21 Aug 1804

Evidence

Introd. Jurisprudential

Ch. 2. Sources

''.5. dictates of Utility

'' Proportionable use made of the principle of utility in different branches of jurisprudential law.

The penal branch is that in the composition of which the principle of utility will /must/ have had the greatest share: especially that which concerns offences against individuals. Offences striking against the person, property, (known and acknowledged property in whatsoever shape and whence so ever derived) reputation and condition in life of individuals would in this way receive their punishment and virtual prohibition, as the several instances examples [...?] of the several species of delinquency happened to present themselves.

In the course of this process a multitude of pretences every one more idle than another for refusing to annex punishment to delinquency - for refusing /pro tanto/ in the several cases the protection of the law for person, property, reputation or condition in life against the injuries respectively in question, were brought forward and allowed. In the case of offences against property for example - adhesion of the subject matter to the freehold - wildness /original wildness of disposition/, or original want of value on the part of the subject matter (it being an animal) and the like.

If by all these exceptions of this cast - and there is no dearth /scarcity/ of them the use of the law was diminished, the bulk of it at any rate was encreased: and in this way, like many a worthless human creature, in default of other merits, it became respectable by its opulence.
Similar Items
  • Title: [2 August 1805 Evidence Introd]
    Description: 2 August 1805

    Evidence

    Introd. Jurisprud.

    Ch. II Vices

    ''. 6. Fixation incompetancy

    The jurisprudential learning of larceny is a topic which in more occasions /instances/ than one there will be occasion /has been need/ to bring to view. Attachment imaginary or real, natural or fictitious, if the thing taken to the main body of the worth, tameness or wildness in the case of this or that species of animal, value in way of exchange more or less fixed and marketable, all these may serve as examples of fixation made by jurisprudential law under the auspices of Corruption or folly /caprice/ in the way of exception, condition or limitation taking the thief into the privation of the law, and putting the proprietor - or as lawyers used to say the true men as he is called out of it.

    In a word let him who will undertake to say which disposition is in jurisprudential law most conspicuous - the disposition to /.../ or the disposition to make /annex/ rash and groundless exceptions conditions and limitations, or the disposition to establish equally rash general rules within any of those exceptions, conditions and limitations which are /would be/ necessary to reduce them within the limits of utility and reason.
  • Title: [29 Dec r 1806 Scotch Reform]
    Description: 29 Dec r 1806

    Scotch Reform

    To L d Grenville

    Omissa

    Pleadings

    On this occasion, an implement of no mean use to the legislator would /might/ be a comparative Table of the names /in [...?]/ of civil actions or demands in use in the several systems of procedure with which we as Britons have most occasion to be acquainted. The number of columns in it would be four: one containing a set of natural denominations, as expressive as they could be made /as, whether[?] by selection or invention/, to serve as a common [...?] of explanation and standard of reference: another /the record/ containing the technical denominations in use in English

    law /jurisprudence/, the third those in the [...?], the fourth those in the Scotch.

    In so far as these demands can be made to wear a penal form[?], being demands for satisfaction on the score of some [...?] and thence of some transgression, already committed, list of natural denominations, or at least one attempt to make one is to be formed in one or both /other/ of two works already extant. + Introd [...?].

    So far as they are incapable of wearing a penal form[?] as above described, they would remain yet to be composed. But the object of demand being in every case some sort of service, the list of civil demands would correspond with the list of services. Nor would he principle of division and arrangement be [...?] to [...?]: for as in he Tables /[...?]/ above attended to, Offences operating to the prejudice of individuals are distinguished according to the different respects in which man is susceptible of injury - offences striking against the person, against reputation, against property, against condition [...?] life, against person and reputation against person and property together, so in a way equally natural may services[?] acts operating to man's advantage.
  • Title: [7 July 1805 Evidence 6. Dictates]
    Description: 7 July 1805

    Evidence

    6. Dictates of Utility

    That in the formula of those decisions which are employed as [...?] of jurisprudential law no regard at all should have been paid to the dictates of utility - that utility should have had no place among the sources from whence the system is derived, is a proposition which never could have been /impossible to have been/ resolved, in any existing system how /however/ barbarous and absured soever. Utility it was and nothing else that contributed the origin of all judicature, except in so far as judicature may have been employed by some single ruler for one other purpose than the mere support of his own power, utility it must have been and nothing else that constituted the origin of all judicature. At no time has judicature been any thing less than necessary to the very being of society: every where the existence and preservation of those regions on which security for person, property, reputation and condition in life depends have been the work of judicature: and it is by the source of utility, of that extreme utility which reserves the name necessity, that men's acquiesence in the application of the [...?] of judicature to the several needs were /was/ every where produced.

    But all over the world judicatures must have been carried on, carried on for a countless multitude of ages, before any of their operations were in use by which the memory of past decisions is preserved. Jurisprudential law grounded on considerations of utility must therefore have been formed, long before the foundation of that sort of jurisprudential law which is grounded in precedents.