25 Aug 1801

0 A

Polit. Economy

Note

Method

Method

2

* (a) {By Adam Smith, it is considered, directly and constantly no otherwise than

as a science: indirectly only, and occasionally as an art. - Yet of what use is

the science, but with reference to the art?

Of population, nothing said by him. Yet of what use is wealth but with reference

to population: and how can either be considered in any comprehensive point of

view without the other: for quantity of wealth being given, degree of relative

opulence is inversely as population.}

(a) Novelty, whence encrease of variety in regard to instruments of mere

enjoyment - or articles of subsistence considered as instruments of enjoyment

add nothing to quantity of wealth, but leave it as it was, so far as the old are

superseded and kept out of existence by the new. Example new fruits and flowers

new stuffs new colours - new fashions for cloathing and furniture useful and

ornamental, new productions of the imitative arts. But in as far as novelty and

variety are sources of enjoyment, as these encrease, wealth encreases /so does

wealth/ if not in quantity, yet (what is good) in value.
Similar Items
  • Title: [25 Aug 1801 A Polit. Economy]
    Description: 25 Aug 1801

    A

    Polit. Economy

    Method

    Method

    1

    { Method and Leading Features of an Institute of Political Economy (including

    Finance) considered as an Art.(a) ( - Adam Smith considered it only as a

    Science).

    Objects or Ends in view - Maximum of National Wealth - Maximum of Population.

    Uses of the matter of Wealth - 1. Provision for subsistence - present

    subsistence and Security in respect of future. 2. Provision for Security in

    respect of Defence - against external adversaries - internal adversaries - and

    calamities to which without human design the community is exposed. 3. Enjoyment

    - viz: mere enjoyment, as far as distinguishable from that share which is the

    natural {and} more or less inseparable accompaniment of subsistence and

    security.

    The modifications of the matter of wealth are correspondent to the above uses.

    1. Articles of subsistence. 2. Instruments of security in respect of defence 3.

    Instruments of enjoyment. But enjoyment being inseparable from the application

    of the articles of subsistence to their respective uses, an article of

    subsistence is also an article of enjoyment.

    Encrease of population is desirable - as being an encrease of 1. the beings

    susceptible of enjoyment: 2. the beings capable of being employ'd as instruments

    of defence. It results of course from encrease of the means of subsistence and

    can not be carried beyond them.
  • Title: [30 Oct. 1801 27 Aug. 1801 C]
    Description: 30 Oct. 1801

    27 Aug. 1801

    C 3

    Polit. Economy

    Method

    III. Non Agenda

    I. Broad Measures

    3. Encouragement

    4[?] Encreasing Land

    {3}6 Colonies

    1

    6. Colonization {is} {or at least was} was a folly grafted on a folly.

    Encouragement to new productive industry exercised at home, gave actual

    production /wealth/ for actual production /wealth/. Colonization, for actual

    wealth gives /gave nothing but/ contingent; contingent, which at the best was

    distant, and of which the realization was in all cases uncertain, in some

    hopeless. The capital employed in the exportation and maintenance of the

    colonists and their stock would if employ'd at home at any rate have added

    something to the annually growing wealth as well as population and thence the

    defencible security of the home territory, by the whole amount of it. Of the

    maintenance /produce/ of the Colonists when settled in the Colony it is only a

    part that would be exported to the home /mother/ country and constituted a

    portion of its /be added to the mass of its/ wealth.

    In point of wealth /quantity/ and population, Europe has lost by colonies. The

    only gain, if any, is that which consists in mere enjoyment, and that so far,

    and no farther, as it depends on novelty and variety in regard to the articles

    or instruments of enjoyment: the use of sugar /using sugar cane sugar/ instead

    of honey or beet or maple sugar - the making tea, coffee and chocolate

    breakfasts instead of the meat and ale breakfasts that contented Queen

    Elizabeth: the adding cochineal and indigo to our {blue} dies, instead of being

    confined to woad, Prussian Blue and a few others: the using: the using cochineal

    and garnetts for dying our clothes, instead of other reds of somewhat inferior

    brilliancy.
  • Title: [nd [wm 1800] 1 {Institute of]
    Description: nd [wm 1800]

    1

    {Institute of Political Economy - Method {& Leading Features.}

    Ch. 1. Method

    Method {and Leading Features} of an Institute of Political Economy(a) (including

    Finance) considered not only as a science, but as an Art.(b)

    Ch. I. Method

    ' 1. The Science - Precognita and Precognoscenda.

    I. Objects or Ends in view.

    1. Maximum of National Wealth - 2. Maximum of Population.

    II Uses of the matter of Wealth(c) - I. Provision for Subsistence - present

    Subsistence - and Security in respect of future.

    II. Provision for Security in respect of Defence - viz against - 1. external

    adversaries - 2 - internal adversaries 3 calamities, to which, without human

    design, the community is exposed.

    III. Provision for Enjoyment:- viz mere enjoyment; as far as distinguishable from

    that share, which is the natural, and more or less inseparable, accompaniment of

    Subsistence and Security.

    1. Provision for Defence against external adversaries is by administration of

    military force. 2. Provision for defence against internal adversaries is by

    administration of the power of Justice. 3. Provision for defence against

    calamities and minor physical inconveniences is by Administration of the power

    of the corresponding branch of the Police. Application of the matter of wealth

    to these cases belongs - not to Political Economy, but to other branches of

    political art and science:- Art and Science of War - Art and Science of

    Legislation.

    The Modifications of the matter of wealth are correspondent to the above Uses.

    1. Articles of Subsistence. 2. Instruments of Security, in respect of Defence.

    3. Instruments of Enjoyment. But, Enjoyment being inseparable from the

    application of the articles of Subsistence to their respective uses, an article

    of Subsistence is also an article of Enjoyment.

    Encrease of Population is desirable as being an encrease of 1. the Beings

    susceptible of Enjoyment - 2. the Beings capable of being employed as

    Instruments of Defence. It results of course from the encrease of the means of

    Subsistence; and cannot be carried beyond them.

    Note

    (a) The Outline of a projected work, drawn in the way of anticipation, differs

    greatly from the Outline of a finished work, drawn after completion. The

    following is something between both.

    (b) By Adam Smith, being considered directly as a Science, it is considered

    incidentally only as an Art. - Yet of what use is the science, but with

    reference to the art?

    Note (c)

    (c) From the faculty of being exchanged for one another, the several

    modifications of the matter of wealth derive a common nature, & in virtue of

    that nature are susceptible of this common name. Say matter of wealth, not

    wealth simply: for wealth excludes small portions, such as fall to the share of

    poverty.}