1
results found in
24 ms
Page 1
of 1
24 Aug 1801
A I
Polit. Economy
1
Method and Leading features for an Institute of Political Economy considered as
an Art.(a)
Objects or Ends in view - 1 Maximum of wealth 2 maximum of population.
I. Sponte Acta Cases in which and measures or operations by which the end is
promoted by individuals, acting of themselves, and without any special
interference {in this view (i:e in the view of the promotion of that end) on the
part of government}(b)
II. Agenda - Cases in which, and measures by which, that end may be promoted by
the hand of government.
III. Non Agenda - Cases in which, and measures by which, that end will not be
promoted by the hand of government.
II. Population
IV, V, VI. The same heads, {as with reference to wealth}.+
VII Finance. III. Wealth and Population together.
viz. matters of fact forming the subject of the [...?] [...?] Statisticks.
VIII. Noscenda - including Data and Danda. {Matters of fact, requisite to be
known as a ground for Agenda and Non-Agenda.} /reporters commissioned or
uncommissioned Government and [...?] furnish facts: if Adam Smith has in most
instances with a superior degree of success, set himself to trace /point/ out
the connection between those facts./ with a reference to the Agenda and
Non-Agenda with relation to which they may respectively be of use:(c) a
reference necessary to justify the expence, trouble and vexation attending the
collection in each instance.
(a) By Adam Smith, it is considered directly and constantly, only as a Science:
indirectly and occasionally only as an Art.
(b) In this is included the cases (actual and possible) for Preventions and
Patents.
(c) of Noscenda The most constructive indication I know of is that given by
Necker:[?] Ashmore[?] - Rex[?] Fin. Town[?] but without reference to particular
uses, as determined by particular Agenda or Non-Agenda. The most instructive
body of Data the world has yet seen is that furnished during Mr Pitt's
Administration principally by the House of Commons Committee of Finance of which
the pretended reimpression is but a mutilated extract.
+ Here, The Budget of Sponte Acta contains not much, but every thing: that of Non
Agenda every thing that the budget of Sponte acta contains. }
Similar Items
-
Title: [25 Aug 1801 0 A Polit. Economy]Description: 25 Aug 1801 0 A Polit. Economy Method 2 { Subjects for so many Books - I Wealth. I Sponte Acta: Steps taken by individuals of their own accord towards the encrease of the mass of natural wealth.+ {II Non-Agenda} II. Population The same heads. IV. Sponte actae every thing V. Non Agenda - almost every thing. VI. {Non}-Agenda - next to nothing. III. Finance Sponte Acta, now[?] - Remain VII, VIII Agenda and Non Agenda. Finance operates in toto in diminution of wealth: the object or end in view is to render the diminution as small as possible and as pure from collateral vexation and inconvenience in every shape IV. Weather, Population, and Finance, together Ineligible measures on the part of Government. Almost all that have been employed or proposed in this view. III Agenda. Eligible measures on the part of Government. In point of effect and importance, in importance of Sponte Acta, and Non Agenda, very inconsiderable. IX. Noscenda - i:e: Statisticks: including Data and Danda: between which the field of Noscenda is divided in portions which of course would be found different no[?] yet in each community and each portion of time. Collection and publication of Statistical Facts attended with expence, no institution should be set on foot for the furnishing of any such articles, without a previous indication of the benefit derivable from such knowledge, and a conviction that it will pay for the expence. But the expence necessary for one, may be sufficient for many. + The grounds of the distinction between Agenda and Non Agenda to be given under Agenda: under Non-Agenda, the particular measures, as compared with the above grounds.
-
Title: [[...?] Aug. 1801 Polit. Economy]Description: [...?] Aug. 1801 Polit. Economy A I Method 1. Sponte Acta 1 2 D I. Sponte Acta - Cases in which, and measures or operations by which the end is promoted, by individuals, acting for themselves; and without any special interference exercised with this special view on the part of government; any beyond the distribution made and maintained, and the protection afforded by the civil and penal branches of the Law. What the legislator and the Minister of the Interior have it in their power to do towards encrease either of wealth or population is in comparison with what is done of course, and without thinking of it by the Judge, and his assistant the Minister of Police. Inclination, knowledge, power knowledge - all concurring in the requisite degree, the effect takes place the end in view is accomplished; any one failing, it fails of being accomplished In general /In a general point of view/, inclination equal to the production of an unlimited quantity of wealth, can not be wanting: knowledge (a branch of power), as little, being the fruit of inclination, power - what is requisite of it beside knowledge - chiefly pecuniary capital has its limits in the instance of each individual - is of course wanting as to every thing beyond those limits, but can not be created by government as inclination and knowledge may, as it were out of nothing: it can not be given to any one individual without having been first taken to equal or rather greater amount from others.
-
Title: [[...?] March[?] 1804 Polit. Economy]Description: [...?] March[?] 1804 Polit. Economy Sponte acta { Ch. 2. Leading Features ' 5. Wealth I. Sponte acta The national wealth is the sum of the particular masses of the matter of wealth belonging respectively to the several individuals of whom the political community - the nation - is composed. Every atom of that matter added by any such individual to his own stock without being taken from that of any other individual is so much added to the stock of national wealth. To add to his own particular stock and to add in such period of time more than use or otherwise is taken from it in that same portion of time is with a very few exceptions, is the constant aim and occupation of every individual in every civilized nation. Enjoyment is the offspring of wealth; wealth of labour. What men want from government is - not incitement to labour, but security against disturbance: - security to each for his portion of the matter of wealth, while labouring to acquire it or occupied in enjoying it. For the purpose of encreasing wealth, individuals require neither to be forced to labour nor allured. The want of that which is not to be had without labour, is sufficient force: the assurance of being able to enjoy it is sufficient allurement. Leave men to themselves, each man is occupied either in the acquisition of wealth (the instrument of enjoyment) or in some actual enjoyment which in the eyes of the only competent[?] judge, is of more value. If idleness is to be discouraged, it is not because it is the non-acquisition of wealth, but because it is the source of crimes. Whoever takes upon him to add to national wealth by coercive and thence vexatious measures stands engaged to make out two propositions: 1. that more wealth will be produced by the coercion than would have been without it: 2. that the comfort flowing from the extra wealth thus produced, is more than equivalent to whatever vexation may be found attached to the measure by which it was produced.} {If Non agenda have been acta, the doing away of these malá acta may form so many additions to the catalogue of Agenda.}
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1