1822 July 7

Constitut. Code Rationale

Established Religion none

Meantime by those by whom /whose power/ the religion has been thus established or continued to be thus supported a sort of certificate /an /a virtual/ assurance/ has been given and continues to be given that in their eyes the system thus supported is false. The side on which the witness with the straw in his shoe has been hired is the right side: but subornation of perjury is not the less the act by which the hiring has been performed: suborners of perjury the actors - and of such subornation the natural tendency and natural effect is to cause those to whom the side though by the supposition the right are to be in the eyes of those to whom the fact of the hiring is known, the wrong one. In vain would the hirers exclaim - Our side is the right one - we know it to be so: and the fear lest the Judge should be deceived into the contrary opinion is the cause why we take this method to keep him undeceived. The answer in every mouth would be were this allowed, the wrong side if it laid money enough on its side would in every case be the gainer.

Of no direct testimony /assurance/ given by the hiring /[...?]/ individual could the probable force given of his belief be rendered so great as the disprobative force of the circumstantial evidence of unbelief afforded by this hiring: by no protestations oral or written public or private: by no tears, by no turning up of the whites of eyes to the ceiling, as if to heaven.

In no case where it is men's real wish to inculcate the truth in no case do they take this method /course/ for the inculcating it. In no case in which it is a mans interest that truth /the truth on whatever side it be/ should be embraced does he take this method for the discovery of it, for causing discovery to be made of it, and the belief of it when discovered, entertained. In no case if it be a mans desire that a true and correct map of a country should be made and purchased in no case does he without having ever seen the country draw a map of his own and say copy and publish this map you shall have so much money - make and publish a map of the country from a survey of it made by yourself, you shall have nothing.
Similar Items
  • Title: [22[?] July 1810 7 Fallacies Ch |]
    Description: 22[?] July 1810 7

    Fallacies Ch | | Causes & Obstacle

    5

    | | Universities 1. Virtue

    | | 1. Virtue Universities

    If perjury be any thing, if it any the slightest degree there be any thing wrong in it, the more completely innoxious and insignificant those acts are, by the commission of which the oath is violated and perjury committed, the more inexcusable is the act of those by whom it is caused this uselessly and tr[...?]ly produced. If the transgression had any thing mischievous in it, the prevention of it would in proportion to the mischief prevented by productive of beneficial consequence, and the mischief of the perjury and the subornation of the perjury have so much good to set against it. But if in the transgression there be nothing mischievous in the prevention of it there is nothing beneficial, and the mischief /evil/ of the perjury and the subornation is so much pure evil, unalloyed and unemp[...?]cated and unalloyed.
  • Title: [Jan 1808 Evid. Prosp. View]
    Description: Jan 1808

    Evid. Prosp. View

    1. If there were no other means of saving avoiding the use of exempting delinquents from the

    punishment of death than the giving encouragement to perjury

    on the part of Jurymen the encouragement mischief thus done thus given

    whether useful upon the whole or not, would not be absolutely

    devoid of use. But [+] a much more surely efficacious simple

    [+] in on the particular occasions instances in question as in on all others

    as well as more simple efficacious made of avoiding the

    use of this pernicious mode of punishment is in man's

    power, viz. the abolishing it ceasing to employ it.

    2. If there were no other on the part of the legislator means of avoiding the use of the

    punishment of death than the giving encouragement con y at the disobedience to

    the Judge and immediately practiced by in the subornation of perjury in the part of

    Jurymen, the mischief thus done, whither productive of

    real advantage or no upon the whole, would not be absolutely

    devoid of use. But on the particular occasions

    in question as in on all other others occasions a much more

    surely efficacious as well as more simple mode of avoiding the

    use of this pernicious mode of punishment is in mans

    power, viz. the ceasing to employ it.

    3. Go in so with the other mischiefs? or abridge?
  • Title: [[clxiv. 106] 1820 June 24 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxiv. 106]

    1820 June 24

    Emancipation Spanish

    ? Corruptive influence

    5. Mode of operation

    The /These/ terms suborner and subornation have not with equal frequency been applied to misdeed in any other shape, to misdeeds bearing any other denomination with so much frequency as to misdeed in the shape of perjury: misdeeds in the shape of perjuries. But whether it for the purpose of prevention and thence of exposure, there is a no less uncontrovertible demand for it in the case of misdeed in any other shape than in the case of misdeed in this shape. Indeed if there be misdeeds the mischief /evil/ of which is greater than the mischief /evil/ from perjury, in the instance /several cases/ of all these several misdeeds the demand for it is greater than in the case of perjury: and the greater the evil the mischief, the more imperative the demand.

    As to the sort of misdeed here in question, whatsoever may be its particular nature and effect in particular situations, it comes under /it may be expressed by/ the general denomination of a breach of trust.

    The sort of trust here /on this occasion/ considered as liable to be broken is a public trust: a trust in the case of which the trustee is, as above, a person possessing some /a/ share more or less considerable in the mass of power of the aggregate of which the power of government is composed; and the persons for whom he is in trust, the whole body of the people, composed of all the members of the community in question, ruling few and subject many together, are the persons for whom he is in trust.