1
results found in
35 ms
Page 1
of 1
29 April 1803/ 13 Dec. 1808
Evidence
Marg. Con B.I Ch.I
F Work that ---- with
Ch.2 Species and book on circumstantial
1. Facts considered in these ---- -- are expressed by words.
2. Ex gr. positive or other nature -- ----- - existence and non-existence
F 1. Facts 2. legally in operation or - material X not Y.
3. Physical or psychological
4. Individual x general
5. Susceptible of permanancy x unsusceptible of to = ------
6. Entities 1. Real x 2. Fictions - words not being names of real entities.
7. Fictions 1. of the first order
2. Motions. physical
2d of the 2d order - ------- 2. Relations including -----.
8. Facts 1. -----
2. Events -----
9. ----- 1. physical -----
2. Moral i.e. physical compounded with psychological
10. Acts 1. Transient 2. ----. See ---- chemical
11. Facts 1. principal 2. evidentiary
12. - principal 1. in penali. Inculpative &c 2. in non-penali - ----- &c
13. 1. simple 2. complex or aggregate which include the ---- -------
14. Fact x matter of fact = a simple fact or an aggregate of facts too multifarious to be demonstrated a fact. Matter of fact = matter of ----, of punishment, of reward.
15. Facts 1. individual x general
16. To individual belongs individuation - to general belongs classification.
FACTS 1
Evidence is relative and consists of facts - evidence of facts: viz: facts exhibited or brought into existence for the sake of proving the existence or non-existence of other facts. Legal evidence of facts considered in a legal point of view = facts legally ---- = material = operative p.1
2(a)
Fact and matter of fact p.1
3.
- for the purpose of grounding a decision to be made by a judge p.1
4.
Facts considered in a legal point of view are principal or evidentiary - This is an introd. ---- to proced.
Principal, what p.2
5.
Evidentiary, what p.2
6.
Principal legal facts admit of a particular description. Any fact may be an evidentiary legal fact. p.2
6(a)
To exhibit the connection between facts principal & evidentiary in all cases an almost endless task.
Reference to book on circumstantial evidence
Principal facts distinguished (as before).
Provable by
Plff Defd
In respect of punishment
1. Inculpative 1. Exculpative
or Criminative or justificative
2. aggravative 2. Exemptive
3. Extenuative
I In respect of the burthen of satisfaction.
1. partitive[?] 1. Exonerative
or -------
II. In respect of rights
1. Collative 1. Ablative
or ---titive or divestitive
FACTS
8. Direct evidence applies to the principal fact: circumstantial to an evidentiary fact p.4
9 Facts ordinary and scientific. p.4
10 Facts improperly distinguished, according to the propositions in which they are
1. positive /affirmative/ or negative p.4
11 - true and false p.4
11(a) Distinction in the Roman law between the fact of the offence (corpus delicti) & and the fact consisting of the personality of the offender p.4.
1 Requiring proof of the corpus delicti is tantamount to requiring real evidenvce in addition to personal.
2 Facts general & particular
3 ---tions of opinion included under the notion of facts. The ---- was the cause of the death
4 Any thing which in the subject of ----- may be termed a fact.
5 Facts are ------ by words - i.e. by terms. Individuation of
6 Facts Facts --- transient (most facts).
- 2.Continual ex gr. identity - local circumstances 3. ------- ---- ----- ---- = concealment
7. 1. Provable by direct evidence - ex gr. materially
2. not except by circumstantial evidence - positively
8 1. ----
2. content[?]
1. -----
2. General
*7 10 Principal fact 1. the aggregate 2. the component or ------ facts of which the aggregate is composed --- ------ ----- ----- is always -------.
F Before the distinction between principal and evidentiary, state that between permanent and ------ permanent appear most susceptible of permanence; ------, unsusceptibel of do.
I. Permanent
1. Relative ---- as between body & body
2. Continued forms, colours &c
3. Continued existence of any object
II Impermanent
1. ---- --- ----
2. Action
3. Past existence of any object
Facts considered without reference to law = not legally operative
2 - with reference to do = legally operative:
12 Fact x law
F Analyse ----- of ---- to shew the facts in it.
Facts psychological are
1. Consciousness with reference to this or that other fact -----
2. Intentionality with regard to acts and effects -----
3. Motives - obedience to this or that motive or mass of motives or preponderant mass or lot of motives.
Facts psychological
1. Individual (as above)
2. General (in point of time) as habits from --- ---- not ----- (---) dispositions (future provable facts) including affections, -----, virtues, vices &c.
13 Dec. 1808 distinctions in regard to facts.
1. 1 ----- x state of things. Events. 1. Acts: 2. Events at large
2. Facts positive or negative: positive existence of events &c. negative non-existence
1. Facts are positive or negative: positive existence; negative non-existence, of some entity.
2. ------ natural 2. ----: ---- correspond to to denominations[?]
