9 Aug 1804

Procedure

CB

E 6a +6b

Thus wretched is the tool, thus impotent to every useful purpose thus potent to every mischievous one - which lawyers in all countries /places/ and in all ages /times/, have been so well content to work with. Content? and why? because it is the tool /instrument/ of their own making - the tool of which they have the monopoly, the tool by which alone without opposition or disturbance they are enabled to work to their own ends.

Boundless accordingly and shameless are the dogmas with which on all possible occasions in and out of season, they are never tired with [...?] it /of heaping on it/: as if haunted on every occasion by the consciousness of its worthlessness - apprehensive of the voice of just complaint - and seeing no reason but that /means of defence against it but in the hope/ of drowning it in the din /roar/ of exaggerated /animated/ /thunderous/ applause.

For this purpose no misrepresentation is ever spared by a class of men in whose language the art /practice/ of misrepresentation stiles itself a duty, and to whom the practice of it is a daily exercise.
Similar Items
  • Title: [8 aug 1804 Procedure ''.6.5]
    Description: 8 aug 1804

    Procedure

    ''.6.5. Exception in Justification[?]

    [Adequate in this way to every purpose of mischief by the punishment of innocent acts it has not been less scanty in respect of the arrangements necessary to the security and prosperity to the community in which it acts.] Potent to do evil, it is not the less impotent to do good. Could the pretensions advanced by speeches such as the above be consistently pursued, legislative power would be swallowed up by judicial - judicial power would include legislative, and the office of legislator might become a sine cure But /When the mode /whoever observes with sufficient attention the course/ of action necessary pursued by judicial power when it steps aside from its own proper track to engage in the track of legislation /out of its one track into that of legislation/ will see but too clearly that this excess in theory will ever be accompanied by sufficiency in practice.
  • Title: [30 Sept. 1814 Logic 5]
    Description: 30 Sept. 1814

    Logic

    5

    Ch.2. Ontology

    Entities classed

    39

    5

    In so far as a work is considered as having been produced, some person any person /agent/ who in respect of his active talent is regarded as having borne the principal part in the production of the work, is wont to be spoken of under the appellation of the author or an author.

    In this same case, any body which is considered /regarded/ as having, in consequence of the motion impressed /communicated/ upon it, been rendered contributory to the production of the work, is wont to be spoken of in the character and by the name of an instrument: any body, viz. if considered /inasmuch/ as inanimate, an instrument in the physical sense; if animated, and /or/ considered as animated, and in particular if regarded as rational an instrument in the psychical sense:

    - if regarded as simple, a tool or implement - if regarded as complex, an engine, a machine - a system of machinery.

    61
  • Title: [16 Feb 1814 Jug. Util. I. Sub]
    Description: 16 Feb 1814

    Jug. Util.

    I. Sub. Rev

    Ch.3. Sanction inefficient.

    + Quere (21 Aug 1815) ought not the inefficiency to good purposes be postponed to the efficiency to bad ones?

    Potent as you say it is to do evil, how can it be thus impotent (it may be asked) to do good? +

    The pains of hell if they suffice not to fill the whole expanse of life with perpetual bitterness viz. in the shape of pain of apprehension, still less will they suffice in any tolerable /considerable/ degree to the purpose of salutary restraint in the shape of deterrative punishment. To this latter purpose they can not operate with effect at any other time /conjunction/ than when the temptation to transgress is present and /acting/ operating. But this is exactly the time at which they experience a /find themselves opposed by/ counterforce which in the general heat /tenor/ of life is not present.

    Future punishment will naturally be less efficient to the purpose of occasional and salutary restraint than to that of habitual and useless terror and misery.