date

1819 June 16 To Erskine Lett
1819 June 16

To Erskine

Lett. 7. Whigs Anti Reformists

§.3. Pos. 2. No desire testified

3

What /That which/ could scarcely have been a secret to the most incurious among them is – that the real object of real contention – the power once gained it would have been in their power at any time to make a stand, and lay parliamentary reform still more easily than any other reform /reform in any other shape/, upon the shelf.

Simple as it was, when Pitt the second, the first of radical reformists came into power, even diminution of influence was – and without any sort of difficulty, laid upon the shelf. Diminution of influence? Oh yes and change in the state of the representation likewise. Compleatly by that rival of the Whigs /Tory, and then Whig/ in the caress[?] of consistency and sincerity was reform in both shapes laid upon the shelf. No less Compleatly was reform in both its shapes laid upon the shelf in 1806 upon the formation /advent/ of that which used to be called the Whig Ministry, but which henceforward, taught /instructed/ by Your Lordships incontrovertible evidence, we must call the Grenville Ministry. +

+ See M r Place’s Reply to Lord E. one[?] see M r H.s pamphlet p. | | and Lord E.’s Defence p.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1819 May 11 {C} E To Erskine]
    Description: 1819 May 11 {C} E

    To Erskine

    ult o

    Lett. 6. Whig anti Reform

    State of interest

    General challenge

    {3} 1

    22

    2

    The state of interests! the state of interests! theirs[?] is the true – the only true ground of argument. Honourable Gentlemen know it is: in vain would they deny it. On the memorable | | 1812 it was forced upon them /the book on which that ground was for the first time laid down/ by the Hon. ble M r Ward. The Whigs thought the triumph was there: they found they thus were triumph was over themselves: they were confounded After a pause like that in Pandæmonium Romilly at length acting the part of the ruler[?] of it rose for their conciliation: admirable was the prudence he displayed: neither party interest /connection/ nor personal friendship though so opposite to each other he could find cause for complaint: sorry he said he was for the part his friend had taken – sorry he truly was, and well he might be: Honourable House Tories and Whigs together was not dissatisfied: I, new /unpræcommunicated[?]/ and unexpected by me, was richly satisfied.

    [marginal insertion:] Yet were his party sorrow ever so sincere there was a mixture of public comfort as well as of private sympathy at the bottom of it.

    I repeat it – /Among those individ/ not an individual who possesses the faculty of thought (and it is not even one who does in any degree possess it) not an /a single/ individual to whom it can be unknown that the question has been placed upon that ground and that it is the only true ground. Not an individual unless M r Francis Burdett be an exception who dares argue the question upon that ground
  • Title: [1819 May 10 To Erskine ult]
    Description: 1819 May 10

    To Erskine

    ult o

    Lett 6. Whig Anti Reformers

    16

    5

    But the bulk of the people, tired of the war – a few because in their eyes it was unjust, more because to their pockets it was unprosperous looking about for the causes of its commencement or at any rate of its continuance, saw that sinister influence of the Crown as one of them it therefore called or at any rate wished for a diminution of this disastrous influence. To /For/ afford an eventual prospect of the eventual gratification of this wish was the memorable vote /Resolution/ of | | 1782 desired[?], moved and eventually carried: and being together with some accordant votes or measures carried it served as a proof to the Ministry then in possession /office/ that their /such/ possession was no longer tenable. They accordingly resigned and in the course of a few months the Opposition composed solely or chiefly of Whigs, slipt into their places.

    Here then was an engagement taken. When in that place, in fulfilment of that engagement what did they? Just nothing. Just what on this occasion, seeing before in the circumstances of the case, a mind versed in the art and science of human nature would have made sure of /predicted with full confidence/.
  • Title: [1819 Apr. 9 + § 6 {3} To Erskine]
    Description: 1819 Apr. 9 + § 6 {3}

    To Erskine

    ult o

    Lett. 6. E. AntiReformist

    § 5. 3. Reformists Luddites

    1

    30

    8

    That it was and is the desire of Ministry /Ministers/ that all persons endeavouring by petition to promote radical reform should be considered as Luddites and treated as such, is I suppose pretty well established. That while writing this defence it was /this was also/ Your Lordship’s desire is what I see more and more reason for concluding the more closely I examine it.

    This not being fit to be avowed and to every eye put out of doubt, salvo upon salvo I see accordingly employed by Your Lordships eloquence: but the more closely I view those salvos /the clauses in question/ the more thoroughly confirmed am I in my unpleasant conception, that they are mere salvos and nothing more.

    1. “With unexampled patience” and “the multitude, most implicated in those excesses, borne” (says Your Lordship p. 16.) all their privations and distresses”. In this state they were when “upon two points” (continues Your Lordship) they were imbued or rather maddened” What were these two points? “opposition to machinery, and the Reform of Parliament.” These points were “both of them destructive alike of their happiness and security”. What? absolutely at all times, in all places, in all cases? No: not exactly so, for then would the Whigs of England, and that conduct /those measures/ of theirs which at the time they were carried on were so full of merit, have been confounded with those malefactors: therefore {taken by itself /simply/} Reform of Parliament would not be quite so destructive to the happiness and security of the persons in question as the opposition to machinery conducted as it were /carried on as on the occasion in question/ by the destruction of the same. No: only in a particular case was the Reform of Parliament, including such measures as shall be necessary to the commencement and accomplishment of that change destructive in the manner and degree insinuated /brought to view/: in a /what/ particular case? in the case in question viz. that in which for the promotion of it endeavours were and by the same persons, at the same times, in the same places, on the same occasions, in the same views[?] with the destruction of machinery