date

[copyist’s hand] nd [wm 1818]
[copyist’s hand]

nd [wm 1818]

To Erskine

5.

In this same order, I now have to submitt to your Lordships these same alledged Whig Merits with a few remarks:

1. Liberticide wars opposed. Execrable indeed these same wars – But, bad is good, in so far as by comparison any war can be stiled good, whatever be the opposition, war will be seen to be opposed by it. Be it ever so necessary, War abroad will always be not only a bad thing, but the worst of all bad things, except despotism at home.

But no degree of readiness to oppose unnecessary war can exceed their readiness to make it. Under the notion of serving the Country where he was born, never was George the 2 d so eager to sacrifice to his ambition the welfare of that native Country of his which gave him a ducal, together with that of the Country which gave him a royal throne, as Charles Fox and Lord Grenville were to please George the 3 d who had never been there. “Witness Hanover and Hampshire”. The Eloquence of Charles Fox had provided him with a short word, with which he declared himself ready to justify any war, for any thing or for nothing, at any time. Witness Hanover: Witness, Glory: or, if neither be sufficient, | | both together. | | in, Johnson’s Every Man in his humour, was the prototype of Charles Fox. This, My Lord, was eloquence. – Ah was eloquence! Human comforts – human afflictions! – dull elements of calculation! how are ye looked down upon by eloquence!
Similar Items
  • Title: [1819 Mar 22 Lett II C + + To Erskine]
    Description: 1819 Mar 22 Lett II C + +

    To Erskine

    II. Whig Merits

    § 3. J. B.s Remarks

    9

    3

    7

    In this same order I now have to submitt to Your Lordship these same alledged Whig Merits with a few remarks.

    1 Liberticide Wars opposed. – Execrable indeed these same Wars. But, bad or good, in so far as by comparison any war can be stiled good, whatever be the Opposition, war will be sure to be opposed by it. Be it ever so necessary, war abroad will always be not only a bad thing, but the worst of all bad things except despotism at home.

    But no degree of readiness to oppose unnecessary war can exceed their readiness to make it. Under the notion of serving the country where he was born, never was George the 2 d so eager to sacrifice to his ambition the welfare of that native country of his which gave him a ducal, together with that of the country which gave him a royal throne, as Charles Fox and Lord Grenville were to please George the 3 d who had never been there. “Witness Hanover and Hampshire”. + The eloquence of Charles Fox had provided him with a short word, with which he declared himself ready to pallify any war, for any thing or for nothing, at any time. Witness, Honour: Witness, Glory: or, if neither be sufficient, witness both together. || Kestrel, in Johnson’s Every Man in his humour, was the prototype of Charles Fox. Oh rare eloquence! Human comforts – human affliction! – dull elements of calculation! how are ye looked down upon by eloquence!
  • Title: [[copyist’s hand] nd [wm 1818]]
    Description: [copyist’s hand]

    nd [wm 1818]

    To Erskine

    2

    Nay but, Sir – I think I hear your Lordship saying – surely Sir, with all your severity, one other deed of M r Windham’s may hope for your indulgence. When in 18 | | he preached against Law-Taxes, whose Book did he take for his text Book? take it and not only use it as such, but – such was his candour – make reference to it, and trumpet it. What say you Sir? Was there no merit in this?

    Alas! no my Lord. The answer has been already given. Good deeds as much as you please: merit none. All taxes are bad absolutely: the least bad is good comparatively. Every man cries out against taxes. No man sets himself any such task as that of comparing each tax with any other. One man cries out against one tax; another man against another: and in like way every man but he who takes the worst for his | | gives his protection to the worst. Windham in Administration, and Law Taxes proposed, think you he could not have supported them, as readily as he then opposed them. If before that he had opposed them, perhaps no: supporting them he would thus have exposed himself. No: he would have done as George Rose did, he would have gone out, or sat silent. In that same way I remember hearing – in that same way did he deal by this and that measure of Romilly’s. In the presence of Pitt, declaring himself and master convinced by that little work, George Rose declared to me at a dinner there should be no more Law Taxes. After Pitt, came Percevall, and then addition was made to Law Taxes. George Rose absent or silent. George Rose had industry. Yes. George Rose had good inclinations. So at least it was impossible for me not to think. George Rose would have put into my hands all | |. George Rose would have put into my hands all prisoners. George Rose would have put the poor of the Country into my hands. Pitt and Dundas would have done the same. A dinner day was appointed: but it never came. One man there was in the way: one man who was stronger than Rose, Pitt, and Dundas put together /them all/. After this when George Rose met in the street he never saw me. Was this anger? Never had he so much as imagined cause for it. No, My Lord, not anger: it was regret: it was compunction: not to say shame.

    George
  • Title: [nd -ta]
    Description: nd

    -ta <…> 7. 1.

    Instinctively <…> posts 7. 3. The Whigs

    Band of patriots now culminate

    as a worthless faction 7. 9. d o Fox at thei<…> A o 1793

    The Whigs A o 1793 & 1819

    Virtues and taling[?] 7. 22. The Whigs A o 1793 &c

    The calumniate Whigs of England 9. 1. The Whigs associated as Friends of

    the people A o 1792

    Excellent Paper drawn up by the

    Friends of the people 9. 29. George Rouse Barrister A o 1793

    Gave up his lucrative business

    and attended the old

    Bailey gratuitously – 11. 29.

    At the risk of his health. Erskine Barrister A o 1793[?]

    Noble exertions gainst the

    dangerouse doctrine of constructive

    treasons 12 14 Charles Fox A o 1794

    High character of his eloquence - 13. 21. M r. Gray 1793 (Now Earl)

    M r Gray 1793. Earl Gray 1819

    Honor, manliness and wisdom 13. 29 M r now Earl Gray 1793 to 1819

    Not to be misled, nor capable of

    misleading others by a vain

    thirst for popular applause – M r now[?] Earl Gray 1793 to 1819

    United and eloquent exertion - 15. 20 The Whigs. A o 1817 &c.

    Most unanswerable arguments

    ever delivered 16 7 Earl Grey. A o 1817

    Unblemished Gentleman 17. 24. Hon. G. Lamb A o 1819.

    Truly great man 18. 20 Charles Fox

    Illustrious life 18 21 Charles Fox

    Innocence and merit 18 24. M r Perry

    Spirit and eloquence that w d. have

    added lustre to the Bar – 19. 6 M r Perry

    Disinterested honest enlightened

    & independent 18 17 M r Perry