15 Oct r 1809 + '.2. Continued

    Parl y Reform

    {Ch.}1. Explan

    {'.}/Ch./2. Influence on understanding

    Instruments of fascination

    11

    1

    9

    Influence the deceptitious[?] viz. by instruments of fascination is still influences of understanding on understanding ends[?]

    through the medium of the imagination

    Instruments[?] of fascination[?] chiefly [...?] an indication of peculiar qualities moral or intellectual.

    In virtue of the well known principle of association - of the faculty that any two ideas that on former occasions have been present together in the mind, have of introducing each other on subsequent occasions, the imagination is apt to be wrought upon, and frequently with great force, by sensible objects of different classes, and more particularly by visible ones. In so far as the influence thus exerted on it by these objects is regarded as excessive, or as operating in a wrong direction, causing /so as to cause or tend to cause/ the imagination to lead the judgment into wrong conclusions, the objects which act in this manner on the imagination may be termed instruments of fascination.

    To this head belong the several sensible material symbols by which in almost all countries the different classes and ranks and classes of men have come to be distinguished: in England the crown and sceptre of the King, the coronet of the Peer the star of the Knight, the uniform of the military officer, the robes and mass of artificial hair of the Judge and the Advocate - and so forth

    It is only indeed in so far as the influence they respectively have on the imagination and through the medium of the imagination on the judgment, has the effect of giving to the authority of their several /respective/ [...?] and liveries more weight in the scale of reasoning /argumentation/ than properly belongs to it, than any such appellations /name[?]/ /appellatives/ as fascination, instruments of fascination can, with propriety, be respectively applicable to them.
  • Title: [1819 Aug. 17 Fallacies 1 Forms]
    Description: 1819 Aug. 17

    Fallacies 1 Forms

    [4 Forms.]

    Forms. Another very convenient cloak for abuse and misgovernment - for foul spots of all sorts and sizes - is presented by the word forms - by the nebulosity of the word forms. /: a very paragon of nebulosity./

    By forms are meant either operations of government or instruments of government meaning written instruments, produced by correspondent operations: the living instruments of government - the members of the appropriate part of the Official Establishment being, in both cases, the operators.

    Now among these operations, productive or not /some productive, some not/ of corresponent instruments, there have doubtless been some good: but moreover, unless the official persons in question have been absolutely infllible and impeccable, some bad. It is required to reconcile men to the bad: to cause them to be regarded as good: this is the problem, how shall this problem /it/ be solved?

    Tale the individual operattion itself, and apply laud[?] to it, the danger is that the laud will not stick; and the more palpably undeserving of laud the operations is - in other words the more palpably deserving of reproach in a word the more palpably mischevious - the greater the difficulty of making /getting/ it to stick.