[xxxvi. 105]

1822 June 28

Constitut. Code Rationale

Supreme Operative

Monarch absolute and

limited

1. Morals

As in their own Monarch all subjects have an enemy so have they in every other.

Monarchs it may be said are apt to go to war with each other: and when with any two Monarchs this happens to case, the subjects of each should in that Monarch who is the enemy of their Monarch, that is of their natural enemy have a friend. But in practice this is not the case. The war one Monarch carries on with another Monarch is a war of rivalry but it is not a war of enmity: every Monarch is to every other Monarch an object of respect: and where there is respect on both sides, no rooted no decided enmity can be said to have place on either side. Between Monarch and Monarch war is upon the largest scale that which between professed pugilist and professed pugilist it is upon the smallest scale. By one another they are stiled brothers; and in that on occasion they are sincere. They have a common interest: and that interest is paramount to every other interest. Many a Monarch has given up to a brother Monarch, and freely too, domains he might have kept if he had pleased. No Monarch ever gave up freely to his own subjects an atom of power which in his eyes could be retained with safety. War is a game: a game of chess /of backgammon/. Between two players at the game of war there is no more enmity than between two players at backgammon On the part /breasts/ of the players at war there is no more feeling for the men of war /of flesh and blood/, than at /during/ the game at backgammon there is on the part of the men of wood there is for one another or themselves.

While to one another all Monarchs are objects of sympathy: to all Monarchs all subjects are objects of antipathy of a sort of compound sentiment, composed /made up/ of fear, and hatred and contempt: On the part of all Monarchs there exists something like that which women and children are apt to feel for a toad. In the breasts of all Monarchs there accordingly exists at all times a natural alliance, defensive and offensive against all subjects.

As between injurers and injured, the man on whose part antipathy toward the other can soonest cease /is most apt to cease/ is he who has been injured /by whom the injury has been sustained/: the one on whose part it ceases with greatest difficulty if it ever ceases at all is he by whom the injury has been inflicted.

Betwixt every Monarch and every other there exists a powerful cause of sympathy: in no instance ever could or ever can that cause have failed to be more or less productive of effect. On the same principle /In the instance of all of them/ on one and the same principle /set of principles/ is grounded that obedience by which their power is constituted, and in proportion to which it has place disposition the effect of habit: habit the effect of force, fear, corruption, delusion: and sinister interest, interest-begotten and authority-begotten prejudice By every other throne he sees shaking, if the shock be from without he feels the shock communicated to his own.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1822. July 1 st Constiut Code]
    Description: 1822. July 1 st

    Constiut Code

    Rationale Supreme Operative 2. Monarch 1. Moral inaptitude

    10.

    While to one another Monarchs are objects of sympathy, to all Monarchs all subjects are objects of antipathy: of a mixture of hatred and contempt. Among all Monarchs alliance defensive and offensive against all subjects.

    11.

    Implaceable this antipathy. By the injured, the injurer may be pardoned: much less easily so by the injurer the injured: the fear and anger of the injurer will represent the ill will of the injured greater than it is.

    12.

    True, Monarchs with each other: in a Monarch who is an enemy to them, the subject, it may be thought, should have a friend. But as between Monarch and Monarch it is rivalry, not enmity: as between pugilist and pugilist, many a Monarch has given up power freely to a Monarch: none to his non-subjects Monarch and Monarch are Backgammon players: neither are insensible to the others sufferings: both as insensible to subjects d o. as Backgammon men are. 13.

    In private as well as public life, the bottom is Monarch's place in the seale of moral worth. Cause 1. Self regarding prudence. The greater a man's need of the free good will of others, the stronger his inducement to obtain it by manifestation of good will towards them: the less the weaker. Of all men, Monarch has least need of such good will. Good offices for which others are dependent on free good will, he commands partly by punitive force, partly by remuneration. 14.

    So, the more extensively exposed to ill will and ill offices at te hands of others, the stronger his inducement to preserve himself from it and its affects: the less extensive the less strong. Against the effect of ill will on the part of others, King is particularly secure partly by his primitive power, partly by his remuneration by which, without will, he can obtain good office 15.

    Thus is his place, not as per vulgar statement at the top, but at the bottom of the seale of moral worth. Causes of the vulgar error, corruption and delusion. See further. 16.

    Thus consummate is Monarch's inaptitude in the branch opposed to Moral aptitude. By the contemplation of the utmost sufferings of his subjects through his misrule can any desire of seeing them less intense exclusion. Adequate cause of this apathy, want of appropriate conception. To sympathy of affection, sympathy of conception is indispensable.
  • Title: [[xxxvi. 130] 1822 June 29 Constitut]
    Description: [xxxvi. 130]

    1822 June 29

    Constitut. Code

    Supreme Operative

    I. Monarch

    1. Morals

    Interest sinister

    ?. Monarchs interest how far opposite to, how far coincident with the universal interest

    A community of interest (it may be said) has place between a Monarch and his subjects: and this community of interest will suffice for securing them against ill treatment at his hands: nay: for securing to them the best treatment in his power. True. There is a community of interest between a Post master and his Post-horses: but this community of interest does /suffices/ not suffice for saving them from an untimely death at the end of a life of torment. The interest which a Monarch has in common with his subjects is not sufficient to render him in general so well disposed towards his subjects as a Post master is to his Post-horses. By the horses nothing is usually done by which irritation and hatred towards them are produced in the breast of the Master. By the subjects much is constantly done by which irritation and hatred and continually renewed irritation is produced in the breast of the Monarch.

    Spite of whatsoever there is in common between the two interests In the breast of every Monarch the tendency of his disposition is at all times and in all places to produce the greatest infelicity of the greatest number. Such is every where the tendency necessarily produced by his situation: and such every where, except in so far as accidental circumstances have risen up in opposition to such tendency has been, and so long as a Monarchy exists upon the face of the earth will be - the effect.

    The more particularly the several shapes in which interest has place in the two situations are examined into - the several departments in the field of legislation to which it applies are examined into, the less numerous and extensive the seats of coincidence, the more numerous and extensive the seats of opposition as between the two interests will be seen to be.
  • Title: [[clxiv. 252] 1820 Aug. 9 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxiv. 252]

    1820 Aug. 9

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    Corruptive influence

    BB Self preference in private life checked by sympathy, in public not unless by Democracy.

    The predominance of self-regarding interest over all social interest being thus necessary to the very existence of the species while the existence of others is necessary to the existence of each, hence arise the two opposite phaenomena /states of things/

    Every man /human being/ is the natural friend /enemy/ of every other

    Every human being is the natural enemy /friend/ of every other

    Every human being has in every other a natural friend /enemy/

    Every human being has in every other a natural enemy /friend/

    In private life by the sympathies which are among the causes and effects of natural relationship /affinity/, and by those others which are formed even between stranger and stranger by mutual wants and desires the amity is strengthened the enmity weakened.

    In public life, there is but one form of government by which any permanent strength can be given to the amity any permanent and effectual /considerable/ softening to the enmity: but one form of government, and that is a pure representative democracy, that invention which is worth all others put together: the product of a happy mixture of prudence, benevolence and good fortune in these latter times.

    In a pure monarchy all other interests are of course sacrificed to the interest real or supposed /fancied/ of the ruling one. The governed have in their governor /subject many behold and feel in their governor/ in chief an irresistible and implacable enemy in their governor in chief an enemy irresistible and implacable: and it is at the disposal of their enemy that every thing that is dear to them is for ever placed