104_361.xml

Title: [26 June 1811 + 1 IX ad amicitium Fallacies]

Description: 26 June 1811 + 1 IX ad amicitium

Fallacies Ch. 1 Generalia

3

1. Exposition 1811

Correspondent to this whole class is the one fallacy of those ad viricundium[?], viz. Human-idol-trumpeters

 So far as concerns intelligence, look to arguments ad viricundiam as to probity to arguments as odium.

Either-Side Fallacies

Ch. | | Personalities laudatory.

' 1. Of the fallacies of this class conjunctively considered.

Of the fallacies that belong this little will be /need/ to be said.

Related in the way of contrast and opposition to those of the class last preceding, it so far /they so far/ corresponds with /to/ the fallacies of that class, and each fallacy in the one might accordingly be expected to have its counterpart in a /some/ fallacy belonging to the other.

This /Any such/ expectation however will be but indifferently fulfilled: On the part of the speaker orf writer, goodwill /the will/ is much more /less/ ingenious than ill-will /the opposite dissocial affection/ On the part of the hearer or reader the impressions made by it are less deep /much less vivid/.

 Go on and finish this in correspondency with the Chap ad odium when compleated

104_055.xml

Title: [8 Aug. 1811 9 Fallacies Ch. Classification]

Description: 8 Aug. 1811 9

Fallacies Ch. Classification

9

Allotting to the expression of those groupes of fallacies which appear /seem/ to apply themselves respectively to the imagination and the judgment the classical appellations of arguments ad imaginatonium[?] and arguments ad judicium, the following are the appellatives /denominations. that have presented themselves as capable of serving /applicable/ to characterize and distinguish the groupes /component/ /condividual[?]/ taht may be formed by the subdivision of the inordinately ample class the component elements of which would on the same plan /principle/ of denomination be termed arguments ad affectus. Arguments 1 ad vericundiam

2 ad quietum

3

ad socordiam

4

ad rectum[?] / sin timoriam[?]/ 5

ad superstitioriam

6 a superbriam 7 ad odium 8 ad amicitiam 9 ad invidentiam.

In the arranagement /distribution/ thus made imperfections will be found the removal of which, should the removal of them be found practicable and at the same time worth the trouble, must be left to some experter hand. The denominations themselves not in every instant sufficiently distant from each other: the articles ranged under them respectively not appertaining with a degree of prosperity sufficiently exclusive to the heads under which they are placed - To these objections not to mention others /no answer that appeared/ satisfactory answer has been found.

Imperfect as it is, the arrangement it is hoped will still it is hoped be found by the reflecting reader be found to be act altogether without its use

104_362.xml

Title: [25 June 1811 2 IX ad amicitium Fallacies]

Description: 25 June 1811 2 IX ad amicitium

Fallacies Ch. 1 Partiality

4

Note

(a)

Drawn up in correspondence with the list of the arguments ad odium that of the argument ad amicitium would stand as follows, viz.

1. Good-design ascribers /trumpeter's/ argument.

2. Good character ascriber's argument

3. Good-motive ascriber's argument.

4. Consistency-ascriber's argument

5. Good character-inferrers close argument, by /in the way of/ inference ex sociis.

6. /7/ Good character-inferrer's loose argumenty, by inference ex cognominibus.

6. Good-character-inferrers-loose argument by inference ex consentaniis.