1811 Aug. 4. ++ ad Juperbriam

Fallacies Fallacies Ch. 4. Excellence-haters

3 1

1. Exposition & Exposure

Ch

Ch | | Excellence-hater's or Excellence-abhorers or Perfectibility-denier's device.

 This after Popular-Corruption-pleader's? as cutting off all hope.

' 1. Exposition and Exposure

This fallacy is naturally and generally if not necessarily connected with another, viz. one of the modifications of the Vituperative-personality-utterer's fallacy /device/ viz. the Bad-principle inferrer's whose device /aphorism/ is noscitur ex consintatuis[?].

To say nakedly and bluntly - Excellence, perfection is the object of my abhorrence - it is for itself, for its own same that I abher it, would /might/ be too much for the effrontery even of this class of politicians[?]: too much to practice in the way of effrontery on the one hand /part/, too much to expect in the way of irrational acquiesence on the other.

Ask one of these abhorrer's of every thing that is most good why it is that he abhorrs it - his answer is ready /at hand/ - This is one of your French principles this is a principle that was maintained by Your Preistly, Your Condorcet, Your Godwin &c &c.
Similar Items
  • Title: [3 July 1811 8 V ad Juperbriam Fallacies]
    Description: 3 July 1811 8 V ad Juperbriam

    Fallacies Ch | | Posterity-Chainers

    4 4

    2. Exposition continued

    Occasions parties

    6. The 5\T thT\ case presents two or more sovereignties concerned: sovereignties not the less distinct though it should happen to one and the same person, in the character of principal member - or otherwise, to have a part in each of them.
  • Title: [9 July 1810 + ' 1 X. ad Juperbriam]
    Description: 9 July 1810 + '

    1 X. ad Juperbriam

    Fallacies Ch | | Exposition or Exposure

    1. Influence. 2. Gallantry

    Ch. | | Cloud-climber's, or Logical-Highfliers device

    ' 1. Exposition and Exposure.

    When presented under its /any of its/ proper and peculiar name /denominations/ the thing /a thing which/ you have to defend is plainly indefensible, look out for /this device consists in devising/ some word - appellative of more extensive signification some word or appellative which in its signification included the signification of which has by accident or design been so constructed as to comprehend along with the indefensible object some other object which is generally /by the public eye/ /justly or unjustly/ /with or without reason/ regarded with favour or at any rate with indifference.

    By this means the terms /any marks/ of approbation which if bestowed upon the object under that name which is peculiar to it, would, instead of congenial approbation, be apt to excite on the part /throw /call/ forth from the breast/ of the auditor or reader sentiments of disapprobation, and aversion directed towards to the object in question and from thence also toward as it were by reflection yourself, may take their chance for being productive of the desired effect of the effect proposed to be accomplished.
  • Title: [25 June 1810 1810 June 25 ad Juperbriam]
    Description: 25 June 1810 1810 June 25 ad Juperbriam

    Fallacies Fallacies 2 Ch. | | Excellence-[...?]

    1. Exposition & Exposure

    Propose any thing which being at the same time that it is adverse to his particular interest is with reference to the general interest good, propose to him this good thing and if he be out of hope of persuading any body by any other means to look upon it as bad, he [...?] invitation[?] to you that for the very reason that it is so good it is execrably bad. For what is there that /of these deeds or measures/ which is these that is not a step towards perfection? a step in some way or other to it even [...?] short or[?] in[?] one? But to dare to take perfection for your mutle[?] /object/ though it be but to look at is to defile yourself with that pestilential /that athesistic[?]/ heresy.

    See Paradox-brandishers, Impracticability-criers, Self-contradictory No-thinkers, and Popular-corruption-pleaders fallacies.