1
results found in
20 ms
Page 1
of 1
3 July 1811 6 V ad Juperbriam
Fallacies Ch. 1. Posterity-chainers
2 2
2. Exposition continued
Occasions parties
Or[?] As to the occasions on which the imposition of such restrictions have been or seems capable of being /likely to be/ attempted they seem comprizable under the following list
1. The establishment of any law by the sovereign with the concurrence of all persons and bodies of persons having part in the sovereignty /sovereign power/ at the time
2. /4/ In case of a compound sovereignty /composite sovereign body/ a New arrangement of its component powers amongst the members.
3. /2/ Concession made of privileges by the sovereignty or a principal member having power from the whole to the subjects in general.
4. /3/ Concession made as above to a particular subject or class of subjects.
5. Incorporative Union whereby two states having or not having one common head are by agreement put under one sovereignty.
6. Formation of a government, and thence of a sovereignty by individuals coming together in a state of independences.
Similar Items
-
Title: [3 July 1811 8 V ad Juperbriam Fallacies]Description: 3 July 1811 8 V ad Juperbriam Fallacies Ch | | Posterity-Chainers 4 4 2. Exposition continued Occasions parties 6. The 5\T thT\ case presents two or more sovereignties concerned: sovereignties not the less distinct though it should happen to one and the same person, in the character of principal member - or otherwise, to have a part in each of them.
-
Title: [3 July 1811 7 V. ad Juperbriam Fallacies]Description: 3 July 1811 7 V. ad Juperbriam Fallacies Ch. 1. Posterity-Chainers 3 3 2. Occasion Parties As to the persons /parties/ concerned - 1. In all six cases we have /stand/ the Members of the whole community who whether on the occasion in question any expression of will on their part has or has not place are in all those /these/ cases the parties in some way or other principally concerned in point of interest. 1. It is in the last case alone that any such expression of will actually has place. 2. In all cases but the last, we have as /in the character of/ a party already existing /in existence/ a sovereignty simple or composite 3. In the second case presents to view a composite sovereignty by the different Members of which an engagement of some sort or other is entered into. 3. The first and second cases present no to view /establish/ in the character of a third party the particular person or class of persons in whose favour (always by the sovereignty at the expence of the people in the character of subjects) the priveleges in question are enated[?] 5. The 4\T thT\ case puts in the place of the outer sovereignty addressing the expression of its will directly /in express terms/ to the people in the character of subjects, different branches of the sovereignty entering into in express terms an engagement amongst themselves, but by necessary implication addressing themselves tacitly to the people, for the purpose of inducing them to acquiesce in the new arrangement, and to modify their obedience /in/ according to to in conformity to the terms of it.
-
Title: [6 July 1811 29 V ad Juperbriam Fallacies]Description: 6 July 1811 29 V ad Juperbriam Fallacies Ch. | | Posterity Chainers 22 or 10 or 3 | | Due and plausible, when 1 Contract Note that in this case a further observation is that at all times whatsoever privileges or advantages (be the name employed what it may) the whole community is understood to be capable of receiving without prejudice to its own happiness /itself/ at the hands of the governing part of it those it ought at all times it ought to be /have/ in possession of. In this case therefore, if of the proposed change the effect be suppose to be that of giving increase the utmost practicable increase to the aggregate happiness of the community as above, compensation is thereby made nor is there either need of a room for compensation in any other Shape
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1