1
results found in
25 ms
Page 1
of 1
14 Dec 1801
Maximum
1
A maximum law would be in possession of one good property at least – it would
have the affections of the great body of the people for its support: all eyes
would be open to any violation of the law: all tongues ready to convey
/communicate/ intelligence of it Could the law but be so adjusted as to give an
compleat indemnity, though it were but a bare /mere/ indemnity for the necessary
expence of prosecution, reward over and above such indemnity would be scarcely
necessary to the engaging men to stand forth /lend their assistance/ in the
capacity of prosecutors and informers.
This would be no inconsiderable advantage. The ignominy /infamy/ /reproach/ which
vulgar /unthinking/ minds that /which/ is most minds, are so eager to fix upon
the character of him who lends his services to the public in the character of an
informer, would with at least equal reason be heaped upon him who lends his
services to the same law in the character of judge. If the being paid /receiving
payment/ for this service were a just cause of infamy, the judge should be the
more infamous of the two, as being the best paid as receiving the highest price.
That because a man will tell /speak the/ truth for a given sum, he will speak
falshood, he will committ perjury, and by so doing heap /that sort of perjury by
which/ punishment /is made to fall/ upon the head of the innocent – for the same
sum, is a proposition as absurd in a logical view as it is in a moral view it is
scandalous and injurious. Perjury for saving of the Guilty is but too abundant:
of perjury for the condemnation of the innocent, a fair example would scarcely
to be found. The informer is never in fault – never deserves otherwise than well
of his country howsoever the legislator his employer may deserve ill of it. Yet
among men in other respects
Similar Items
-
Title: [14 Decr 1801 Maximum 2]Description: 14 Decr 1801 Maximum 2 respects not altogether void of rationality, nor decidedly desirous of seeing the bonds of society burst asunder or dissolved – those bonds which for their hold /binding force/ depend altogether as much upon the prosecutor and informer as upon the Judge, the character /denomination/ /term/ of the informer, is to the disgrace of the age, still a denomination of disgrace. It is a blessing for mankind wherever as here the kingdom of senseless and mischievous prejudice is divided against itself: by this means the wretch called an informer, who in another case would not be endurable may obtain a sort of toleration, in consideration of the use he is of in bringing down the public vengeance /directing the slander[?]/ upon the head of the still worse /more obnoxious/ wretch, the seller of corn at a high price.
-
Title: [12 Dec: 1801 Maximum Beginning]Description: 12 Dec: 1801 Maximum Beginning Terms[?] 1 The mention of the article of money as one among the falsely supposed cases in point against the limitation of the price of corn /a maximum for corn/, brings to mind an incident which at the time was matter of some amusement to me. In combating I know not what unnamed antagonist, a Conductor of one of the Newspapers A newspaper conductor who /who with views such as I have been above disclaimed /just disclaiming as above// at the time had stood /been standing/ forth as an advocate for a maximum, finding himself incommoded, as it should seem, by some reference that had been made to the Defence of Usury. Having thus been brought into disgrace with the self-appointed diurnal Censor, this harmless production innocent certainly of any such crimes as were attempted /thus imputed/ to be fastened upon it, was to be tied about the ancles of the monsters /harpies/ who were seen praying upon the country in the shape of farmers and corndealers, and with them consigned to the pit of infamy. Abhorrence with its consequences was to be the doom of those to whom we are indebted for the necessaries of life, contempt was to be the portion of the “specious economist” in despite of whose theoretical reveries about money Judges had continued all along to do their duty. Little did he think than in this ebullition[?] of his zeal to destroy an imagined adversary, he had been aiming so cruel /desperate/ a stroke against an advocate on the same side. + Times 20 Novr 1800
-
Title: [1820. Octr. 12 Spanish liberticide measures]Description: 1820. Octr. 12 Spanish liberticide measures. 15 §. 2. I. Press violation Reasons against libel laws 4. If such things were allowed, no honest no honourable no honest man no man who had any regard for his honour for his reputation, would be found to take upon himself any such situation: and the consequence is that all such situations would fall into the hands of men who had neither honour nor honesty, and thus the country would be involved in certain and compleat destruction. So says the argument But of all this the contrary has been shewn already. Honest or dishonest, honourable or dishonourable, every man will be ready to take upon himself any /and to continue to occupy and to maintain himself a/ situation the evil of which is outweighed by the good. In England to a vast extent so prodigious is this preponderance, that to obtain these situations there is nothing so dishonourable that to obtain them men of all ranks from the highest to the lowest are not ready and eager to do, and do accordingly and are not the less stiled not only honest but honourable. Falshood solemn and deliberate falshood has been shewn to be a necessary step, perjury – perjury acknowledged by themselves to be such a commonly employed step /among the most frequent steps/ to the most richly endowed, the most powerful and most highly dignified situations in the Ecclesiastical and self-stiled religious establishment. In England no situation is in want of candidates: numerous and eager candidates: of whom in the instance of each such situation one /in each vacancy/ is succesful and when thus admitted ask any one of them, whether with a few accidental exceptions, of which his case does not form one, they are not, all of them honest and honourable. But in England though no such things as the things in question have ever been allowed allowed by law, yet such in that part of the law is the happy and useful weakness, so happily applied in that instance is the anarchy or the mixture of anarchy and tyranny of which so large a portion of the whole mass of law in that country is composed that the reputations of men in office are little less exposed to the sort of impuations of the sort in question than if they were allowed: and accordingly, and in the highest and most richly endowed and most powerful situations men may be seen wallowing and triumphing in profligacy, […?] in infamy, and yet as fondly attached to and as firmly fixt in their respective situations as if virtue in them were consummate. Commanders of torture spectators of torture encouragers and promoters of torture by refusing to hear and preventing the disclosure of it Commanders of the murder of the innocent rewarders of the murder of the innocent, commanders of torture, spectators of torture, forgers /fabricators/ of rules of pretended law to justify the murder of the innocent
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1