27th July 1801

Eden

Interest Notes

3

43[?]

paper which I should expect to see in circulation? So many points of distinction

as you have seen – (and I know not that they are all that might be seen) are

they not all together enough to constitute a difference? Is there any one of

them that does not constitute an advantage? Some of these advantages – the

principal ones – those which respect security – duration – rate of interest

facility of calculation are in the very page and sentence he referrs to,+

staring him in the face: but he fancies he annihilates them, when he shuts his

eyes.

In mentioning the rate of interest allowed by some of the Country Bankers, on

interest-bearing notes issued by them, I mentioned it for the principal if not

sole purpose, of shewing that an interest so much inferior – not only to the 5

per Cent more or less, afforded by the existing Government securities, but even

to the almost 3 per Cent proposed to be allowed by Government on the proposed

new Securities – actually met with individuals to accept it. I might have gone

further: for, to judge by what I have since heard, the example of

many

+ p.42.
Similar Items
  • Title: [27? July 1801 Eden Interest]
    Description: 27? July 1801

    Eden

    Interest Notes

    4

    44

    money lent to Bankers at much less than a real 3 per Cent or £2: 19s. per Cent,

    and without the convenience of a security susceptible of circulation – of the

    security afforded by an instrument promising payment to Bearer is still more in

    use. In Suffolk (I have it from Mr Arthur Young) the terms are these. For any

    sum under a £100, no interest allowed: if, after £500 deposited, a single

    sixpence is drawn out, the interest of one of the hundreds is struck off by that

    single sixpence. I rather think too – but am not sure – that, even in this case,

    certain conditions are added – convenient to the Banker inconvenient to the

    depositing Customer, and rendering the rate of interest less than what it seems:

    such as that of interests not commencing till after a certain time; or

    obligation of giving a certain length of notice before principal is drawn out.

    The case of the Bankers, as referred to in that part of my plan, was referred to

    only as an example: - an example of the demand already existing for this rate of

    interest, among the customers for temporary interest alone, in the present state

    of things, on terms of so much less advantage in comparison with mine. For a

    measure of the possible amount of such demand, on the part of that class of

    customers, under the proposed state of things, I took a much more extensive

    standard.

    In the very next page+ commences, under the different heads, a list of masses of

    money capable of being employ’d in the purchase of interest as afforded by the

    proposed Annuity Notes, supposing the holders to find their account in it: the

    example of these Bankers Notes is brought to shew (and does it not shew?) that

    people do find their account in purchasing interest-bearing paper, and do

    accordingly purchase and hold it, and pass it on from hand to hand, at terms of

    much less advantage. The true amplitude of the grounds of expectation with

    regard to the proposed paper is the amplitude not of the existing mass of

    Bankers’ interest-bearing paper – but of the aggregate of the the[?] masses of

    money there encountered.

    + Plan p.43
  • Title: [27th. July 1801 II + Eden]
    Description: 27th. July 1801

    II +

    Eden

    Interest Note

    1

    {3}41

    20. p.3

    Observations continued.

    II. “As to the new currency – The grounds of expectation (p.42) appear to be very

    narrow. The circulation of Banker’s paper, bearing interest, is mentioned as the

    principal one” (No such thing.) “Country Bankers indeed allow interest on

    deposits at their Banks; and some few may issue notes bearing interest. But in

    what part of England do such notes circulate to any considerable extent?”

    Counter-Observations.

    I know not, and I do not care – this question may be best answered by a string of

    other questions. – 1 In what part of England lives there a Banker whose security

    /is/ all over England is looked upon as being as good as /upon a par with/ that

    of Government? 2 In how many parts of England are there Bankers, that give,

    secured in the shape of interest-bearing notes, an interest which amounts in

    reality to so much as 3 per Cent? 3. In how many instances do these

    interest-bearing notes afford, like Exchequer Bills, even sums, or aliquot parts

    of even sums, for daily interest? 4. In how many instances are they adapted, by

    diversity of magnitude, to every diversity in the amount of the capacity for

    taking them on the part of individuals borrowing them or taking them in

    payment?
  • Title: [27th. July 1801 II + Eden]
    Description: 27th. July 1801

    II +

    Eden

    Interest Note

    2

    {3}42

    5. In what interest is the glance of inspection substituted to the toil of

    calculation? What Banker is there that could or would undertake that the

    continuance of the interest thus allowed should be coeval with that of the

    national debt? – 7. and – what is more – how many Bankers are there that can

    find their account on borrowing their money in driblets in this way, when they

    can get it in larger sums, or in sums of equal size secured by engagements not

    transferable to Bearer; - taking their profit by passing for value[?] notes that

    cost them nothing – that rise in even sums of convenient size – that – in regard

    to interest require neither calculation nor so much as inspection – that subject

    them, in a word, to no interest, and the amount of which is neither limited by

    the amount of the sums deposited with them on condition of paying interest – nor

    in short by any thing else, but their own prudence, and the facility of those

    who take this paper off their hands? – Where has the learned Baronet found – by

    what logic will he prove – that the circulation of Banker’s paper bearing

    interest is mentioned in my plan as the “principal” ground of expectation I rely

    on in respect of the circulation of the proposed Government Annuity Notes? – in

    this sense, at least, (which is the only apposite one) viz: that the amount of

    that private paper at present circulated constitutes the principal part of the

    amount of that mass of Annuity Note

    paper