date

3 June 1805 Evidence Introd
3 June 1805

Evidence

Introd.

Ch. Means

' 2. Laws concealed

'' 2. Maxim 1. Keep the rule of action in the dark.

Keeping the rule of action in the dark was the capital article of [...?] urged by Protestants against Catholics. In the matter of religion, the reasons pleaded in justification, the force[?], were if not preponderant, at least by no means to be despised /not destitute of plausibility, or even stronger/.

[marginal note: not to speak of Egyptian, Hindus, Lam[?], and other mystical religions.] On the ground of law, these reasons are altogether without application. Yet on this ground the endeavour has been little less strenuous than on the other.

In the origin of political communities /states/, the combat of force and fraud fills up the little time which the care /case/ of defence against destruction from without /foreign hostility/, leaves to spare. As the one or the other happens to prevail, the constitution takes its line. The Force could it but be exerted with consent, physical force being the prerogative of the many, fraud is the recourse and instrument of the few.

In the early days of Roman jurisprudence, the monopoly of leisure and literature, such as leisure and literature was in these days, thence into the hands of the Patricians, in manner already mentioned, the monopoly of judicature. [marginal note: Supra Ch. False Heads] In those days whatever other vices might have been abundant, hypocrisy was scarcely among the number. (Virtue[?] had as yet scarce learnt to extend its signification beyond the [...?] of courage.) (Men spoke plainly at least, howsoever coarsely.) Patricinus. In this book, this second volume, are the rules by which we intend to conduct ourselves in disposing[?] of your lives and fortunes[?]. Platinus. Good: let us look at it there there. Patricinus. No: that you shan't. While the dispute was going on a plebian stole a copy of this precious book, published it, and got good payment for it. What was to be done? Learned gentlemen cried down this book, and made another, like an Admiral of modern times, who when the enemy have captured his book of signals, sits down with his secretary and contrives /makes/ a set of fresh ones.
Similar Items
  • Title: [9 May 1805 Evidence Introd]
    Description: 9 May 1805

    Evidence

    Introd

    Ch Sinister End

    homologation

    Non. promulgation

    In days of yore /In the early ages of society, Fraud practiced /worked at/ her arts stark naked /without a cover/, naked as our first parents, and like them /our first parents/ too not ashamed. In the pretended virtuous age of Roman history, the man of law beholding in the invisibility of the rule of action the source of unbounded power and profit to himself, locked it up /kept it locked/ without [...?]. In the legal form /validity/ binding form/ of contracts he saw one of those necessary bonds without which political surety could not be kept together:the validity of all contracts he contrived to render dependent, (such was the cullibility of the barbarians he had to deal with) on their conformity to /the connection of those engagements with/ different scraps[?] of nonsense, the tenor of which being a [...?] in his custody was preserved or varied at his pleasure.

    In England once upon a time suppose the Speaker, suppose instead of sending a Statute to the press for publication, keeps it under lock and key in his own house, selling a sight of it for the best price that can be got, and putting words into it, or striking[?] words out of it, as he and his customers can agree. In depth of policy as well as honesty the practice thus fabled for the purpose of illustration would be the exact counterpart of the practice of the man of law in the best /brightest/ days of Roman jurisprudence.

    In Rome a sad mishap beset the profession: In an evil[?] a thief got in, and stole the book of forms: all hands, the few hands that could write, were set to work at copying them: it was as if, pursuing the fable a pirate had broken into the Speakers house, carried off the Parliament Rule /sacred parchment/ and committed the contents of it to the press.

    The distress suffered /damage sustained/ by the profession is easier imagined than described /calculated/: but the mischief was not of long continuance. The stolen forms were /nonsense was/ cried[?] down: fresh nonsense was manufactured in the room of it. the distress was like that of an Admiral whose signal book has been captured: the remedy was the same.
  • Title: [25 Oct 1805 Evidence Appropriate]
    Description: 25 Oct 1805

    Evidence

    Appropriate

    These questions therefore that in English jurisprudence present themselves in abundance, are capable of being comprized under the general head of questions relative to appropriate evidence, /work/ - not out of the nature the things /case/, but out of depraved and neglected state and condition of English law:

    1. Out of the negligence of the legislator in not furnishing the people with the document necessary for their information and guidance: the list of the several legal demands, with the Titles in which they are respectively to be granted.

    2. On the fraud and hypocrisy of the Judges /judicial fraternity/: who pretending to see a rule of action laid down every where where there is none, punish the suitors without caring and without mercy for the pretended transgressions of their imaginary rules. [barkmasters[?] of the low Egyptian race, who requiring of their vassals /slaves/ such bricks as are not to be made without straw, will keep back the supply of straw, yet punish men for not having made the bricks.]
  • Title: [8 Feb y 1808 Powers Se IV.]
    Description: 8 Feb y 1808

    Powers Se

    IV. days of Sitting

    A spectacle truly curious is to see /observe/ the confuzion and mischiefs in all shapes [...?] by the learned Memorialists as about to spring out of this /the/ arrangement thus in the lack of experience and common sense assumed to be the only possible one. The public fills /occupies/ three articles, almost the whole of the page.

    [...?] est [...?] in ellâ[?] Fortunâ. The hall[?] was a profit /prospect/. Where authorit is a force, reason on the

    same sits as an /needless //superfluous/ incumbrance, on the other side impotent: on both a nuisance and as such see the door of the attention shut against her face.