date

5 Sept 1804 Evidence Circumstantial
5 Sept 1804

Evidence

Circumstantial

Ch General View

§.2

By the very import of the term, precedential evidence has a natural, and prima facie an irrecusable, claim to precedence. But although with reference to the time of the fact said /supposed/ to be evidenced, a fact of the class /here referred/ of precedential facts is in every instance precedent, yet the time at which it comes to be given in evidence - presented to the consideration of the Judge, is always posterior to that same point of time. On that (same) occasion, whatever facts of the precedential class come to be brought to view, are indiscriminably mixed with evidentiary facts of the other two classes /descriptions/ concomitant and subsequential: Even acts of the same denomination may, in many if not most instances come to be performed on the same occasion in the same view, at either or both these periods. Then /If/ of a subsequential nature, notice could not therefore but have been taken under the head of precedential facts, had that head occupied the foremost place. To the head of precedential it seemed better therefore to confine the mention of such circumstances (viz: preparations[?], declarations of intention, and threats) as by their nature stand excluded from the capacity of coming into existence at any other period. But of these especially the two first it may be observed that they are alike applicable to principal acts of any description as to such as being marked with the characters of delinquency belong exclusively to the head of penal law. It would therefore have disturbed the regularity of our[?] inquiry /progress of the inquiry/ to have begun with a class thus extensive, proceeded immediately to one so much narrower, and after this momentary contraction to have reverted again to a more expanded scale.
Similar Items
  • Title: [21 Sept. 1804 Evidence Circumstantial]
    Description: 21 Sept. 1804

    Evidence

    Circumstantial

    Ch Failure Causes

    § Delinquency - Fear

     Add ambiguity on [...?] fear and anger? depending on idiosyncrasy.

    A sort of compound evidentiary fact composed of the symptoms in question and the occasion which brought them under observation will therefore in general constitute the slightest article of evidence that on the occasion in question can come to be adduced: and the probative force of this compound fact is the force which any infirmative facts of which the case may be found susceptible, will have to combat. Let us proceed in our inquiry of these informative facts.
  • Title: [Aug 1804 Evidence Circumstantial]
    Description: Aug 1804

    Evidence

    Circumstantial

    Ch.2. Circumstantial [...?]

    §.1. [...?] [...?] [...?]

    In the case of circumstantial evidence there are always two facts to be considered: 1. the principal fact /the factum probandum or[?] problematical/, the fact the existence of which is supposed or proposed to be proved or - to be evidenced: which is the subject of proof; 2 the evidentiary fact - the fact /the factum probans/ from which the existence of the principal fact is or may be inferred.

    The factum probandum may in any case be either of /is susceptible of two main distinctions: it may be or[?] it must be either of/ a physical nature, or of a psychological nature.

    In all cases of a penal nature, (high enough in rank to be reputed criminal,) certain facts of a psychological nature are necessary to constitute the crime[?]: these are 1. criminative intentionality and 2. criminative consciousness: and in many cases supposing criminative intentionality and consciousness ascertained the mischievousness of the act will be liable to be modified by the nature of the motive or motives which give birth to it.

    In all these cases the principal fact will therefore /accordingly/ be of a complex nature. Its ingredients will be /The existence, or in some cases the non-existence/ of some physical act or acts, together with the addition of /in conjunction with/ the psychological facts just mentioned.
  • Title: [9[?] Sept 1804 Evidence Circumstantial]
    Description: 9[?] Sept 1804

    Evidence

    Circumstantial

    Ch. Exemplification

    General [...?]

    To give a detailed view of circumstantial evidence applicable to all cases - that is of evidentiary facts applicable to all sorts of principal fact, the existence of which is liable to come in question in judicature - would be a task of not altogether impracticable, at least not practicable within the limits in point of bulk room[?] to which a work of so extensive a range as the present work is necessarily confined. Under the head of Appropriate Evidence, there will be occasion to speak of the necessity of discarding the consideration of evidence /evidentiary facts/ in so far as the principal facts to which they respectively apply do not come in question but on the occasion of this or that particular species[?] of cause[?]: and of the evidence thereby designated a large portion /proportion/ will always be found to belong to the head of circumstantial evidence.