date

1818 Aug. 6 + § 10 Parl Ref Bill
1818 Aug. 6 + § 10

Parl Ref Bill

Reasons

§.10 Election how

Voting secret why

New York

1

Morn g Chron. 6. Aug. 1818 Letter signed a British subject dated New York June 27 1817.

An account of the Election process as conducted in the State of New York has lately been made public in the Morning Chronicle of the 6 th of August 1818.

In principle it is the same with /agrees with/ that here proposed but in the means employed for the pursuance /attainment/ of the end there are some not very material differences may be observed /are observable/

For the security of freedom as well against seductive intimidation as against bribery and other alluring seduction secrecy is endeavoured to be given to the several suffrages, and ballot is the name employed.

Evils thus admitted 1. Miselection by subjection to undue influence

1. But the particular mode employed is – {not the dropping in of a counter which whoever may be the proposed Member meant to be favoured is exactly the same implement} but by | the dropping in of a ticket containing the name of the candidate meant to be favoured, / :/ and which / but the ticket/ may be in print, or in manuscript and in this case in the handwriting of the voter or of any other person, as the voter pleases. Suppose this influence to have place: by the person exercising it, the person on whom it is exercised may be required to give in in his own handwriting the name of the person voted for.

2. The persons on whose vigilance the security against fraud is reposed are – not the agents of the proposed Members – parties to the great cause, but a trio of official persons, named by other official persons.

On one of these three it depends what tickets shall be received and dropt into the box: if then he /they/ be to such a degree partial to this or that proposed Member, voters in any number may cause to be dropt into the box two tickets or perhaps more each of them having the effect of a vote. For those tickets which for secresy are to be delivered in ready folded, no precise form can therefore be prescribed, such as may be and is prescribed in the here-proposed mode.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1818 March 31 Parl. Ref. Proposed]
    Description: 1818 March 31

    Parl. Ref. Proposed Supplemental Resolutions

    1 o

    Supplemental

    Details

    20

    5

    11. That for securing by the only possible means the /its/ /the

    most perfect/ freedom of Election against undue influence in every shape, as well

    /whether/ alluring or intimidation, every such Election ought to be performed in the

    secret mode: and that for this purpose in every Election District, and if necessary

    in each one of a competent /sufficient/ number of Sub-Districts, a small appropriate

    receptacle, in which for example by a card or ticket dropt into a slot in a strong

    and fixt box, in circumstances in which it shall not be possible for any person other

    than the Voter himself to see or know in which of a number of boxes such card has

    been dropt, the Candidate in favour of whom such Vote was intended to be given shall

    be declared.

    N.B. The following article may probably be incorporated in a preceding one.

    12. That for prevention of fluctuation as aforesaid, no person

    should on any occasion have it in his power to vote in and for any Elections

    Districts more than one, that one being previously determined and notified /made/

    known by competent previous residence as aforesaid.
  • Title: [[copyist’s hand] 1818 June §.10]
    Description: [copyist’s hand]

    1818 June §.10

    Parl Ref Bill

    Tort[?] and Reasons

    § 10 Mode of Voting –

    India House

    Note here the mode of Balloting at the East India House. Though, in relation to the purpose here in question, not so compleatly well adapted as the one here proposed is supposed to be, it will be seen to be sufficiently so to obviate in the compleatest manner the objection of impracticability as applied to the secret mode.

    A number of Papers in writing or in print, all of them of the same size inscribed on one side with the names of the several candidates have been spread abroad upon a Table that the Voter may make his choice. Selecting thus the names of those for whom he intends to vote, he folds them up respectively and in the presence of some official person whose business it is to see that by no one voter any greater number of these Tickets are given in than there are of candidates drops them into a common box into which the votes of all the Voters together are received. This done, nothing more remains than to open the Box, display the Tickets and count the number of those which contain the names of the respective candidates.

    Of any want of efficiency on the part of this mode with relation to the occasion on which it is employed, no suspicion, it is said, has ever attached itself. But on the occasion here in question, certainty of dispatch within a given time is scarcely thus necessary than certainty of ultimate effect. To provide this certainty a species of appropriate Tactics seemed necessary: such is that which has in the above plan been aimed at.
  • Title: [1819 May 18 Disfranchise Ballot]
    Description: 1819 May 18

    Disfranchise

    Ballot

    J.B.s Mode

    9

    4

    Of any such official person the only possible use is the preventing the voter from dropping into the slit of the Receiving box more such voting Cards than one. For if to the satisfaction of all concerned this can be prevented, namely /for example/ by the place in which, for the inspection of the bystanders the card between the time of its being taken out of the choosing-box and the time of its being dropped into the Receiving box, the card is held up to public view, the time during which it is held

    Note

    up to view suppose /say/ five, ten or fifteen seconds of time, and the /his/ posture during that time say holding it up at arm’s length above his head, together with the dimensions of the slit in the Receiving-box into which it is dropt, it can be rendered sufficiently certain that he has not dropt in more voting cards than one, see[?] nothing is left for any such specially appointed Inspector to do, and that part of the machinery is useless.