1821. Jan y. 2 d. Part II Lett. 12.

Rid yourselves of Ultramaria

Part II

Lett. 10. Better Ultramaria [...?]

All this while, a question that can scarcely fail to present itself to an impartial observer, is - these and all other imaginable contributions, be they what they may, for what reason should they be exacted from Ultramaria for the profit of Spain, any more than from Spain, for the profit of Ultramaria? On what ground can the reciprocity be refused? But, if it be not refused, contributions from neither would be a much more economical mode than contributions from both: carriage both ways would thus be saved.

Now, if, to the eye of an impartial observer, equality is equity, what chance is ther of its failing for any length of time to be so, to any of those to whose injury the correspondent and opposite inequality would operate?

My friends! by shutting your own eyes, can you (do ye think?) shut, and deep shut for ever, so many millions of other eyes, and at such a distance?

Never, even in a purely self-regarding point of view,- never, to Spaniards, can the feelings, not therefore, the interests, of their Ultramarian kinsmen, be objects of indifference. Even supposing them not to have, on their own account, any claim to consideration on the part of the subject many in Spain they will still be found to possess an incontestable claim to such consideration, on the ground of the effect of the dominion on the interests of those same subject-many in Spain themselves. For, the more strongly adverse, in its very nature, so the interest of the Spanish Americans, is the dominion thus exercised over them, the stronger is the resistance, of which, on their part, in proportion as the opposition of interests is understood and felt, it can not but be expected to be productive.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1820 Decr. 31 To come in after p.]
    Description: 1820 Decr. 31

    To come in after p. 5 of the fair copy

    All this which a question that can scarcely fail to present itself to

    an impartial obsever, is - these and all other imaginable contributions, be they what

    they may, for what reason should they be exacted from Ultramaria for the profit of

    Spain, any more than from Spain for the profit of Ultramaria? On what ground can the

    reciprocity be refund?

    But if it be not refund, contributions from members would be a much

    more economic mode than contributions from both: carriage both ways would thus be

    saved.

    Now if to the eye of an impartial observer equality is equity, what

    chance is there of its failing for any length of time to be so, to any of those to

    whose injury the correspondent and opposite inequality would operate?

    My friends! by shutting your own eyes, can you (do you think?) shut

    and keep shut for ever so many millions of other eyes, and at such a distance?

    Never in a purely self-regarding point of view never to Spaniards can

    the feelings nor therefore the interests of their Ultramarian kinsmen be objects of

    difference?

    Never in a purely self-regarding point of view never to Spaniards can

    the feelings nor therefore the interests of their Ultramarian kinsmen be objects of

    indifference.

    Even supposing them not to have, on their own account, any claim to

    consideration on the part of the subject many in Spain, they will still be found to

    possess an incontestable claim to such consideration, on the ground of the effect of

    the dominion on the interests of those same subject many in

    Spain themselves. For, the more strongly adverse, in its very nature, to the interest

    of the Spanish Americans, is the dominion thus exercised over them, in proportion as

    the oppositon of interests is understood and felt, it can not but be expected to be

    productive.

    [clxxii. 450] 1820 Decr. 31

    Addendum to p. 4 of the fair copy.
  • Title: [1820 July 22 Emancipation Spanish]
    Description: 1820 July 22

    Emancipation Spanish

    Summary

    The reason will now be seen, why it is to the subject many, and not

    to the ruling few nor even indiscriminately to both that the papers of which this is

    the summary is addressed: nor could it have been written, but for the consideration,

    that of there can be an occasion, in which, in any country, the ruling few can

    prevail upon themselves, or be prevailed upon, to make any sacrifice whatever of

    their own narrower interest to the more extensive interest of the subject many, it is

    the occasion in which, as now, the ruling few may for a time, endure to regard

    themselves as standing in need of the support of the subject many for the very means

    of common safety, as well as far the means of maintaining themselves in their

    respective situations.

    9. As to the interests of the inhabitants of the distant

    dependencies, even supposing them not to have, on their own account, any claim to

    consideration on the part of the subject many in Spain, they will still be found to

    possess an incontestable claim to such consideration, on the ground of the effect of

    the dominion on the interests of those same subject many themselves. For,- the more

    strongly adverse in its very nature, to the interest of the Spanish Americans, is the

    dominion thus exercised over them, the stronger is the resistance of which, on their

    part, in proportion as the opposition of interests is understood and felt, it can not

    but be expected to be productive.

    Weak as are the strongest reasons that could be given why the rulers

    of either country should exercise dominion over the other, yet if for any such

    wide-stretching dominion there were any nceessity or use, reasons probably not less

    good might be given why it should be the ruling few in Spanish America that should

    exercise dominion over subject many and ruling few together in Spain, as why ruling

    few in Spain should exercise dominion over subject many and ruling few together in

    Spanish America.
  • Title: [[wrapper enfolding clxvii.240-56]]
    Description: [wrapper enfolding clxvii.240-56]

    Rid Yourselves. Aug. 1821

    Letter 5. Continued Ultramaria in submission impossible

    [verso]

    Rid Yourselves 31 March 1822

    Part 4

    Letter Cause Apprehension of the several branches correspondent to the several supposed sources of bencht looked for on the part of Spain.

    1. loss of profit by expenditure of Official Emolument savings - See see [...?] Ultramaria [...?] required

    2. loss by restriction on Ultramaria production and export prohibited for the sale of Spanish dealers.

    3. Forced military service. Export or Ultramarians for military service in Spain or elsewhere.

    4. Denial of justice by Appeal: Oppression by d o.

    [clxvii. 240]

    1821 Aug. 5

    Rid Yourselves

    Lett. 5,

    Continued submission impossible

    Letter 5. Continued Ultramarian Submission impossible

    Spaniards!

    You the subject many! You the great bulk of the Nation! never be it out of mind, it is to you I speak, on this occasion as on every other.

    From the claim kept up by your rulers in the dominion from the dominion over the whole of Ultramaria itself, if already in their hands, in respect of money no net profit can you receive: no saving can you make no, nor under the Code so much as a single receipt, of the repetition of which you could at any time entertain any well-grounded expectation: This I have already shown you. This was on the supposition of temporary submission and mutual satisfaction in consequence.

    At the time when any translation of this may chance to reach you - at that time, whatever it may be, you will see written what narrow limits in respect of extent of territory population and wealth the expectation of any such submission how short-lived so ever can have any tolerable ground.