13 April 1805

Evidence

Securities

ch Procedure Testimony

3' Sinister interest --------- ------

From exposure to the action of these sinister interests, from the natural and actual and unavoidable pursuit of these sinister objects, it follows, and beyond dispute, that, in situation, in operation, and in practice the class of men of law is composed of the natural enemies of mankind.

Start not gentle reader: in this proposition, novel as it may seem, there is neither paradox, nor injustice: nor yet, in any degree approaching to what at first sight may be apparent, any peculiar reproach.

All men, though in some points of view reciprocally natural friends and coadjutors are in some points of view, reciprocally natural rivals: all natural rivals are to a certain degree natural enemies /adversaries/. If the potter, according to an observation old as -----, is envious of the potter, the musician of the musician, it is because potter being a natural rival of potter, musician of musician, is to a certain degree his enemy.

But there is a circumstance which distinguishes the emnity of the man of law towards all the other dupes taken together from the emnity of any one class or of any individual, or towards any of the rest. Potter is not in the power of potter, musician of musician, potter of musician, nor musician of potter: all, all alike, are under the power, and at the mercy of the man of law. The potter has never been able to force the man of law to buy his pots: the musician his music: potter and musician have from the very first and still continue to be forced by the man of law to buy law from him: to buy it, and at the price which he himself had been pleased to put upon it. Of potter and musician the mutual emnity has /has all along/ been restrained by a /kept under by a/ common yoke: of the lawyer toward the potter and musician, the emnity, under the ---- of power, has ---- into an unfeeling and unrelenting tyranny.
Similar Items
  • Title: [30 Jan y 1804 Evidence Securities]
    Description: 30 Jan y 1804

    Evidence

    Securities

    Ch. Engl. Prolegomena

    '.1

    Ch. English Law. Introductory Observations

    In the Roman system /mode/ of regular procedure in relation to the extraction and receipt of testimony, we have seen /seeing/ a uniform system of incongruity and imperfection: a system deplorably not good for any case with inconsiderable exemptions, and those in themselves beneficial ones, but uniformly applied to all cases. We have seen It is radically and totally unfit for its purpose inconducive to its professed objects /ends/: but to that general unfitness[?] /mischief/ /imperfection/ it has not added /does not add/ the particular mischiefs of complication on the part of the system, nor the reproach of inconsistency on the part of those who act upon it /the men in power/.

    The reader will thus have before him a system which in respect of its leading factions /fundamental points/ may be seen to stand at the pinnacle of perfection: a system the excellence of which if not very clearly /distinctly/ understood is at least universally felt and recognized: recognized, and proclaimed with general /universal/ triumph and exultation: boasted of, and by the very men whose persuasion /correction/ of the exclusive excellence of it is most decidedly /frequently/ declared and acted upon in practice, in particular - occasioning[?] habitually departed /discarded/ from with the most unfeeling and [...?] indifference; habitually discarded, and exchanged for a system /mode/ which wherever it is if not exactly the same as the Roman mode above delineated is still worse.
  • Title: [26 Oct 1805 Evidence Securities]
    Description: 26 Oct 1805

    Evidence

    Securities

    Ch. Procedure Natural

    ''. Beneficial consequences

    4. The mode of correspondence between the parties and the Court for the purpose of the cause /suit/ so long as it lasts /throughout the whole of its continuance/ may be settled at once /in the first instance/, without any of those [...?] of notice on the one side or supoenas[?] on the other, or expensive and yet inadequate securities against both, which under the existing systems are such pregnant sources of expence and vexation to the parties of injustice through misdecision to him who is in the right, and of business and profit to lawyers of all classes.

    5. All the points in a cause will be brought forward at once for admission, or contestation, proof and decision at once, without being kept back to come out /as at present to be brought to view/ one after another in so may separate instruments of allegation for the benefit of the men of law who are employed in a variety of ways in the penning receipt, registration, examination, opposition or defence of them or in pronouncing judgment on the opposition and defence /them where thus opposed and defended/.

    6. Almost all causes the commencement or continuance of which is produced by mala fides on either side would disappear out of the list: the security of each i.e. his opinion of the justness of his cause, including the truth of the matters[?] of fact on which he rests his claim counterclaim or defense, being established not by gratuitous assumption, (a) nor yet by vague declaration no general terms, (b) but [...?] not by questions put by the adverse /opposite/ party in relation to all particulars.

    (a) As in English [...?] Law procedure in the Common Law Courts

    (b) As is the Oath of calumny of the Romanists
  • Title: [18 June 1805 Evidence Introd]
    Description: 18 June 1805

    Evidence

    Introd

    Ch. Procedure Technical

    ''.7. Writing abused

    Among the essential points of the technical system one that we have seen is the abuse of the art of writing. On this head a distinction requires to be made: for in the instance /regard to/ of this master art, on this as on so many other grounds, thin and delicate /slight/ are the particulars by which the abuse is divided from the use.

    The purposes /occasions/ the application of it to which comes under the head of use will be spoken of at large in the body of this work. + These are the registration of the few operations and instruments for which the natural system produces in the several cases a genuine demand: and where the expence is warranted by the importance of the cause or by the anxiety of the party who is willing to defray it, the registration of the evidence. meaning by evidence such information, whether it came from the parties, or from extraneous witnesses, such information for the truth /correctness/ of which such securities as are requisite, and as such are afforded by the natural system of procedure, are /have been/ applied.

    The abuse consists in the fabricating and registration of such /these/ /whatever/ useless instruments and operations and instruments as the technical system may have happened to superadd or substitute to the few that would be called for and exhibited under the natural system: together with such information true or false but for the verity of which no security is employed /applied/, such information true or false, as both parties either /purely/ from the obligation inferred[?] upon them by the regulation of the system, partly from /by/ the sinister policy of that one of the parties who is conscious of being in the wrong, have been led to furnish /exhibit/.

    Under the natural system whatever[?] writing is employed about the evidence succeeds /follows/ /comes after/ oral delivery of the testimony. and in neither more nor less than that testimony itself consigned to their [...?] under the technical system it either precedes /comes between or is substituted/ and is super[?] - [...?] [...?] added to the oral testimony, it also is substituted to it.

    Securities. Rules