1
results found in
13 ms
Page 1
of 1
[036-130v]
1822 Jan y. 22
Codification Proposal
Inserendum
'.2. Rationale necessary or '.3. Reasons what
Taken by itself, not only every act by which punishment is inflicted, but Every act by which power is exercised by compulsory means power by any one man exercised over any other, is an evil. /For the act by which this evil is produced/ To constitute a perfect warrant for the act by which this evil is produced two points of probability must be sufficiently established: that by the evil thus produced preponderant good good to a preponderant amount will be produced; and that at a less expence in the shape /article/ of evil good in question could not by the means in question or any other means have been produced. In the framing of the rationale, both these points /objects/ will be constantly kept in view.
On the occasion of /In speaking of/ a law or body of law expressions of approbation and disapprobation - such as good and bad, beneficial and pernicious, will be /are/ seen continually presenting themselves. Till some standard is fixt, approbation or disapprobation on the part of him who thus speaks of them - the state of his mind in relation to the object /objects/ in question, not any quality in the objects themselves this and nothing more will be the thing really designated: this and nothing more, with whatsoever greater weight whose words the words are may wish to see them operate. When the rationale in question with this maxim for its ground has been established the import of these same expressions considered as indicative of qualities belonging to the states of things, acts or other events spoken of, will now for the first time now and for ever henceforward be fixt.
Similar Items
-
Title: [[lxxxiv. 103] 1822 Jany 16]Description: [lxxxiv. 103] 1822 Jany 16 Codification Offer ?.5 Admission Universal Necessarily included in the possession of power is impunity - impunity in respect /on the score/ of the exercise of it: impunity in respect of all sufferings imposed on the people by the acts done for procuring in the abovementioned shapes enjoyment and the instruments of it to the rulers: impunity in respect of laws enacted /established/ for the purpose of the sinister sacrifice: impunity in respect of acts done for the same purpose in violation of the then existing laws: exemption from /security against/ punishment and exemption from /security against/ reproach. On any person bearing part in the production of suffering thus produced by misrule reproach may be cast in either of two /any one of three/ ways: viz 1. By giving indication /affording information/ to the public of the evil-producing /pernicious/ act. 2. By giving the like information with relation to the persons concerned in the commission of it /production of the mischief/ 3. By bringing to view the mischiefs resulting from it 4 By exciting by means of general expressions of disapprobation the disapprobation and resentment of the people in relation to the persons concerned in it By these several means any /all/ such functionaries as in respect of the acts done by them in the exercise of their functions stand exposed to /are by the laws made subject to eventual/ punishment may be exposed not only to reproach but to punishment On this account it will of course be a /the/ perpetual object with /endeavour/ of both parties in this partnership to prevent /oppose an insuperable bar/ by every means in their power to preserve themselves all such information and all such reproach Such information may be divulgated and such reproach cast either by oral or by written discourse The time at which the means employed for the prevention of such divulgation /indication/ and such reproach is either antecedent to the utterance of it or subsequent to the exercise of the obnoxious act Applied antecedently these means of prevention are preventive compleatly and effectively preventive: not applied except subsequently, they are incompleatly and uncertainly preventive: to what /whatever/ is past they have no application, and as applied to the future they are comparatively inefficient, the effect of them being subject to all the uncertainties that attach upon discovery, prosecution conviction sentence and execution
-
Title: [1821. April 17. First Lines]Description: 1821. April 17. First Lines Penal Law Cases unmeet In relation to punishment, considered as so mauch evil, employed as a means for the excluding, as far as possible, without greater evil, evil considered as producible by misdeeds thus converted - converted by the connection thus established into offences, three main questions on every occasion present themselves - 1. In what cases shall punishment be aplied - 2. In what proportion - 3. In what shape - 1. In what cases shall it be applied? A question of the opposite aspect - by the question in what cases shall it not be applied - a shorter and clearer /more commodious howsoever indirect/ answer may be given to this question than by a direct one. 1. Where it would be groundless - 2. Where it would be inefficacious /needless/ - 3. Where it would be unprofitable /inefficacious/ - 4. Where it would be unprofitable /needless/ - These are the cases in which /In each one of these cases, supposing them realised/ punishment itis evident manifest would be unapt: of all these cases, it may be said, they are unmeet for punishment. Case the first - where punishment would be groundless: Where the application of punishment would be unapt. Necessarily involved /included/ in the notion of punishment is the notion of misdeed done, of offence given. Of the sort of operation by which,for the exclusion of greater evil, evil is purposely produced, the operation called punition or more commonly punishment, is but one mode. For, taken by itself, Government is in itself one great /vast/ evil: only except in so far as evil already produced by it, is done away or lessened, can any exercise of Government be performed - can the power of Government be in any way exercised, but evil is produced by it. But wherever, by evil thus produced, greater evil is excluded, the balance takes the nature, shape, and name of good, and Government is justified in the production of it. In this case unless productive of good in some other shape /in the account of good and evil, the evil produced and applied in the shape of punishment would unless it excluded some greater evil, or produced some preponderant good be all loss. Thus it is that where evil applied as punishment wd. be groundless, what will often happen, is - that evil produced, though designedly, is not causeless - is not unjustifiable
-
Title: [[clx. 253] 1822 July 9 Constitut]Description: [clx. 253] 1822 July 9 Constitut Code Rationale Securities Factitious honor ?.2 Expository matter ??.2 Its mode of operation A few points relative to this product /Relative to this product of government, /Here/ a few points there are which/ call for explanation 1. It operates as an order for respect, for respect to be for token of respect to be afforded and as it were paid by persons in general to him on whom the honor is said to be conferred. It operates therefore as a title to respect. In this particular It is in regard to respect that which an order for the payment of money a draught for example on a banker - is in regard to money: but with this difference that it is only on /at the hands of/ that one individual /person/ that the order for money calls for money, whereas it is at the hands of all persons in general that the title of honor - the order for respect - calls for respect. On the each occasion of each such act It is an exercise of dominion over the many, for indeed in some sort over all, for the benefit of the one - over the many, indeed in some sort /with little exception/ over all. The means not being coercive, it produces not that sense of oppression which in general dominion exercised by coercive means /employing as usual /it must do/ coercion for its instrument/ can not when exercised /directed/ towards so unjustifiable an end, fail to produce. It is by delusion that the effect is produced not by force or intimidation. But the effect of it being as will be seen purely mischievous, the circumstance of their being one evil in [...?] which is not produced by it, will not suffice for turning /to turn/ the whole mass of evil into good.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1