1
results found in
20 ms
Page 1
of 1
21 Jan 1817
Necessity Cat
I Theory
{II Application}
§ Probity
Sinister[?]
Factitious dignity
17
To cut the matter short - an without becoming pale with rage losing your temper calling me hard names and doing your utmost to ruin the man[?] who ministers it to you you say here of the American United States and even in the character of a government conducted itself tolerably well and[?] ever[?] in this or that particular affording an example not altogether […?] /unfit/ for consideration in with in[?] order[?] to emulation - can not you?
Q. I will say {at[?] it}at any rate: and you should not only look hard at me look me full in the face all the time but feel my pulse if you please. Well then. In the United States they have no such fund of factitious reward. Yet in point of […?] they have all along gone on tolerably well there; saving war making which we are making our […?]
And in […?] if the military service be considered and what is secretly[?] that branch of service in which extra meritorious service is most likely to be performed and for which extra reward is most in demand there was General Jackson by whom so good an account was given of the chief among the joint[?] victims of Bonaparte. No dukedom with enormous[?] estates linked to it had he in prospect - no not so much as a ribbon: and suppose he had an Archdukedom with in[?] time[?] as much money linked to it, think you that the service which in that case he would have rendered would by any determinate[?] amount[?] if exceeded that which he actually rendered?
Q. I suppose not.
Similar Items
-
Title: [[clxii. 173] 1820 May 23 Emancipation]Description: [clxii. 173] 1820 May 23 Emancipation Spanish '. 7. Rulers gainers '. 4. Rulers gainers 10 Factitious dignity Military Order The English with the Duke of Wellington at their head got the better of the French. But the United-States men with General Jackson at their head got the better of those who got the better of the French. Had General Jackson had in prospect the dukedom of Wellington with the hundreds of thousand annexed to it for fear of its going a begging would he have killed wounded or taken so much a single man more than he had? Let him who thinks he can produce a [...?] for this assertion produce it When of whatever nations composed two armies engage, unless it is a drawn battle one or other can not but have the advantage In pursuance of their constant system the ruling few heap reward upon reward with a profusion to which there is no bounds, and then the cry is see what is to be done by reward! behold the exalting power of reward! When opposite to a French army headed by a General /commander/ with a French dukedom and its etceteras in possession or expectancy, stood an English army headed by a Commander with an English dukedom in possession or expectancy, unless the battle was a drawn one the one or the other could not fail to get the better. In either case would it by the Dukedom that the effect would be produced: that effect which of no such thing as a Dukedom had on either side ever been heard of could not fail to have had place? Would it in this case be because he had a Dukedom in his eye that the victor became victor? as well might you say /it be said/ it was because he had a handkerchief in his pocket.
-
Title: [21 Jan y 1817 Necessity Cat]Description: 21 Jan y 1817 Necessity Cat {II Application} /I Theory/ 14 Q. < > Well but still you have not told me how it is that in the sort of hands in question remuneration in the shape in question viz factitious dignity presents in its nature likely in any degree to be preventive of extra meritorious public service? A. Fear not: your request /desire/ has not been forgotten. For extra-meritorious service rendered to the public you will allow /admitt I presume/ without much difficulty that natural reward is not altogether wanting? Q. < > By natural reward you mean doubtless that esteem and respect which at the hands of the public soever extraordinary in kind or degree rendered to the public at large can scarcely fail to receive? A. Of course I do: and this will in general, in so far as the service is known to the public, what at the most trifling expence it may in all cases be, will, run in tolerably /pretty/ exact /correct/ proportion to the magnitude of the service: and if not in every instance in the correct proportion, the public being composed of human beings and therefore to misconception and misjudgment yet in a proportion much more likely to be correct than if administered by a hand so much exposed to the misguidance of sinister interest as the Monarch or any of those who on this behalf are employed to act in his name.
-
Title: [21 Jan y 1817 Necessity Cat]Description: 21 Jan y 1817 Necessity Cat {II Application} /I Theory/ Factitious dignity 13 United States no factitious dignity If therefore any such desire should ever really be entertained as that excess, waste and peculation in this shape should be prevented - in the first place extra remuneration will be confined to extra meritorious service: in the next place no such extra remuneration will ever be conferred but upon proof made proof made of title to such extra remuneration as of title to an estate: made not only with equal publicity but with publicity more anxiously[?] and more effectually secured in this than it has ever hitherto been in that case. And in these conditions in the hands of a British Monarch the faculty of extra remuneration for extra meritorious service may with justice be /reason be/ regarded as being in a higher degree conducive than prejudicial to the universal interest. At an immature state /stage/ of society and government every thing is arbitrary punishment as well as pardon and remuneration: as improvement advances which it will not which it will not do as much so long as sinister interest in high places which has everything to lose by the advance can help it, pardon and remuneration will be subjected to the rules of evidence, as punishment and title to property are at present: but by that time, to rules of evidence, somewhat less inconsistent with each other and with the ascertainment of truth than those[?] which are in use at present, and have had no such object /have not had for their /in a/ principal end of any degree for their end/, but on the contrary the sinister interest of those by whom they have been framed.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1