date

20 Jan y 1810 Parl y. Reform
20 Jan y 1810

Parl y. Reform

Ch.1.

§.3.

16

6

 Add the case of the Electors.

Objector True, all this: mighty true. But is it worth /can it be worth the/ telling? can there be any use in stating it? Exists there that human being, at least of English race, who could entertain a doubt about it, or who could think of controverting it?

Author Oh yes: that there does: and in the seat of that authority which with reference to this subject is /occupies/ the very highest place which the country knows of /looks to/. But of this in another place. +

+ Infrà Ch.
Similar Items
  • Title: [21 Jan y. 1810 Parl y. Reform]
    Description: 21 Jan y. 1810

    Parl y. Reform

    Ch.2. Influence

    '.1

    6

    Objector. Do you admitt then that in the case in question a man's conduct may with propriety be determined by authority? - by intellectual authority, according to the explanation you have just been giving of it?

    Author. Most assuredly I do: and that by its being determined in this manner, not that I recommend this as the universally preferable mode the trust in question is not broken, nor the design of the institution counteracted.

    Objector. But how in this case is the description which you have above been giving /above given by you/ of the obligation attached to the trust conformed to? how in such case can it be said with true[?] that it is by the trustee's own understanding that any view of the matter has been taken?

    Author. {The conformity, you will see, is beyond dispute.} Yes: even in this case you will find that by the trustee's own understanding a view of the matter has even[?] in this case been taken: and that it is by that view, and the report made in consequence by his

    understanding that his will is determined.

    For is it not the work of understanding to form and pronounce a judgment on the strength of another man's? not to speak of that other judgment which to the one in question in many cases is so necessary an accompaniment viz. on the probity of the moral part of the same person's[?] frame[?] /mind/, and not merely of the general strength of the understanding but of the particular strength as applied to the particular subject in hand.
  • Title: [20 Jan y 1810 Parl y. Reform]
    Description: 20 Jan y 1810

    Parl y. Reform

    Ch.1. Character

    §.3.

    15

    5

    II. The interest /end/ which in this his character of trustee he ought to pursue, and in so far as that is the character he acts on does pursue, and that in preference to every other end, is the interest of the aggregate body, or in case of competition of the major part of those /the number/ his principals.

    If this be true two consequences /proposition be correct, two others/ follow from it as being included under it.

    1. That a Member of the House of Commons fails of acting /ceases to act/ in his character of trustee, as towards such his principals, in so far as the interest which in that his situation he looks to and pursues in preference is the interest either of any collection of individuals not comprized in the number of his principals, or even among that number, of any part less than the major part: in a word /particular/ of any rank in life, profession occupation, or party in the state.

    2. That he fails in a more egregious /enormous/ degree in a degree proportional to the smallness of the number in question as compared with the whole, when the interest which he thus looks to and pursues in preference is the interest of some one family or some one individual.

    This is as much to say, when in preference to a regard for the interest of the whole or the greater /major/ part of the number of his principals, he takes any such principles /considerations/ as friendship, private friendship for his motive.
  • Title: [[part in copyist's hand] 15[?] Jan]
    Description: [part in copyist's hand]

    15[?] Jan y. 1810

    Parl y. Reform

    Influence

    Ch. 1.

    '.1.

    2

    View taken by his understanding the erroneous, no abuse. Unfair [...?] there are if acting on understanding, but they can not be shut out, at least so compleatly as d o if acting upon will: all that act on will are unfair. If he [...?] to be acted upon with effect by the will of another, then the will of that other ought to be substituted to law.

    is the causing that determination /course of conduct/ to take place,

    Times 23 Jan. y 1810 Extract from the Statement said to be by authority and intituled

    "L d Melville & M r Perceval.

    "The following is circulated as a correct account of the correspondence which lately passed between Lord Melville & M r Perceval & the causes which led to it ....

    .... "Mr Perceval, who knows well the value of that aid which the practical talents & legitimate influence of Lord Melville could impart, found it necessary to apologize for abstaining from calling him into that ostensible public station, to which, by his abilities & his services, he acknowledged him to be to highly entitled."....