date

8 July 1804 Procedure and Evidence
8 July 1804

Procedure and Evidence

Evil causes 4th order

5. Anti-merits substantive law

A piece of land - i.e. a pyramid of which the basis is the part in question of the earth's surface, and the apex a point coinciding with the earth's centre, can not (physically speaking) be carried off, nor therefore stolen. But what is predicted of/ true concerning/ a whole(?), may be predicted of each and every of its parts: therefore neither can any part of such estate be stolen: no stone, marble, ore of iron, lead, silver or gold that lies on it: no vegetable, no timber tree that grows in it as well as upon it: for all these things savour of the reality. But that which it is impossible for man to do, man ought not to be punished for: therefore for carrying off any thing that savours of the reality, a man ought not to be punished as for theft.

But no sooner when the attraction of cohesion, by which one part of the contents of the castle is bound to those contiguous to it, is departed, the savour of the reality is gone off from it. Therefore (the lawyers by whom this reason was invented know of no such words as cohesion and attraction - but this is what they meant) in this case /cases of this sort/ a man may steal, and a man may be punished for it.

The same reasoning has been applied to houses and their materials: - the same reasoning, accompanied by the same law. Ahab built a house with ivory: Nero covered a house with gold. Habitable or not, this ivory, this gold, would not have been larcenable.

A piece of parchment, since the atoms that composed it left the form of grass to become parcel of the ship's body, never has been parcel of any reality. But if it did - a form of conveyance bearing relation to a house or a piece of land has been written upon it, it contracts so strong a savour of the reality that it is as impossible to steal it, at least to commit larceny on it, as if it were so much growing grass.
Similar Items
  • Title: [31 Aug. 1801 Political Economy]
    Description: 31 Aug. 1801

    Political Economy

    A 3

    10

    * Method

    D

    Modifications of motion considered with reference to the course of the motion in

    each case may be distinguished in the first place into those which take place

    without actual contact, and those that do not take place without actual contact

    between the body or particle in which the motion originates and that to which it

    is communicated in the first instance. To the first class /head/ belong

    Attraction of gravity, /Gravitation/ /Attractions and repulsions that belong/

    Magnetism and Electricity: to the other, Animal motion i:e: motion produced by

    volition Attraction of cohesion, the motions in which vegetation consists, and

    the attractions called elective and repulsions the investigation of which

    belongs to the province of chemistry: to one or the other, as further

    examination may indicate /determine/, Galvanism.

    Expansion is encrease of repulsion as between particle and particle in a mass of

    expanding /-pansible/ matter.

    Contraction is diminution of such repulsion.

    Expansion and contraction are phænomena accompanying or constituting the passage

    of bodies from the state of solidity to the state of liquidity, and from either

    into the gaseous state /state of gas/ and vice versa, by the encrease and

    diminution of the quantity of caloric or heat.
  • Title: [1: 1800 Lords Commissioners of the]
    Description: 1: 1800

    Lords Commissioners of the Treasury}

    and

    Jeremy Bentham Esquire} Draught of Contract

    Amendments proposed

    on 31 Dec r 31 Dec r 1795 (a) and (a) Note printed

    by the Committee of the House of Commons on Finance in their 28 th

    Report dated 26 th June 1798.

    [Clause A. P]

    In the Preamble to Art. 1, in the room of the

    last paragraph or clause beginning thus "And Whereas

    "the said Lords Commissioners have accordingly fixed upon a

    "certain piece or parcel of ground for the purposes

    "of the said Act" insert as follows

    And whereas the said Lords Commissioners have accordingly

    fixed upon a certain Piece or Parcel of ground

    for the purposes of the said Act situate and being

    in the vicinity of the River Thames at or near

    to the place called Millbank in the Liberty of

    Westminster and partly in the Parish of S t Mar

    in the several Parishes of S t Margarets Westminster

    S t John's Westminster and S t George's Hanover Square

    in the County of Middlesex, which said Piece or Parcel

    of Ground is composed of the several Lots or Parcels

    of Ground hereinafter particularized and described that

    is to say

    Lot A consisting of a Piece or Parcel of Land

    late the estate of James Marquis of Salisbury,

    bounded to the East by the Capital Messuage

    called Grosvenor House now in the occupation of the Right

    Hounourable — — Lord

    Viscount Belgrave with the Gardens and Field therewith

    occupied; to the South by the River Thames, to the West
  • Title: [7 Aug 1809. Parl. Reform Ch]
    Description: 7 Aug 1809.

    Parl. Reform

    Ch. Necessity Hume

    Humes concession

    2

    24

    To bring the propositions /ideas in question each of them/ to a precise point.

    To give correctness to the expressions, and perhaps to the ideas, some alteration /change/ will require to be made in some of the expressions: for David Hume, though a man of genius was seldom a close reasoner /had not the faculty of close reasoning/: a deficiency of which his general habit of scepticism was a consequence and a proof.

    1. Amendment 1. After the word gift, add with the power of taking it away at pleasure. By power of reward howsoever arbitrary power of reward for example by appointment to lucrative offices neither absolute power nor any thing approaching to absolute power, unless power of punishment, for example by power of inaction[?] in relation to those same offices, be conjoined with it. Witness the Kings of Poland who had always good things to give and in plenty, but without power of taking them away: not to speak of patent places here with us.

    2. Amendment the 2 d. Add more, or if any, yet not so much, but that the taking away of the quantity of property attached to the office / their respective offices/ would produce in their respective bosoms /respectively/ a sense of privation operating in the occasion in question in the

    character of a motive with a force too great to experience on that same occasion from the motives acting on the other side any effectual resistance.

    Without an amendment to this effect the supposition he makes would be a nugatory and useless one, not being altogether incapable of finding its exemplification any where. For in what possible state of things would /could/ the House of Commons now a days be composed any part of it of a set of men, each of whom on being dismissed from Office would feel his coat stripped off his back. Yes, if you go a few centuries back, viz. to the times when /back to the reign of Henry the 7 th, when/ under the name of liveries the retainers of the King or of a Baron wore uniforms and when the subsistence of many a brave gentleman depended on the overplus grass of a common for his cattle, or of the overplus meat in his Majesty's or his Lordship's kitchens, for the more immediate source of his sustenance.