date

18 March 1807 1 J.B. to [.
18 March 1807

1

J.B. to [...?]

Fellow Countrymen and Fellow-subjects

I have an offer of service to make to you. - of a sort of service which was never yet offered by any individual to any nation /people/ by any individual: and on terms on which it is not very usual for services of a nature equally laborious to be offered: how far it /the offer / promises to be worth your acceptance, it will rest with you to judge /what little it presents to your acceptance, you will judge./

I will state in the first place the nature of the service; and the need you have of it which in my view of the matter you have for it, and then something for I fear it will be thought necessary - something but as little as possible, of the individual by whom it is offered.

In Scotland far as long as most of you can remember, the state of the administration of justice has /had/ been not only a cause of suffering, but matter of complaint. At various times projects /designs/ were set in foot and even attempts made, for affording relief but all abortive. At length in /about/ April 1806 Lord Grenville being then at the head of a /the/ new formed Administration, one of them met with /was [...?] //received the honour of/ his acceptance. On One of /On his [...?]/ The Resolution which you all hear of even voted by the House of Lords.

On the occasion of that motion /In the course of his speech, duty compressed with the difficulty as well as the importance of the subject, he held out to all rich persons whose labours as presented himself to his notice as likely by their labours /assistance/ to contribute to the end /object/ in view, to come forward and render it.

Amongst others the hand /pen/ which now addresses you accepted the invitation. The work which was the fruit of it has for some time been submitted to /a candidate for/ your notice, under the title of Scotch Reform [...?].
Similar Items
  • Title: [1822 March 10 Codification Offer]
    Description: 1822 March 10

    Codification Offer

    J.B. to People

    Jeremy Bentham to all people professing liberal opinions - to the people and those who are in authority under them.

    Men and Brethren

    By this title ye are all embraced: and the embarrassment of looking out for other title saved.

    My desire is to receive from each your acceptance for that which if accepted will be to each the basis of a legislative rule, to all by whom it is accepted a bond of union.

    To any by whom liberal opinions are not so much as professed any thing that could be said from the author of a proposal such as this would be plainly useless: to the deaf adder in any of his shapes the voice were that of a charmer /every thing that could be said in this [-------?]/ would be useless.

    By the /Of the/ phrases a people /government/ professing liberal opinions the import meant to be conveyed is not dubious /exposed to doubt/: a people a government professing to take the greatest happiness of the greatest number for the object and end in view of every thing it does /all its arrangements/

    Let not either self-regard or self-esteem be in the mind of any of you so cruel an enemy to self love /self-regard/ as to prevent any of you from receiving his share in that which would be a benefit to all. If in any shape the proffered service afford a hope of use, punish /let/ not any of you punish himself to punish him /for the pleasure of punishing the man/ who proffers it.

    Resist as many of you as are able /have strength enough/ a propensity so natural to human weakness.

    Superiority none that can be excluded from the case is claimed: none in addition to that without which the service could not be rendered: none but that which he who by practice has learnt /enabled himself/ to make a shoe possesses over /in comparison of/ him who for want of practice remains unable.
  • Title: [13 Aug. 1808 Arrangements Suggested III.]
    Description: 13 Aug. 1808 Arrangements Suggested III. Examine Accountants

    4 Case of un-reasonable - the truth to the Crimes epistolary is turned over to Inspectors.

    In the occasion of the individual Account which gave rise to these suggestions, through submission to this most searching as well as expeditious mode of scrutiny was offered - spontaneously and expressly offered - the offer was not accepted.

    Of the quantity of vexation hath to be produced [+] [+] by the exclusion of this most expeditious as well as searching mode of collecting evidence by this such forbearance an example may be seen in the quantity actually produced in this same individual case.

    Of the necessary communications withholden, as well as the irrelevent and on other accounts mindless questions put, and other requisitions made, a statement may be seen in the paper of Charges to which they have given birth. By a personal attendance and examination, had the offer on that head in that belief been accepted, all these sources of vexation could have been dried up at once.

    The vexation which in that case would have been no more those which might increasing attendance would have contained.

    Of the vexation that will have been actually produced, the part already included produced at different times incurred, reckoning the incidents arising out of it has been sufficient to fill up the space of considerably more than a month. As to the offer was there made, as above it amounted to nothing more than an eventual consent; no petition urging acceptance, being coupled with it. In fact I had no wish to see it accepted: my wishes being rather on the opposite side. Why? - because my object was to save as much as possible of time designed for other uses. What I took for granted was - that the unexceptionable evidence of extraneous witnesses, and that delivered in its best shape, would have received if not the same preference, at any rate the same acceptance in this as in the higher judicatories: in which case, the sources of this evidence having been already indicated by me in the first instance, viz. upon the face of the Account, a few lines from me, for the purpose of setting the times of attendance for the witnesses witnesses in the terms of their affidavits, would have been all that supposing the intercourse with an in the epistoliary mode, would have been necessary. On this supposition then by the acceptance of the offer no vexation, but rather a relief would have been produced.
  • Title: [1821 Nov. 18 Codification Offer /Proposal]
    Description: 1821 Nov. 18

    Codification Offer /Proposal/

    '.1. Advertisement

    '.2. Topics of this

    22 NovrWhat follows will it is supposed be superceded

    A work of the sort in question not being within the ordinary line of public business - being in fact the first of the sort that was ever proposed or perhaps so much as conceived - questions to the following effect present themselves as calling for answers

    1. In favour of the probability of your executing a work of this sort with advantage to your employers what presumptions are you able to produce. What In a word are your grounds of expectation in regard to acceptance. Say - Grounds of expectation what?

    2. Why not produce the work at once instead of thus offering to produce it? Say - Why instead of the work an offer only?

    3. Why thus make offer of it instead of waiting for its being spoken? Say - Invitation why not waited for?

    4. Your notions of what is best in the field of Constitutional law being plainly repugnant to the arrangements which in that part of the field of /which regards Constitutional/ law are already established in several of the Nations to which Your Proposal looks, what expectations can you entertain of any acceptance at the hands of their respective rulers either for what regards that part of the field or for what regards the two other parts of the field namely the Penal and the Civil.

    What acceptance can you look for, from Governments established on principles of Constitutional law different from yours? Say - From different principles what expectation of acceptance?