date

5th[?] June 1805 Evidence Introd
5th[?] June 1805

Evidence

Introd

' General

In all these maxims and devise and maxims of lawyer-craft, there is nothing but what has been long ago observed in priest-craft: to whatever purpose applied the arts of imposture will ever be the same.

Note?

I speak of priest-craft in general, independently /without/ of any particular applications: the existence of priest-craft is recognised by some men even in priests of their own religion, and by every man in the priests of every religion that is not his own.

Imposture in lawyers has been no less busy nor less successful than in priests. Yet priest-craft has for ages been the object of invective: while lawyer-craft has been till now without a name?

When in any country, in any walk of science or pretended science, things are in such a state, that the function of public instruction is become an object of monopoly to single hand, the policy of that one individual is the policy of the whole class. A single book will in this case afford exemplification of it, sufficient for the purpose may be found in the compass of a single work. In England, in this state has this branch of public instruction been in the hands of Blackstone for almost half a century. In the hands of that one potter, the governing part of the public mind, has been os much clay for all that length of time.

His is the only lawbook read by liberally educated men of all classes. The labour of reading this one lawbook is the price at which men think[?] to be quit of the obligation of looking into any other. Other lawbooks in countless and numbers, are written by lawyers for the use of lawyers. None of them are looked into by any man who has not the misfortune to be obliged to study them who has not duress to plead for it.
Similar Items
  • Title: [June 1805 Evidence Introd.]
    Description: June 1805

    Evidence

    Introd.

    Ch. Means

    ' 5. Weaker reason

    Section 5. 4. Weakening man's reasoning faculties

    In law, as in religion and government, the importance of this object[?] of policy is too obvious to stand in need of explanation. Strong and weak are relative terms. The strength on the one part, is as the weakness on the other. The weakness of the lay-devotee is the strength of the priest. The weakness of Louis the XIIIth was the strength of Richelieu: the weakness of Louis the XIV was the strength of Mazarin. Of the Duc de Mont[?] the Governor of one of the [...?], it was fairly said by Fontanelli, [...?] [...?] not a day but what he strove more and more to render himself unnecessary. The praise seems to have been merited: but Mont[?] was not to be depository of his [...?] power, nor ever looked to be.

    The congruity of this object in the character of a subordinate end being thus not of dispute, what remains for notice[?] are the means.

    The three preceding maxims /laws of policy/ are all subservient to this one. In addition to their respective particular uses, this use is common to them all. Keep the rule of action in the dark, discourage criticisms, promote blind admiration, be the subject what it may, what recipes can contribute more powerful towards producing the requisite object, producing a general prostration of strength in the patient the destined victim - the public mind?

    There remain two other medicaments of policy that have not yet been mentioned. 1. Inculcate in the mind of the pupil a blind reverence for antiquity in general: - for law, jurisprudential law not merely as the work of lawyers, but as the work of ancient lawyers. 2. Ply him with false wit: the particular species of false wit invented by lawyer craft for the lawyers. For though wit, true or false, is not argument, is not reason, either it may serve as a cloak to bad reason, or a substitute to good, and in either way /both may/ be conducive to the purpose.
  • Title: [13 April 1805 Evidence Securities]
    Description: 13 April 1805

    Evidence

    Securities

    ch Procedure Testimony

    3' Sinister interest --------- ------

    From exposure to the action of these sinister interests, from the natural and actual and unavoidable pursuit of these sinister objects, it follows, and beyond dispute, that, in situation, in operation, and in practice the class of men of law is composed of the natural enemies of mankind.

    Start not gentle reader: in this proposition, novel as it may seem, there is neither paradox, nor injustice: nor yet, in any degree approaching to what at first sight may be apparent, any peculiar reproach.

    All men, though in some points of view reciprocally natural friends and coadjutors are in some points of view, reciprocally natural rivals: all natural rivals are to a certain degree natural enemies /adversaries/. If the potter, according to an observation old as -----, is envious of the potter, the musician of the musician, it is because potter being a natural rival of potter, musician of musician, is to a certain degree his enemy.

    But there is a circumstance which distinguishes the emnity of the man of law towards all the other dupes taken together from the emnity of any one class or of any individual, or towards any of the rest. Potter is not in the power of potter, musician of musician, potter of musician, nor musician of potter: all, all alike, are under the power, and at the mercy of the man of law. The potter has never been able to force the man of law to buy his pots: the musician his music: potter and musician have from the very first and still continue to be forced by the man of law to buy law from him: to buy it, and at the price which he himself had been pleased to put upon it. Of potter and musician the mutual emnity has /has all along/ been restrained by a /kept under by a/ common yoke: of the lawyer toward the potter and musician, the emnity, under the ---- of power, has ---- into an unfeeling and unrelenting tyranny.
  • Title: [24 June 1811 3 V ad Juper[...?] Fallacies]
    Description: 24 June 1811 3 V ad Juper[...?]

    Fallacies Ch. | | Prosperity Chainers

    2 Exposure

    1 Politician at large

    Now it is that Imposture, in all its /his[?]/ stampes[?] Priest craft Lawyer-craft, King-craft, Orular[?]-craft/ opens its /his/ Magazines and pours forth all their /its/ /his/ stores

    Now it is that we hear of the Sanctity the inviolable sanctity of contracts of engagments in every shape Now it is that all the synonyms of the word engagement now it is that all the conjugates and quasi-conjugates if the word /substantive/ sanctity saint, sainted scared consecrated, consecration holy, holiness with their etiations[?] are brought out and set in array against the proposed obnoxious good, especially if there be any thing in it that can be accused of novelty in what soever shape it presumes to obtrude its unwelcome /odious/ presence.