1821. April 7th.

First Lines.

Explanations.

Civil Law

Subsistence, abundance, security and equality: by these then will be presented to view the several subordinate or particular ends most immediately in contact with, and branching out from, the only legitimate and universal end of Government - the greatest happiness of the greatest number.

By subsistence, understand the means of subsistence: by abundance the elements of subsistence and all other external and /tangible/ transferable instruments of gratification, and thence objects of desire, in quantity exceeding by an indefinite amount the quantity necessary to subsistence.

Neither subsistence nor abundance neither in /by/ the import of the word subsistence, nor in the import of the word abundance is any relation to futurity necessarily involved. In the import of the word security, that relation is constantly and necessarily involved: the present being at all times but a point, the word security can never present itself without presenting to view one point at least which is neither the present nor the past.

Security may be considered with reference to the objects which ae secured, and with reference to the objects against which they are secured.

Taking human beings individually considered, these are the only real entities considered as being secured. But when a particular and practical application comes to be made of the word security, certain names of fictitious entities in common use must be employed to designate so many objects to and for which the security is afforded. By the words person, reputation, property, condition in life - by these four names of fictitious entities all the objects to which, in the case of an individual, the security afforded by Government can apply itself may be designated. Reputation, property, condition in life - these are obviously names of fictitious entities: person as here employed ministers to the same purpose. For, to the present purpose, person means an object divisible into body and mind. For, security is against injury, and the body being exposed to one set of injuries, the mind is exposed to another, and an altogether different set
Similar Items
  • Title: [7 Aug. 1814 Logic Ch. │ │ Methodization]
    Description: 7 Aug. 1814

    Logic

    Ch. │ │ Methodization

    '. │ │ Subjects of Denominant

    4

    Fictitious entities, viz. the objects for the designation of which throughout the whole course of the present work this appellative is meant to be employed, are such of which, in a very ample proportion, the mention and consequent fiction requires to be introduced for the purpose of discourse, for the common purposes of every discourse. Their names being employed in the same manner as names of substances are employed, hence the character in which they present themselves is that of so many names of substances. But these names of fictitious entities do not, as do the abovementioned names of fabulous entities, raise up in the mind any correspondent images.

    Follows a sort of commenced catalogue of these fictitious entities of these names of fictitious entities: from which the common nature in which as above they all participate will presently become perceptible. Like the names of real and those of fabulous entities, all these words, it will be seen are, in the language of Grammarians, noun substantives. All these fictitious entities are accordingly so many fictitious substances. The properties which for the purposes of discourse are attributed to them are so many properties of substances - so many properties of all substances.

    That the properties belonging to substances, to bodies in general, are attributed to them - that they are spoken of as if possessed of such properties, appears from the prepositions by which the import of their respective names is put in connexion with the import of the other words of which the sentence, [by which] the grammatical sentence is composed.

    272
  • Title: [1821 April 15: First Lines]
    Description: 1821 April 15:

    First Lines

    Means

    Distributive

    4 Equality

    \PS\.4. Equality

    Fourth on the list of the benefits which the Civil Branch of the Law is occupied in

    distributing - /is/ equality.

    Of the four several possessions, for which according to their several natures,

    security for individuals is required individually considered, property is the only

    one, with relation to which, equality requires, or with propriety admits of, any

    considerable diversification. With the exception of such cases Except in so far as

    security cannot be given /afforded/ to one man, but by defalcation made from the

    security given /afforded/ to another -, where is the man to whom appropriate security

    ought not to be afforded for his person for his reputation or for his condition in

    life? Where is the man to whom for any one of those three possessions, greater or

    better security ought to be afforded than to any other?

    Remains property as the only one of the four possessions, remains property as the

    only one in relation to which, the application of the benefit of equality requires

    any considerable discrimination or reserve.

    Subsistence, security, - to the value of both these benefits, the value of that

    which is presented by the word equality, is plainly subordinate. In regard to

    subsistence the case is - that considered as apart from, and unaccompanied by,

    abundance, equality is essentially involved and included in the very conception of

    it: for as consistently with the supposition no man can in this case have more of the

    means of subsistence than another, so consistently with his existence no man can have

    less.
  • Title: [1819 May 11 Jug. Util […?] & Sub Rev]
    Description: 1819 May 11

    Jug. Util […?] & Sub Rev in gross

    II Verity in gross

    § 7 Mind fictitious entity

    A moments reflection would suffice to assure us that this is not – can not be – the case: for if so, we should have /possess/ and not have but exercise an unlimited power of creation: by every word newly made or newly applied a new being would be created.

    Hence in regard to those words that are employed as names – nouns substantive they are called in grammar – hence the necessity of the distinction between such as are names of real entities and such as are names of fictitious entities. Names of real entities are names of those objects of which through the medium of the senses the existence is made known to us by experience or observation: names of fictitious entities are names of all objects of which the existence is not made known to us through experience or observation: For the most part though the existence of these is in this way asserted, it is not in truth so much as supposed. We make these assertions because though they are neither true nor so much as supposed to be true, discourse could not be carried on without them: and though they are so clearly untrue, and the objects which are the subjects of them are therefore in this sense not real but fictitious objects, the offspring of fiction, yet in this instance fiction is without blame or regret: why without blame or regret? because deception is neither the object endeavoured to be produced nor the effect actually produced.