JB_003_120.xml

Title: [1 Nov r 1800 Paper Mischief]

Description: 1 Nov r 1800

Paper Mischief

Ch. IV. Mischief Proved

10

labour (to any amount worth considering for the present purpose) but what is produced by money: what is more - the more money a man has the more labour he commands. What argument to appearance /at first view/ more conclusive, prove that the quantity of wealth existing in any community at any given time will be in proportion to the quantity of money that has been employed in the production of it? All this is true: yet after all it will be no less so, that the quantity of labour produced is not unless by accident in proportion to - does not depend upon the quantity of money employd in producing it.

Any quantity of wealth may be produced without any addition to the quantity of money.

Any addition may be made to the quantity of money in a country without making any addition to the quantity of other wealth.

In that one of two countries /periods/ which has most money true it is that in general there will be most wealth: and so as between time /place/ country/ and time / place/ country/ in the same country /period/ /time/ and that independently of any mines of the pretious metals contained in either. But in this case it is not the encrease in the quantity of money that is the cause of the encrease in the quantity of other wealth; but it is the encrease in the quantity of other wealth that is the cause of the encrease in the quantity of money. As a country without mines encreases its wealth, it encreases the amount of those masses of wealth which being collected each into[?] a single hand affords the owner a surplus by which /[…?/] he is enabled to procure foreign commodities, together masses of foreign money where with to procure more.

JB_003_118.xml

Title: [1 Nov. 1800 Paper Mischief]

Description: 1 Nov. 1800

Paper Mischief

Ch. IV. Mischief Proved

{7}/8/

The very fact of a rise of prices, when rightly considered, furnishes a proof - a short /summary/ but sufficiently conclusive proof - that the encrease of money has not been /it is not the encrease of money that has been/ productive of any encrease in the quantity of other wealth. Prices have risen 50 per cent: that is the same quantity of wealth that before the rise would have been sold for no more than £100 /£150/ million, now sells for £150 /£225/ million: take away then the the nominal addition produced to the nominal amount of the mass of other wealth by the encrease of money, there remains the real amount the same and no more as if the money had never come into the circulation.

JB_001_611v.xml

Title: [4 Novr.1800 Brouillon Paper]

Description: 4 Novr.1800

Brouillon

Paper Mischief

1*/5

* [Column 1]

Sinking Fund if a self-supporting Fund = Redemption of debt.

Provision is made by Government for the removal of the load of debt at the end

of a period of 40 or 50 years: Why not against[?] a cause of impoverishment of

([...?] partial as to classes affected) so much more powerful than national

debt?

Vendible

1. Individual

2. Aggregate

Aggregate

1. Physical—Land & Building

2. Ideal. Annuities &c.

Prefat. 1. Introd. Co-effects become[?] indexes—

When political economy is thoroughly understood and the relations between the

several phænomena/the matters of fact which constitute the subject matter of it

is clearly made out, and effects branching out from one & the same cause,

are traced to this their source each one of every such system of connectd

effects, will serve as a diagnostic and index to the rest.

By this means by means of a few [...?]/matters of fact [...?] public[?] in their

nature to be concealed, the eye of the politician may be able to penetrate into

the unknown[?] [...?] of affairs in a hostile state.

[Column 2]

Coining-Quasi

It is time to reclaim this stray prerogative which has thus long and thus

incautiously been suffered/to be [...?]/left in the hands of individuals.

The robbery committed by Bankers is peculation pro ratâ

A distinction that whether observed or no ought never to be unobserved by

criminalists, is that between peculation in toto and peculation pro ratâ. The

crime of Bankers, if it were one belongs to the latter head.

Revolution

A revolution in property—of the quiet kind—and yet setting aside the mischief of

disturbance &c little less extensive than the most turbulent ones known.

Fixed reduction of General rate of Interest.

Produces the mischief of encrease of money without the benefit.

[Column 3]

Price—measure of

The price of a particular article may rise to any degree without any addition to

the quantity of money in the country: do of all articles, not: but only in

proportion to the money.

No addition to the quantity of money would raise prices, supposing the addition

to wealth proportionable: therefore from the absolute addition to money must be

deducted the quantity equivalent to wealth, in estimating the cause and measure

of the rise.

Money Increase Ê Interest Decrease

An excess in the quantity of money serves to counter balance and check the

mischief resulting from the reduction of the rate of interest, which arises out

of the augmentation in the quantity of stock.

