1819 July 4

Defence of | | ag st Edinb gh Review

II Indirect attacks

5. Neology in general

All the above transgressions such as they are may be summed up in the generic offence which of late years though not by me has been characterize /designed/ by the name of neology, by those whose right to utter /employ/ to give birth and utterance to new words has not found any such body of hostile interest against it as mine has

For a general defence or at least apology against this general charge the following observations may perhaps be found not altogether inapposite

1. In the first place the liberty has never been exercised wantonly

2. In the next place where at the same time the subject is comparatively or absolutely of no importance, the new names are absolutely of no use nothing being expressed /designed/ by them that was not already designated as clearly and correctly by the existing stock the additions thus made to the stock of the language have been regarded either with approbation or at the worst with indifference.

3. In the third place in the whole of the physical department /department/ of the field of science,

4. In the fourth and last place in this very department, where no such adverse /sinister/ interests stand in the way of useful truth an /a most/ unbounded exercise of this privilege is regarded by men of all parties and all descriptions with unqualified satisfaction, and the usefulness of it is altogether out of dispute. What I allude /This refers/ to those names which with such unbroken constancy are given in the offices[?] belonging Honourable House itself and if not there in the Newspapers to Parliamentary Bills. +

+ ☞ Proceed to shew the use and necessity of such nomenclature
Similar Items
  • Title: [1819 July 4 Defence | | ag st Edinb]
    Description: 1819 July 4

    Defence | | ag st Edinb gh Review

    II Indirect attacks

    4 Appropriate aptitude

    1

    4. Appropriate aptitude – its branches 1. appropriate probity 2. appropriate intellectual aptitude appropriate active talent

    Before the course of my enquiries had led me to any such inquiry as that into the pretensions of the Whigs, I had found /seen/ /felt/ the necessity of fixing my own conceptions respecting the mental endowments or qualifications necessary to the due discharge of the functions belonging to this most important of all offices for the purpose of the enquiry by what means the possession of them might be most effectually secured, and the means of judging to /in/ what degree they were secured at present, and if not sufficiently by what new means they might be more effectually secured.

    In /Out of/ the aggregate of these several qualities I thereby formed a sort of test whereby the pretensions of any man or description of man to the confidence of the people, and thence to the possession of the situation in question might be tried and indicated.

    Unfortunately the pretensions of the Whigs would not abide /will not stand/ this test: the indication afforded by their application to the test is not favourable to the pretensions of the Whigs. Of their claim to confidence the foundation is composed of opu preeminent opulence – preeminent opulence in the shape of rent of land preeminent opulence in the shape of an anti-legal and anavowed[?] property in parliamentary seat conferring so many shares in the supreme power of the State: factitious dignity and reputation made out of ribbons and other gewgaws preeminent opulence produced by the merits or demerits of other people who lived in other times.

    Now
  • Title: [1819 July 6 Defence of | | ag st Edinb]
    Description: 1819 July 6

    Defence of | | ag st Edinb gh Review

    4

    That which Horne Tooke did not say, or did not choose to seem to say, is not the less true is – that when by correspondent payment made the burthen in question is borne, there remains to the man of property /proprietor/ a benefit in which the man of no property /non-proprietor/ has no share. But in this case by the supposition there is a benefit to be disposed of: a benefit, namely the portion of power in question. This being understood to whom according to the maxim invented by Horne Tooke should the grant of this benefit be granted? /made?/ to the non-proprietor uncontrovertibly: for as to the proprietor he has his benefit, and that a much more sensible one in another shape: and this a benefit in which the non-proprietor has no share.
  • Title: [1820 Feb. 29 Defence of Brad[?] ag]
    Description: 1820 Feb. 29

    Defence of Brad[?] ag st Ed. Review

    §. Paradoxes. 1. Tumult

    2

    2

    Tumult a good thing – learning a bad thing – such are the paradoxes which on this occasion {it will be seen} the Reviewer has felt or supposed the necessity of calling in to his assistance.

    Under the head of each I shall in the first place bring to view /shew/ in what way /shape/ it was that it would have /it must have been/ presented itself to his view as capable of rendering service to his cause.