date

17 May 1804 Evidence Forthcomingness
17 May 1804

Evidence

Forthcomingness

Ch Investigatorial

§ 4 Rule 3

2. In cases where a second hearing is necessary a definitive hearing is necessary, over and above the preparatory one, in the course of which testimony that has been heard already in the course of a preparatory examination, comes again to be heard on the occasion of a definitive general examination (as in the case of an English trial for a felony) it is of use that the Judge who pronounces and presides at the /such/ second examination of the same witness should have been present at the first examination of the same witness - why? because he will be better enabled in this case than he could have been otherwise /in this case he will be enabled in a degree in which he could not have been otherwise to judge of the consistency and thence of the veracity and correctness of the testimony given by the witness on the ultimate examination on the result of which the decision depends. On the first examination, a witness, whether party or extraneous witness is taken in a great measure unprepared, and comparatively speaking without being possessed of the data necessary for subservient to the purpose of concerting a plan of falshood: on this occasion the visible but undesirable part of his deportment constitutes an instructive fund of circumstantial evidence. + In any subsequent examination he has always time, and frequently data, for correcting his evidence otherwise than according to truth - for dropping or explaining away known falshoods improbabilities and self-contradictions. If the Judge present at the first /preparatory/ examination is not present at the definitive examination of the same witness, this fund, this highly instructive and unsuspicious fund of information is lost, and false lights will be apt to take its place.
Similar Items
  • Title: [21 April 1804 Evidence 1 o]
    Description: 21 April 1804

    Evidence

    1 o Enquiry modes

    The system of procedure may be divided in the first place into two sorts of courses /courses or forms/: the one simple, or say summary; the other complex.

    To what is here meant by the simple course of procedure belongs every case /cause/ which, without prejudice to justice (meaning the direct justice of the case) may receive its decision in the course of a single hearing or trial - in the course of a single attendance of the parties at the seat of judicature.

    To the head of what is meant by complex procedure - the complex course of procedure in all its variety of modifications belongs, every cause, it becomes necessary that more than one such hearing should take place.

    Some causes are ripe for decision at the first hearing: others may require any number of hearings before compleat and definitive justice can be done. To the complex species of procedure belongs of course every cause in which it becomes necessary for the ---- testimony - evidence from the same source to be exhibited more than once: exhibited for the purpose of the definition /---/ hearing the trial, in the character of ultimate evidence, after having been exhibited in the course of preparatory examination /procedure/ in the character of preparatory evidence.
  • Title: [21 May 1804 Evidence Forthcomingness]
    Description: 21 May 1804

    Evidence

    Forthcomingness

    Ch. Investigatorial Eng. Law

    §. Statue addition

    naturally be heard: and by the same means he would frequently gain such lights as would enable him with a reasonable prospect of success /advantage/ to summon in the character of a witness to be examined at the trial, this or that individual, of whose capacity to yield evidence he could not have been assured by any exertions of his own, unaided by the power of justice. But a course of preparatory inquiry thus conducted under the aid of judicial power is neither more nor less than what has been so /already/ frequently met to be designated by the name of investigatorial procedure. And thus without any care, and perhaps happily perhaps for justice, without observation /remark/ on the part of the sage of the law, a power crept silently /gradually sprung up/ into use /exercise/, by which without intending it they were enabled to hear the truth and thereby to do justice, in many a case in which had the business been conducted without variation in the plan chalked out by themselves /their own wisdom/, no such result would have taken place /would or could have been obtained/.

    The [...?] thus /once/ laid, accession chrystallized around it with out difficulty: the private towns of the Country Magistrate became the radiant point of judicial truth, the sanctuary of justice. In the year 1554 by a statue of Philip and Mary, an act of the legislator was passed, from which the practice of preliminary /preparatory/ examination, under the name of examination took its rise. It extended to all offences of the rank of felony: but it went no further: it descended no lower in the penal law: it extended to no species of non penal suit. By these statutes a person being apprehended for felony, was /is/, before he was either bailed or committed for trial, t be examined before the Justice to /before/ whom he was /is/ thus brought: the result of the examination is to be committed to writing: and the writing transmitted to the Court in which the trial is to take place. Another examination to be taken, under a requisition added by the same statutes is that of the persons by whom the defendant was thus brought. To these are now added, no

    1 & 2 P. & M. C. 13 §.h.5

    2 & 3 P & M. C. 10

    A o 1555
  • Title: [1 May 1804 Evidence Forthcomingness]
    Description: 1 May 1804

    Evidence

    Forthcomingness

    Ch.3. Means physical

    §.7.6. Adduction

    6 Adduction

    Adducture - adduction? whither? - to the seat of judicature. Subpoena [...?] [...?] - says the precept of the Judge addressed in the language of English law jurisprudence to the proposed witness, when commanded to repair to the place of trial the plan /scene/ of definitive hearing and examination - bringing with him the article /lot//source/ of written or real evidence, from which the evidence is proposed to be extracted.

    This operation, it is plain, is alike applicable to the case where a person alone, and the case where a thing, with or without a person having charge of it, is the proposed source of evidence. The case of its being /where the operation is/ performed upon a person, supposes reluctance on his part: at least in the most natural state of things, for though a thing will in general require /stand in need of/ a person to bring it, a person unless withheld by reluctance or infirmity will in the natural course of things, suffice to /be competent to the task of bringing/ himself. On the other hand suppose reluctance, (a disposition of mind which to a certain degree may be expected to be prevalent in one witness out of two or three) the operation of adduction may be necessitated, by reasons /demands/ of no less cogency, in the case of a witness for the purpose of securing forthcomingness with a view to evidence, on the part /than in the case/ of a party, for the purpose of securing justiciability.