1
results found in
16 ms
Page 1
of 1
13 Feb 1813 §.1 Part 4 +
Church
Ch 6
1
Part 4.
nor not necessary to adoptive persuasion
§. II abstract fitness
Part 4. Grounds of persuasion — Persuasion indigenous and adoptive.
Part 4. Difference between indigenous persuasion, and adoptive d o
The Difference between
indigenous & adoptive
belief, is in some
measure experienced by everyone
Of the Between indigenous persuasion
and adoptive persuasion, no man to whom the difference
must not have been made more or less known, by
his own perception and experience
Of the difference between indigenous persuasion
and adoptive persuasion, no man to whom in
this view it has ever happened to look into his own
mind - - who has ever
happened with
this view to look
into his own mind.
no man who has not had frequent - not to
say continual, - perception and experience
Be the matter what it may — matter of fact
or proposition — a man's persuasion in relation to it is may
be termed indigenous or say native, where it in so far as without
regard to any persuasion
regard to any persuasion entertained or supposed to have
been entertained in relation to that same subject by any
other person in relation to that same subject, it is the result
of the consideration bestowed upon the matter within
the precincts of his own mind.
Be it the subject
facts - or proposition
persuasion may
be termed indigenous
when it
is formed without regard to
the persuasion
of others
Note (a)
(a) Rather indigenous than native. Of itself all that native
imports, is - born somewhere: what indigenous imports, is - born
in that very place; - viz. the very place in question.
(a)
Indigenous better than
native. - native
implies only birth.
indigenous birth in
that very place.
Similar Items
-
Title: [14 Feb y 1813 + Church Ch.6]Description: 14 Feb y 1813 + Church Ch.6 8 Abstract Part 5. The forcibly deceptive process includes the upon it . Persuasion producible by the free deceptive process. without coercion. Hell & heaven the instruments Without the aid of any temporal coercive authority, by force borrowed from the religious sanction, it is not individual power may suffice out of the power of the individual to produce persuasion by what may be termed the free deceptive process freely deceptive exercise. or process of free deception. In the hands of time is whence while zeal is strong and knowledge is weak, for the production of persuasion by this process hell flames and heavenly joy, are instruments of experienced potency. Where coercion is employed, it is the forced deceptive process When coercive authority enters the field, and puts brings its force into in action as above, the process which it employs may be termed the process of forced deception or forcibly deceptive or deceptitious process (a) (a) Note in a separate page. While the forcibly deceptive process is carried on freely deceptive do is carried on at the same time by other hands spite of coercion indigenous persuasion and its adoptive following it breaks out. And authority is against all being thus pitted against authority, the hater of insincerity frequently the coercive deception, and takes to the self deceptive process. When the forcibly-deceptitious process has been carried goes on by one set of hands on, the freely deceptive process is by another set of hands naturally and consciously carried on along in conjunction with it. By the forcibly deceptitious process the production of a quantity of adoptive persuasion on the subject and on the side desired is as above, . but on the other hand, spite of whatsoever force may have been applied by the coercive authority for the suppression of it, indigenous persuasion on the side opposite to the authoritative side will here and there have broken out:- indigenous persuasion, by which with a probability in some measure proportioned to the rectitude correctness of such indigenous persuasion a quantity mass of adoptive persuasion operating on the same side will also have been produced. Here then will be authority against authority: reason against reason: argument against argument. Pressed between the forcibly-produced and the freely produced arguments, the mind which in any way finds itself called upon to make a declaration on the side expressed by force, will be apt to feel a sort of pain proportioned in its intensity to any laws which it may happen have happened to have contracted for the virtue of sincerity, to any aversion hatred which it may have happened to it to have contracted for the opposite vice. To For rid rid ridding itself as far as may be from this uneasiness, it has will find but one response, viz. in the freely- deceptive process the above described in this case in respect of the person by whom it is employed distinguishable by the name of the self-deceptive process.
-
Title: [14 Feb y 1813 Church Ch. 6.]Description: 14 Feb y 1813 Church Ch. 6. 2 p1. Part 4. In practice the persuasion which guides human conduct particularly in religion is of a mixt kind, - partly indigenous in part adoptive. In practice - in matters in general - and in matters of religion in particular — the persuasion by which human conduct is determined - the persuasion upon which a man acts, is very frequently — not to say most frequently - of the mixt kind: - partly indigenous, partly adoptive. Much time saved by acting on adoption belief By acting on adoptive persuasion, in general most commonly much time is saved! Be the subject what it may suppose any a mans declaration of persuasion an opinion in print — that declaration opinion the opinion of one whose judgment as declared is regarded as a competent and apt guide, the ascertaining it may be but a moments work. whereas the forming in relation to that same subject an indigenous opinion, even in a mind ever so well qualified for the formation of it may be the work of hours or days not to say months or years. Note (a) (a) Even mathematics adoptive the persuasion a man is often if not for the most part guided by. A mans refers without scruple to a work of note for a demonstration all parts of which are not in his mind. (a) Even on a mathematical subject — even in the mind of the ablest mathematician - the judgments on which he acts operates will in great part not to say for the most part in some degree of the adoptive kind. On the subject of this or that proposition he himself (suppose) has formed an opinion of the indigenous kind. But at the instant that he has need of it to build upon the demonstration is not — if it be a long one is not in all its parts — in his mind. Accordingly partly for his own satisfaction, partly for that of his expected readers, he makes reference to a plan some mathematical work of be quoted — say to Newton - where the demonstration is delivered at length.
-
Title: [1 Jan y 1812 Church Ch 6 II]Description: 1 Jan y 1812 Church Ch 6 II. 7 § 1. Part III Indigenous (4) (2) Here one of the senses of the word authority is employed. Where the persuasion is adoptive it may be said to have authority for its ground. Here may be seen on the occasion on which — one of the senses in which — the word authority is wont to be employed. In so far as it is of the adoptive kind the persuasion may be said is said to be formed on the ground of authority to have authority for its ground Authority the ground on which in the case of every even the most judicious man that ever lived, perhaps in the majority. of occasions during his life, his judgment is formed Authority is the ground on which, in the instance of every man, the most knowing and judicious that ever lived not excepted, the judgments on which he acts must on many occasions - perhaps on the greater part of the occasions that present themselves to him throughout the whole course of his life, be in a great degree formed. To exclude adoptive persuasion altogether is neither possible nor desirable. To exclude adoptive persuasion altogether - to exclude altogether that sort of circumstantial evidence which is composed of the supposed opinions of other people - is neither possible nor desirable. What is desirable, is, that in proportion to the importance of each question & the means of forming an indigenous judgment he should first apply himself to form an indigenous judgment, or, at least keep the door open to an appeal from any adoptive judgment he may form. What is desirable is — that in the point proportion to the of importance of each question and the means which a man has in his hands for forming, in relation to it a judgment or persuasion of the indigenous kind, a judgment, to wit such an one as to the purpose in question shall be sufficiently correct and compliant — he shall be constant on each occasion be mindful either to apply himself in the first instance to form in relation to it a judgment or persuasion of the indigenous kind, or at any rate keep the door open to an appeal made from any adoptive judgment it may happen to have to leave entertained, to his own indigenous judgment.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1