1821. April 2

Codification Offer

'7 Foreigner why

3. A third circumstance which should never be let slip out of mind, is - in

regard to the circumstances by which a demand for legislation is created, or

liable to be created, the distinction which has been already brought to view,

between those which are common to all countries, and those which are peculiar to

this or that country in particular: and in regard to these last, the reasons

which have been given in support of the conclusions that in comparison of the

former they are in pint of extent and thence in point of importance plainly

inferior and subordinate.

If so, ir follows that by attention, rightly bestowed upon the circumstances of a

universal complexion, there is nothing to hinder a person born and bred in a

foreign country, and who has never set foot in the country for which the Code is

in contemplation, from being better qualified for the drawing up of a Code, even

for that country, than any person who, having been born and bred in that same

country, has never set foot out of it.

But if equally well qualified in respect of appropriate intellectual aptitude,

and appropriate active talent, in respect of appropriate moral aptitude or

appropriate probity, the appropriate aptitude possessed by a foreigner is beyond

comparison greater than any that can have place in the situation of a native.

The native, by whom the sort of Code in question is drawn up, will either be a

person possessing a share in the powers of Government under the form of

Government at that time existing in the country, or a person acting under the

command of those by whom those powers are shared: in either case, to the desire

he can scarce fail to add the hope, and thence the endeavour, to sacrifice to an

interest of his own, the interest and happiness of the greatest number in that

country.

A foreigner, howsoever in other circumstances, he might have had the desire, can

not, unless gained over by the rulers of that country to their interest as

above, entertain any such hope, nor consequently be occupied in any such

endeavour.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[114-022v] 1821. April 14 Codification]
    Description: [114-022v]

    1821. April 14

    Codification Offer

    '7 Foreigner why

    Of the distinction between these universally-applying and these exclusively applying circumstances, the above examples will, it is hoped, be found to afford a conception sufficient for the purpose. The distinction is capable of being carried, and in the proposed case will be carried, all over the whole field of legislation. In this place, to pursue it further would be to force so much of the matter belonging to the proposed Code into a slight preliminary sketch extraneous to it.

    With whatsoever country the draughtsman be a native, these circumstances of universal occurrence and applicability, may be equally and perfectly present to his notice. For those shades of difference which are peculiar to his own country, he will, as compared with a foreigner to that country, be - if not exclusively, at least preferable, qualified. But suppose two men, the one a foreigner the other a native, and the foreigner more fully conversant with the circumstances of universal occurrence than the native, and in all other particulars better qualified for making, all over the field of legislation, that provision which those same circumstances require,- this supposed, it follows that to the foreigner it may happen to be best qualified, though not for filling up the outline in every part with his own hand, by particular arrangements in terminis, yet for giving, in regard to the aptest mode of filling it up, such apt instructions and suggestions as, though the mind of the foreigner would not have presented them to him, may with advantage be employed by him for his guidance.
  • Title: [1821. April 2 Codification Offer]
    Description: 1821. April 2

    Codification Offer

    '7 Foreigner why

    As by sinister interest moral aptitude may be affected and deteriorated, so, by prejudices, interest-begotten or otherwise derived, may intellectual aptitude. In any prejudices peculiar to the country in question, the foreigner, by the supposition, has no share. From prejudices imbibed in his own foreign country, no danger to the one in question can arise. In none of these prejudices will those persons, from whom alone the Code of his framing can derive its binding force, have any share.

    The national prejudices - the erroneous preconceived opinions derived from nationality,- whatever they may be, which may have exercised an influence more or less prejudicial on his work, will find ready prepared for them, a check, composed of the prepossessions, reasonable and erroneous together, of those on whom the work will have to depend for the acceptance given to it; at their hands it will not fail to receive any alterations which in the name of amendments they may be pleased to make in it.

    In the case where the draughtsman is a native, this check, useful as it can not be denied to be, has no place.

    (a) When Mill's History of British India first came out, it being advertised that

    the author had never set foot on any part of the country of which he gave the

    history - "What instruction can be got from this book by any of us who have

    [...?] or lived there was a question generally [...?] It had long made its

    appearance, before the acknowledgments became generally that no man who had ever

    been there possessed so clear, correct, or extensive a conception of the state

    and history of that country as the historian who had never set foot on any part

    of it.
  • Title: [1821 June 11 Codification Offer]
    Description: 1821 June 11

    Codification Offer

    '.7. Foreigner why

    Upon the whole the advantages promised by the choice of a foreigner on this

    occasion, in preference to a native, may be thus summed up -

    1. In its ultimate state, the Code will be less exposed to be vitiated by

    particular and thence sinister interests.

    2 It will be less exposed to be vitiated, by prejudices, appertaining to the

    country in relation to which it obtained the force of law: he being, by the

    supposition no partaker in them.

    3. The Draughtsman being with reference to that same country a foreigner,

    whatsoever prejudices imbibed by him in his own country it may happen to him to

    be a partaker in, will not be likely to be adopted and thus made to vitiate the

    Code: and thus it is that it will have the fairest chance possible of remaining

    as clear as possible of all pernicious prejudices.

    4. So far as regards positive intellectual aptitude and active talent, a

    comparatively unapt hand will be less likely to have been employed that if it

    had been the hand a native: the foreigner having neither recommendation nor

    support other than the reputation of preeminent appropriate aptitude.

    5. After its supposed completion as far as capable of being completed by the

    foreign hand, it will be most jealously watched and searchingly scrutinized into

    than it would have been had it been the work of a native hand: and thus

    whatsoever imperfections may have place in it will be more likely to receive

    correction in such other hands as it will have to pass through.