1
results found in
31 ms
Page 1
of 1
25 Aug 1801
0 A
Polit. Economy
Note
Method
Method
2
* (a) {By Adam Smith, it is considered, directly and constantly no otherwise than
as a science: indirectly only, and occasionally as an art. - Yet of what use is
the science, but with reference to the art?
Of population, nothing said by him. Yet of what use is wealth but with reference
to population: and how can either be considered in any comprehensive point of
view without the other: for quantity of wealth being given, degree of relative
opulence is inversely as population.}
(a) Novelty, whence encrease of variety in regard to instruments of mere
enjoyment - or articles of subsistence considered as instruments of enjoyment
add nothing to quantity of wealth, but leave it as it was, so far as the old are
superseded and kept out of existence by the new. Example new fruits and flowers
new stuffs new colours - new fashions for cloathing and furniture useful and
ornamental, new productions of the imitative arts. But in as far as novelty and
variety are sources of enjoyment, as these encrease, wealth encreases /so does
wealth/ if not in quantity, yet (what is good) in value.
Similar Items
-
Title: [25 Aug 1801 A Polit. Economy]Description: 25 Aug 1801 A Polit. Economy Method Method 1 { Method and Leading Features of an Institute of Political Economy (including Finance) considered as an Art.(a) ( - Adam Smith considered it only as a Science). Objects or Ends in view - Maximum of National Wealth - Maximum of Population. Uses of the matter of Wealth - 1. Provision for subsistence - present subsistence and Security in respect of future. 2. Provision for Security in respect of Defence - against external adversaries - internal adversaries - and calamities to which without human design the community is exposed. 3. Enjoyment - viz: mere enjoyment, as far as distinguishable from that share which is the natural {and} more or less inseparable accompaniment of subsistence and security. The modifications of the matter of wealth are correspondent to the above uses. 1. Articles of subsistence. 2. Instruments of security in respect of defence 3. Instruments of enjoyment. But enjoyment being inseparable from the application of the articles of subsistence to their respective uses, an article of subsistence is also an article of enjoyment. Encrease of population is desirable - as being an encrease of 1. the beings susceptible of enjoyment: 2. the beings capable of being employ'd as instruments of defence. It results of course from encrease of the means of subsistence and can not be carried beyond them.
-
Title: [30 Oct. 1801 27 Aug. 1801 C]Description: 30 Oct. 1801 27 Aug. 1801 C 3 Polit. Economy Method III. Non Agenda I. Broad Measures 3. Encouragement 4[?] Encreasing Land {3}6 Colonies 1 6. Colonization {is} {or at least was} was a folly grafted on a folly. Encouragement to new productive industry exercised at home, gave actual production /wealth/ for actual production /wealth/. Colonization, for actual wealth gives /gave nothing but/ contingent; contingent, which at the best was distant, and of which the realization was in all cases uncertain, in some hopeless. The capital employed in the exportation and maintenance of the colonists and their stock would if employ'd at home at any rate have added something to the annually growing wealth as well as population and thence the defencible security of the home territory, by the whole amount of it. Of the maintenance /produce/ of the Colonists when settled in the Colony it is only a part that would be exported to the home /mother/ country and constituted a portion of its /be added to the mass of its/ wealth. In point of wealth /quantity/ and population, Europe has lost by colonies. The only gain, if any, is that which consists in mere enjoyment, and that so far, and no farther, as it depends on novelty and variety in regard to the articles or instruments of enjoyment: the use of sugar /using sugar cane sugar/ instead of honey or beet or maple sugar - the making tea, coffee and chocolate breakfasts instead of the meat and ale breakfasts that contented Queen Elizabeth: the adding cochineal and indigo to our {blue} dies, instead of being confined to woad, Prussian Blue and a few others: the using: the using cochineal and garnetts for dying our clothes, instead of other reds of somewhat inferior brilliancy.
-
Title: [nd [wm 1800] 1 {Institute of]Description: nd [wm 1800] 1 {Institute of Political Economy - Method {& Leading Features.} Ch. 1. Method Method {and Leading Features} of an Institute of Political Economy(a) (including Finance) considered not only as a science, but as an Art.(b) Ch. I. Method ' 1. The Science - Precognita and Precognoscenda. I. Objects or Ends in view. 1. Maximum of National Wealth - 2. Maximum of Population. II Uses of the matter of Wealth(c) - I. Provision for Subsistence - present Subsistence - and Security in respect of future. II. Provision for Security in respect of Defence - viz against - 1. external adversaries - 2 - internal adversaries 3 calamities, to which, without human design, the community is exposed. III. Provision for Enjoyment:- viz mere enjoyment; as far as distinguishable from that share, which is the natural, and more or less inseparable, accompaniment of Subsistence and Security. 1. Provision for Defence against external adversaries is by administration of military force. 2. Provision for defence against internal adversaries is by administration of the power of Justice. 3. Provision for defence against calamities and minor physical inconveniences is by Administration of the power of the corresponding branch of the Police. Application of the matter of wealth to these cases belongs - not to Political Economy, but to other branches of political art and science:- Art and Science of War - Art and Science of Legislation. The Modifications of the matter of wealth are correspondent to the above Uses. 1. Articles of Subsistence. 2. Instruments of Security, in respect of Defence. 3. Instruments of Enjoyment. But, Enjoyment being inseparable from the application of the articles of Subsistence to their respective uses, an article of Subsistence is also an article of Enjoyment. Encrease of Population is desirable as being an encrease of 1. the Beings susceptible of Enjoyment - 2. the Beings capable of being employed as Instruments of Defence. It results of course from the encrease of the means of Subsistence; and cannot be carried beyond them. Note (a) The Outline of a projected work, drawn in the way of anticipation, differs greatly from the Outline of a finished work, drawn after completion. The following is something between both. (b) By Adam Smith, being considered directly as a Science, it is considered incidentally only as an Art. - Yet of what use is the science, but with reference to the art? Note (c) (c) From the faculty of being exchanged for one another, the several modifications of the matter of wealth derive a common nature, & in virtue of that nature are susceptible of this common name. Say matter of wealth, not wealth simply: for wealth excludes small portions, such as fall to the share of poverty.}
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1