date

14 Nov 1804 Evidence Circumstantial
14 Nov 1804

Evidence

Circumstantial

Ch Supernatural

§ 4

§ 4. Parallel mode - decision on points foreign to the merits

One ground of decision there is which though perfectly natural - as natural in one sense as it is technical in another - is in another point of view exactly upon a level with the supernatural. I mean /This is/ the decision of a cause upon points foreign to the merits.

In an indictment for murder a clerk makes an omission: he drops the Devil or the value of the knife. The murder is put out of doubt in all its circumstances. Is the murderer guilty or no? The answer depends upon the materiality of the Devil and /or/ the knife. The Devil is he material? The omission of him is an exculpative fact disproving and that conclusively the existence of as many criminative facts ass have been proved. The evidence in this case - I mean the circumstantial evidence - is it of the Duel kind or the Ordeal kind? Answer. It depends upon circumstances. Was the Clerk [...?] for the omission? it is of the Ordeal kind Did he make it inadvertently and without a fee? It is of the Duel kind. It is upon a par with the duel: with the duel fairly fought. (In either case a connection is assumed between two facts between which there is none.)

In the detail[?] the cases in which the want[?] of a cause is made to turn upon points foreign to the merits belong not to this place. They will find their place in the rationale of procedure.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[...?] 1803 Evidence Circums]
    Description: [...?] 1803

    Evidence

    Circums. [...?] [...?]

    Ch. Divine.

    Circumstantial evidence in [...?] temporis, precedential or subsequential.

    Circumstantial evidence grounded on the supposition of a Theocracy or particular providence.

    In times now [...?], different contrivances were imagined and what is more employed for calling in /obtaining the services of/ God Almighty in the character of a witness. The Evidence thus sought for, belongs to the head of scientific evidence: and admitting it were to be had, can not be denied /must evidently be admitted/ to be the best evidence.

    Supposing it obtained, the shape in which it was expected to be obtained belongs to the head of circumstantial evidence. It was not direct. God Almighty /The witness/ was not expected to appear in court: his testimony was to be made out in the way of inference, from /it consisted[?] of/ the real evidence afforded by his actions, by his deportment: by the part he took in relation to the business: it was not expected to contain any specifications in respect of time or place: it was analogous in this respect to generally confessional evidence: it was a sort of generally attestative[?] evidence - attestative in general terms.

    For putting the question to God Almighty /this species of witness/ various modes of interrogation have been in use in various nations as also in the same nation, on different occasions. The most celebrated are 1. Wager of Battel 2. Ordeal &c Corsned &c. 3 Lot.

    Shew the train of ratiocination in the case of Wager of Battel, and the other cases. Then go on to say.

    Of these several modes of interrogation by far the most unexceptionable was that of lot: supposing it to be conducted without fraud. NO blood shed, no murder as in case of wager of battel. No poisoning /murder by poisons or other instruments/ under the veil of law and religion, as in case of the corsned or other ordeal, where it was predetermined that the evidence of the almighty /omniscient/ witness should be on the criminative side: /put into the criminative scale of this ballance:/ no imposture and corrupt breach of judicial official trust as in the case where it was predetermined that the evidence /testimony/ of the same unexceptionably veracious and decisive witness /evidence/ should be on the exculpative side.

    The same mode of decision would even now be an improvement and that a very considerable one, as /if/ substituted to decisions grounded on argumentation, in all questions of competency - of exclusion on the ground of security against deception: for in every other instance the testimony would upon this plan be admitted in one /in every other/ instance out of two, and the suitor would have an even chance for justice, the check to /upon/ delinquency would be much stronger - the security in respect of /life/ person, property, expectation and condition in life would be much stronger than at present.

    The witness, being a percipient witness an eye witness, would, had he been so minded, have given his evidence in individualizing terms but the terms actually employed by him were not of that sort they were general terms, such as are employed in the sort of had[?] above characterized by the appellation of generally [...?] evidence.

    Note

    The authority exercised by man over his maker is /has been/ unbounded. Jealousy, capricious haughty malevolent without provocation, He creates him after his own image: by promissory oaths o all kinds he has made him act in the character of an [...?] Executioner adopt and execute upon delinquents all human laws. By supernatural modes of trial, or rather of attestation, he makes /forces/ him to give decisive evidence in all cases.
  • Title: [16 Dec 1802 2 May 1803 Evidence]
    Description: 16 Dec 1802 2 May 1803

    Evidence

    Circumstantial

    Ch. 6

    Thus in the case of homicide the act by which the fatal blow itself was given maybe considered as the principal fact and the narration of the eye witness by whom this fact including all the contemporary phenomena by which it was accompanied and characterized in what is meant by direct evidence: the appearance of blood at another time upon the cloaths of the supposed murderer the appearance of a pistol or knife supposed to have belonged to the supposed murderer and found lying near the dead body, the marks of agitation betrayed by the aspect the voice and the discourse of the supposed murderer some time after, all these maybe considered as so many evidentiary facts and the evidence of which they are the subject matter the evidence by which they are laid before the judge are so many species of circumstantial evidence.

    [Note]

    In this case it is the physical act that is considered as the subject of the direct evidence: Even as to circumstances inculpation; aggretion; exculpative[?] [...?], and extenuative. Shown also as non-[...?]
  • Title: [14 Nov 1804 Evidence Circumstantial]
    Description: 14 Nov 1804

    Evidence

    Circumstantial

    Ch. Supernatural

    §.3 Ordeal

    § 3. Trial by Ordeal - i.e. by fraud.

    Come us now to /next comes/ the ordeal class. Walking blindfold or with the appearance of being blindfold in a labyrinth of red hot ploughshares: drawing a ring out of the bottom of a cauldron of water which boils with or without heat: drinking red water with or without poison in it. In these ways and a thousand others you prove adultery or chastity, bloody hands or clean ones, witchcraft or non-witchcraft - anything you please.

    How many superior /neater/ modes of [...?] the dirty[?] /doing justice/ would have been invoked and [...?] by [...?] or [...?]!

    Duels and Ordeals together out of the ... close printed paper of the Esprit des Lois. Montesquieu employs dull ones upon these murders and [...?]. He forgets not to find names: [...?] in on the ground of law the boundaries between right and wrong should fall[?] in any point of of being as indistinct as possible.

    1) and of the few [...?] that have any thing to do with law

    2) He describes, reflects [...?].