3. ------- are 1. physical 2. psychological
4. Physical are 1. things or any -------
5. ------ ----- are 1. of the 1st order 1. states /-----/ of things 2. Events = -------
6. Events are 1. Acts (corporal) 2. ---- at large
7. 2. of the 2d order
1. ------
2. Relations
3. Qualities
Similar Items
-
Title: [Aug 1804 Evidence Circumstantial]Description: Aug 1804 Evidence Circumstantial Ch.2. Circumstantial [...?] ยง.1. [...?] [...?] [...?] In the case of circumstantial evidence there are always two facts to be considered: 1. the principal fact /the factum probandum or[?] problematical/, the fact the existence of which is supposed or proposed to be proved or - to be evidenced: which is the subject of proof; 2 the evidentiary fact - the fact /the factum probans/ from which the existence of the principal fact is or may be inferred. The factum probandum may in any case be either of /is susceptible of two main distinctions: it may be or[?] it must be either of/ a physical nature, or of a psychological nature. In all cases of a penal nature, (high enough in rank to be reputed criminal,) certain facts of a psychological nature are necessary to constitute the crime[?]: these are 1. criminative intentionality and 2. criminative consciousness: and in many cases supposing criminative intentionality and consciousness ascertained the mischievousness of the act will be liable to be modified by the nature of the motive or motives which give birth to it. In all these cases the principal fact will therefore /accordingly/ be of a complex nature. Its ingredients will be /The existence, or in some cases the non-existence/ of some physical act or acts, together with the addition of /in conjunction with/ the psychological facts just mentioned.
-
Title: [23 Aug 1804 Evidence Circumstantial]Description: 23 Aug 1804 Evidence Circumstantial. Ch Application 5. Nor therefore can it be said of any species or article of circumstantial evidence that being but one it is therefore inclusive. 6. Nor of any number of species or articles of circumstantial evidence, that being in such a number, the body of evidence they constitute is conclusive 7. No article of or mass of evidence can justly be deemed conclusive, if upon the supposition of any other event the possibility of which is out of dispute, the /inference/ conclusion from the existence of the evidentiary fact to the existence of the principal fact be seen to fall[?]. 8. The /[...?]/ great use made of circumstantial evidence, is to infer the existence of a psychological fact from that of a physical fact: i.e. gr.[?] /viz./ to infer intentionality or consciousness from external behaviour. 9. A single instance of behaviour - a single act (positive or negative) done by a man in a given set of circumstances - on a given occasion - in a given state of things - may, in the individual case in question afford a mass /lot/ of evidence satisfactory, conclusive, in a degree sufficient for /to[?]/ practice - to warrant a judicial decision to this or that effect - in that individual instance.
-
Title: [30 Oct 1803 Evidence Circumstantial]Description: 30 Oct 1803 Evidence Circumstantial in general On the occasion /In relation to subject/ of these several modifications of circumstantial evidence, two points /three questions/ require all along to be kept in view[?] . 1. what the fact is /is the nature of/ which is regarded in the character of an evidentiary 2. what each species of evidence is in itself: what the sort of fact /fact/ is, in relation to which it is in the nature for[?] it /the evidentiary fact/ to operate as evidence: and what the circumstances are, if any, by the introduction of which the operating of it in that character may be rendered inconclusive. Note The division into physical evidence /if at all/ (understand circumstantial evidence) and psychological is an exhaustive one: in one branch or the other may be included every possible modification of circumstantial evidence. Portions /Divisions/ thus extensive[?] are two extensive, both of them, to apply exclusively to any species of legally-important fact: The point of view /character/ in which they are here mentioned is accordingly that of so many reservoirs or fountain heads[?] up to from which all modifications applying to any particular [...?] /species/of legally important facts may be traced. Under these three /two/ articles /heads/ there will accordingly be no mention made /room for any/ of the species of fact: but after these the designation of the species of fact evidenced will be a constant [...?] to /accompaniment of/ the each modification of circumstantial evidence. The same observations may be extended /applied/ to the two next heads with little difference. Under /To one or other of the two first heads may be ranked /referred/ all circumstantial /real/ evidence in the case where it is brought forward in affirmance of a fact fact undertaken /endeavoured/ to be proved: under one or other of the two next all circumstantial evidence in the case when it is brought to view in disaffirmance of a fact affirmed and evidenced, i.e.[?]: endeavoured to be proved on the other side. Flor it is only by reference to other facts that the improbability or impossibility by which is meant nothing more than improbability in the highest conceivable degree can be proved: the expression by which it is spoken of as if it were an absolute property, residing completely and exclusively in the improbable fact itself, may be received for the convention of discourse, but would lead to confusion and error, if taken for a correct representation of the nature of the case.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1