June 1805

Evidence

Intro.

Ch. Means

' 6. [...?] Morals.

' 3. 6. 5. Fifth point of policy. Corrupting the public morals - Debasing the moral frame.

It is not every modification of a vice and criminality that the man of law has an interest in rendering: unless in the score above mentioned, viz: that of increasing the number of crimes and other offences liable to be punished, and thence to be prosecuted and defended.

The vices which in the pursuit of the sinister ends of the profession have received the most official and most constant encouragement from the men of law, viz: the vice opposite to veracity, and the vice opposite to the love of justice. Finding it necessary to his own purposes and for his own, to make a sort of diet[?] drink, of both these poisoned cups, it became equally necessary to him to endeavour to mitigate the abhorrence of those poisons in other minds. Intentionally or unintentionally /Intend it or not intend it/, such in some degree could not but be the effect of his own practice. Example is not only itself a precept, but in efficacy beyond all precepts. Neither the prostitute nor the procuress can to any purpose pretend to preach with severity against the breach of chastity.

Of the practices /lines/ by which this policy has been pursued, or at least this effect produced much remains not to be said here. Under the heads of Fiction, and decisions on grounds foreign to the merits, they have both been laid in their proper colours before the public eye.
Similar Items
  • Title: [13 June 1805 Evidence Introd]
    Description: 13 June 1805

    Evidence

    Introd

    Ch. Procedure Technical

    ''.2. Ends (of the Technical)

    Seek Ye, said Jesus christ /saith Jesus/, seek ye the kingdom of heaven and his /its/ righteousness, and all these things (no matter to the present purpose what things, +) shall be added unto you: a precept which if delivered in modern times and in the language of modern times might have run thus. Honesty is the best policy: or thus: the rules of privity are also rules of prudence.

    The converse of this precept might have served in the shape of an instruction to the man of law. For kingdom of heaven put /read/ mammon or any other opposite kingdom, for righteousness, unrighteousness or more specifically extortion. Seek ye what is your direct, your primary object the kingdom of mammon (or in the rougher language of the century before the last the kingdom of hell and its unrighteousness (the unrighteousness that leads to it) and your secondary, your collateral object, ease, shall be added unto you.

    + Substitute
  • Title: [8 April 1805 Evidence Intro]
    Description: 8 April 1805

    Evidence

    Intro

    ch Lawyers' character

    ' Hypocrisy

    The effrontary of mountbanks is /became/ proverbial, and is considered as standing at the top of the scale. But compared with that of an English law-writer - a Coke, a Gilbert, or a Blackstone - it is modesty /all simplicity and diffidence/ /----/. No mountbank in magnification of his powder of ----, and of the virtues ---- in it, ever launched /-----/ into such extra----, as as uttered /bestowed every day/ by English lawyers upon the poisons of which they are the vendors and ---- for and which in such oppressive quantity are crammed by --- down the throats of a too passive people.
  • Title: [?? April 1805 Evidence Intro]
    Description: ?? April 1805

    Evidence

    Intro

    ch Lawyers' character

    ' Hypocrisy

    By a sort of conspiracy between craft and imbecillity, the imputation of utopianism, and -----ness /----/, has been attached to /fastened upon/ the few --- of mankind, whose labours are applied to the description of things as they ought to be /to the definition of the picture of things as they ought to be: to the endevour to improve /mitigate/ the condition of human nature. But if utopianism be understood to mean, as the ----- of the work which gives birth to it seems to require, the description /delineation/ of desirable effects represented as flowing from inappropriate or inadequate causes, utopianism is a term that would /should/ in England more particularly if not exclusively, be applied /considered/ no ex---- of the spirit which in the geography of law characterizes the pretended describers of things as they are - the Cokes, the Gilberts, and the Blackstones.

    In these the system of arrangements is portrayed as if not actually seated upon the pinnacle of perfection, at least fast approaching to the pinnacle /that station/ of perfection, wanting of any thing, nothing but a little ---- to put it in perfection of it /that/ part. How should it be otherwise? It is the work of men of law: of the sages of the law: the fruit of the ---- ----- lucubrations. To be governed, each man by his own interest, is the property of ordinary men - of every man who is not of the number of these sages. These men are not ordinary men: they are of quite another texture. They have no interest of their own: or if they had they would not regard it, they would not be governed by it. Their interest, the interest which on all occasions they are governed by, is /by, the only one they look to is/ no other than the interest of the community - the interests of justice. -- therefore who happens at any time to have the ----- to know what right is, has no more ---- than to show what they do: whatever they do is right: if for no other reason - and indeed there wants no other /and clearly there --- --- another/ - because they do it /it is they that do it.

    "The law is the perfection of reason: whatever is not reason is not law". Blackstone

    A record is a true /the proper/ diagram for the demonstration of right. Gilbert