French Assignats

Produced the effect of money according to the price they were taken at

[Column 4]

Prices—how obtained

The quantity of money in circulation i:e: actually employd in buying can never

be worth more or less than quantity of commodities bought with/by it

The price of any sort of goods in two different years is the same thing with the

quantities of money given in the two respective years for the same quantity of

goods.

Therefore if in the second year the price of goods is double what it was in the

first) it follows and shews that the same quantity of money was in the second

year worth in goods but half of what it was in the first: if the whole of one[?]

quantity of money was worth the whole quantity of goods, the half of the money

is/was worth but the half of the goods of the same year and a given sum in the

second year was worth but half what

[Column 5]

what the same sum was worth in the first year.

A. Smith

Admitted that paper may have a tendency in a certain degree to expell cash but

not to its own amount: and so much as it fails of expelling to its own amount by

so much it must rise prices

It tends to expell cash—because as money grows cheap in the country and other

vendible commodities grow dear in proportion to what they are in other

countries, it becomes advantageous to send the money out to other countries in

exchange for goods. This is particularly the case of provisions of which the

real cost of production can not be so much diminished by machines as that of

Cloaths and furniture.

But in England this tendency is counteracted at both ends—

1. by the laws against exporting cash.

2. —against importing provisions.

[Column 6]

{A. Smith’s position is disproved to intuitive certainty by the simple fact of

the rise of prices}

What are the prices meant?

The prices given by consumers, the ultimate prices—or those given by Dealers the

intermediate or preliminary prices. or both together?

Semble the ultimate: these are what bear ration to income—so that the sum of

them is equal to the sum of income minus money saved and unemployd[?]

These ultimate prices, are the only prices felt.

The intermediate if they did not fall upon the ultimate would do no harm:—but

that is impossible.

No addition to wealth can be effected by any addition to money any otherwise

than by encreasing the proportion of enriching to impoverishing expenditure.

But in as much as fresh-inflowing paper money is added

[Column 7]

added in the first instance to capital i:e: employd in enriching expenditure,

does it not appear from hence that paper money adds something to wealth upon the

whole.

Error Sources.

{1. Case of individuals.

2. Sophistry of the language detracting from the value of paper money

3. —and of metallic money.

4. Accidental connection between encrease of money metal and paper and encrease

of wealth.}

5. Money raisable by paper which could not have been raisable without. ex. gr.

Bank of England. It is a mode of taxing without possibility of opposition to the

tax.

Coin

Forbidding export or melting of coin was in fact an act of Bankruptcy—stripping

the metal of its value—and reducing it to the condition of bad paper.

[Column 8]

A case might be put in which an addition to the quantity of money shall be not

merely accompanied by, but productive of an addition to wealth: and this without

any addition to prices or at least without a proportionable addition to

prices.

But the case thus put would not quadrate with the real state of things in

England.

Suppose money imported into the Scotch[?] Isles and employd[?] in fisheries.

Cases as between money and wealth.

1. Wealth encreasing money encreasing in the same proportion—No rise.

2. Wealth encreasing money encreasing in greater proportion—Rise.

3. Wealth encreasing. money encreasing but in less proportion—No rise but

fall.

4. Wealth encreasing—money decreasing—Greater fall.

[Column 9]

Cases continued

1. Wealth decreasing money decreasing in the same proportion—No fall

2. Wealth decreasing—Money decreasing in greater proportion—Rise.

3. Wealth decreasing—money decreasing but in a less proportion—No fall—but Rise.

Return of a state of things in which money should be stationary or

decreasing—

If the decrease were gradual no inconvenience would ensue—The[?] Rents would be

lowered—but prices of provisions would have been lowered first {Goods being

sold} The money as well as real price of exportable goods being lowered goods

would be exported to a larger amount or a revenue might be drawn from foreign

nations by taxes on Exports

[...?] bread basket stops.

[Column 10]

Data as between 2 points of Time 1750 & 1800

1. Quantity of wealth.

2. Quantity of money less—equal—or greater

3. Prices—higher—equal—or lower.

Known antecedently

1. Wealth/Income of 1750

2. Wealth/Income of 1800

3. Prices of 1750

4. Prices of 1800

5. Money of 1750

Known by inference

6. Money of 1800

Cases continued

1. Wealth stationary money stationary. No rise nor fall.

2. Wealth stationary—money encreasing. Rise

3. Wealth stationary money decreasing—Fall.