date

28 June 1806 Evidence │ │ Scotch Reform
28 June 1806

Evidence │ │ Scotch Reform

Facienda

Summary Court

A horse with a man or other burthen on his back to pull up a hill: take off the burthen, he is dragged down,

Locke's dinner[?] with his old trunk

I am aware that three Lordships, out of three to whose lot it should fall to sit /take up their quarters/ in this Summary Court, might find their business perhaps, in some respects his rather hard upon them.

Accustomed for so many years to travel on in the beaten /regular/ track in pursuit of the ends of judicature, they might find themselves a little at a loss if set down on a new and bye-road however short and level, with a direction to pursue /under an expectation of their pursuing/ the ends of judicature. Accustomed never to act but under a load of technical rules and formularies, they might find themselves in a condition resembling that of a horse who having a load behind him to drag up a steep hill, moves on, if not at a very quick at any rate at a regular rate so long as he has a rider or a pack of equal weight upon his back, but, should the rider dismount, or the pack be taken off, would find himself unable to get forwards /no longer able to set one foot before the other/.

But whatsoever embarrassments may /might/ attend the change, I see no difficulties /obstacles/ that ought to be regarded as insuperable.

In the English Court of Chancery, in which the number of Judges is reduced to one and justice not the worse for it, it is still the right, though of late years it has seldom if ever /and formerly though not in every/ been the practice │ │ recent times the frequent practice for the Judge of that most high Court on particular occasions to call in a Judge or two from the /neighbouring/ Courts in the neighbourhood to his assistance in the Court of Session in Scotland being the Judges of all work and seeing no equals, see no place to which at present they can send for occasional helpmates and assisters /and doing business in a mode of which no one has any sort of experience but themselves/.

Proceeding /Guided/ by this precedent, and by the light of the instruction it affords /In like and[?]/ it might be matter of accommodation at least if not of necessity to the supposed newly-seated Judges if this supposed newly erected Summary Court, for some little /[...?]/ at least in the outset of their career, and which the business, how simple[?] soever in [...?] to be now to them , to call in, even it only because a business would be so simple, to call in assistance and advice from some of the many though still too few Summary Court, already in existence.
Similar Items
  • Title: [Evidence 1[?] June 1805 Introd]
    Description: Evidence

    1[?] June 1805

    Introd

    Ch. Regular Useless

    Ch. Summary View of Regular Procedure

    Ch. Inability of the main body of Regular Procedure.

    Ch. Regular Procedure - the greatest part worse than useless.

    Taken as a standard and as a model, the system of summary procedure, with or without the addition of a part of the penal branch regular procedure, will serve for the /a not unuseful/ diversion and approbation of the main body of the regular system as applied to non-penal causes. The useless part of the technical system of procedure is equal to the difference between that and the summary.

    The business of the Common Law Courts may be distinguished /divided/ in the first instance into three great masses; -

    1. The business done in the Offices by Attorneys.

    2. The business done in Courts in Term time, upon Motions made by Advocates.

    3. The business done at Trials: of in Town Causes partly at the metropolis in Westminster Hall and the London Guild hall, so the house is in both instances at this [...?]: in Country Causes, in /at the home of/ the several Circuits, in the several Assize Towns.

    Of those three masses /branches/ the third is composed in toto of real indispensable business.

    The two proceeding ones may with little exception be set down to the account of made business, or sham-business.

    Of the business included in the first branch has nothing that corresponds to it in summary procedure. Yet has one thing ever been found to object to Summary Procedure? Of all the several ends of justice, is there a single one that is not much more effectively [...?] /fulfilled/ and attained by Summary than by regular? What then was the real design and intention of that branch of the business? We have seen already. To make business and profit immediately for subordinate officers and Attorneys: ultimately profit with little or no business for Judges: not to speak of the casual profit proposed for Advocates.
  • Title: [[168-181v] 31 December 1807]
    Description: [168-181v]

    31 December 1807

    Abstract

    The physuical power of the House, as dependent on the quantity of applicable time, hearing already [...?] under the load of business imposed on it by that part of the function of general superintendence which has been habitually exercised by it till of late years, is of course still more decidedly unequal in any ulterior burthen.

    But of this demand a part of which has then been forced to overview the quantity of time cabaple of being apprehended[?] to the discharge of it by the House itself, the whole might find an adequate suply in the more ample quantity capable of being allotted to it by the proposed Court of Lords Delegates; a tribunal [...?] of all other business, and sitting in such terms as would render the whole of its official time applicable for this purpose.

    The mass of remuneration which on other accounts would, it is suposed, be deemed unnecessary/necessary[?] to be allotted in the members of a tribunal, so [...?] with power, and exalted as dignity, would be sufficient to enable the public to call upon them in return, for a degree of [...?] not inferior to that which [...?] to be habitual[?] on the part of others /other Judges/. And the greater in extent and [...?] the service thus rendered, the more secure would be the requisite deprivation[?] on the part of the public at large, as well as of the coordinate authority, to submitt without regret to the burthen that would be to be imposed by the requisite expence.
  • Title: [25 Oct r 1807 L d Eldon's Bill]
    Description: 25 Oct r 1807

    L d Eldon's Bill

    '.8.

    Senior Judges

    Another incident, nor that altogether an improbable one. In this unfortunate division, which has no Judge either to preside in it, or to sit at the head of it, some how or other by agreement among the Judges, whether by a regular election as under '.2. or by acknowledgement of the Jure divino right of succession claimed by the next in seniority go on with the business of their office. But now in its turn the seeds of dissention spread themselves through the diminished /reduced/ population of this Division (i.e. Court) and a division /takes place/ with equal numbers on both sides takes place. What now is to be done? To terminate the division the same process that was carried on /took place/ before requires to be repeated, though in the contrary direction. A cross-call requires now to be made. Shall it be obeyed or not /be obeyed/? If obeyed to whom shall it be made and by whom shall it be obeyed? Shall this diminished Division take back its own Judge again, or receive one of the Judges that belong to the other? Dire must be the distress, endless the doubts and difficulties: and while the unhappy divisions between which an interminable division has thus been excited /stirred up/ are distracting /tormenting/ themselves to find or rather make a sense for an Act which has none of its own, the business of justice is at a stand: and the great misfortune is that unless for clearing up all these difficulties of which the two Inner Houses are the scene /theatre/ the learned Judges can find a decent reason /ground/ for ordering pleadings scriptural or oral by Advocates of the parties, at the expence of the parties, notwithstanding the vast [...?] thus given to the business, nobody is the better for it.