date

1819 Sept. 22 Parl. Reform Bill
1819 Sept. 22

Parl. Reform Bill

Reasons ult o

§.2. Electors Who

Beginning

7

The Constitution! the Constitution! O matchless Constitution! What? are you an enemy to the Constitution? then are you an enemy to social order: and your wish is to destroy all property .... Such is the cry of those who by sinister interests by interest-begotten prejudice, by authority-begotten prejudice or by indigenous weakness are engaged in the defence of abuse in all its shapes – to the exclusion of the only efficient remedy.

To analyse the[?] idea this same Constitution – to examine, as above, into its normal component parts – to see by which of them that which is good in it /the good effects of it/ by which of them the evil effects of it are produced – this is a task which by no man it is believed has ever yet been steadily if at all engaged in it. The discerning few whose actuating motive is the sinister interest of which they themselves are conscious will not open their eyes or rather will not acknowledge what they see: the others who are led blindfold by them dare not open theirs /their eyes/

What good there is they see /blind as they are they feel/ they can not ascribe it to any part of the Monarchy by name: they see /feel/ that they can not ascribe any part of it to the Aristocracy by name. But the Monarchy forms part of the Constitution: the Aristocracy forms part of the Constitution: they magnify /la/ they laud they trumpet forth the Constitution: and thus it is that as it were by stealth they ascribe to each of those several parts those good effects in the production of which neither the one nor the other has any the least share.

☞ Insert the Balance?
Similar Items
  • Title: [[clxiv. 269] 1820. Sept r. 6]
    Description: [clxiv. 269]

    1820. Sept r. 6

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary.

    ?. Corruptive influence

    or Domination impossible?

    It follows not that because where circumstances admitt of it a Republic is the only good form of government, your rulers did wrong in putting up with a Monarchy or that they would not have done wrong had they tried for a republic. Had they made any such experiment, I can not /I feel how incompetent I am to/ see /see not/ what chance they could have had to bring /of bringing/ it to bear. Now the Mixt Monarchy is on its legs, as little do I see what chance there could be of preponderant good, from any attempt to overturn /overthrow/ it. All I mean to say is - that whatever change there is /should there be any change/, just so far as it operates in favour of the Monarchical or the Aristocratical part /Monarchy or Aristocracy/ its effects will be evil, just in so far as it operates /its operation is/ in favour of the power of the people, good: and that as by insensible changes when once established it can not fail to be brought nearer to /back in its way to/ despotism, so by sensible changes, so they be not violent ones when and as opportunity offers, to bring it nearer to republicanism, the opportunity should not be suffered to pass /let slip/ unimproved.
  • Title: [1819 Oct. 13 Parl. Reform Bill]
    Description: 1819 Oct. 13

    Parl. Reform Bill

    Reasons Prel. Obs.

    §.2 Electors who

    3

    Here it may be observed – but under the Constitution as it stands it may be said /says somebody/ neither is it Monarchical ascendancy, nor Aristocratical ascendancy, nor the ascendancy of Monarchy and Aristocracy (that has place) but the ascendancy of Monarchy Aristocracy and Democracy conjoined that has place – and accordingly it may be asked the ascendancy of Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy conjoined as under the Constitution as it stands is it incompatible with good Government.

    The answer here too is in the affirmative. See another N o in the Appendix N o | | Title Aristocracy and Democracy conjoined as under the Constitution as it stands is incompatible with good Government.

    [marginal heading:] Superseded

    {But even admitting that these forms are every one of them incompatible with good government, it will not absolutely follow it may be said either that Democracy or Democratical ascendancy in any form or at any rate in the form of radical reform as you present it or in one word radicalism is preferable and eligible. For any government, how bad so ever is better than none. And under /of/ radicalism as you present it would not the effect be the destruction of government, and there with the destruction of every good thing which it is the use of government to preserve?}

    Here the answer is in the negative. See another N o in the Appendix. N o | |. Title Radicalism not dangerous.
  • Title: [[clxiv. 252] 1820 Aug. 9 Emancipation]
    Description: [clxiv. 252]

    1820 Aug. 9

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    Corruptive influence

    BB Self preference in private life checked by sympathy, in public not unless by Democracy.

    The predominance of self-regarding interest over all social interest being thus necessary to the very existence of the species while the existence of others is necessary to the existence of each, hence arise the two opposite phaenomena /states of things/

    Every man /human being/ is the natural friend /enemy/ of every other

    Every human being is the natural enemy /friend/ of every other

    Every human being has in every other a natural friend /enemy/

    Every human being has in every other a natural enemy /friend/

    In private life by the sympathies which are among the causes and effects of natural relationship /affinity/, and by those others which are formed even between stranger and stranger by mutual wants and desires the amity is strengthened the enmity weakened.

    In public life, there is but one form of government by which any permanent strength can be given to the amity any permanent and effectual /considerable/ softening to the enmity: but one form of government, and that is a pure representative democracy, that invention which is worth all others put together: the product of a happy mixture of prudence, benevolence and good fortune in these latter times.

    In a pure monarchy all other interests are of course sacrificed to the interest real or supposed /fancied/ of the ruling one. The governed have in their governor /subject many behold and feel in their governor/ in chief an irresistible and implacable enemy in their governor in chief an enemy irresistible and implacable: and it is at the disposal of their enemy that every thing that is dear to them is for ever placed