1
results found in
110 ms
Page 1
of 1
30 Oct 1801
A
Political Economy
Method
3
{Non-Agenda - I. Broad Measures. I Narrow Measures
I. Broad Measures- applying to all sources of wealth without distinction
I. Forced Frugality: Adding to National Capital (real capital) by money raised
on purpose: which must be by taxes. Of all ineligible measures, this is the
least ineligible, and most effective. The objection is that it is a defalcation
from individual property, without necessity.
When National Debt is paid off, it produces this effect, without the objection.
The money produced by taxes (imposed principally on income) is, in the buying in
or paying off of the Government Annuities, in which the debt consists, put into
the hands of the expelled Annuitants, who, to make it afford them an income as
before must employ it themselves in the shape of capital, or lend it to others
who will employ it in that shape.
II. Encreasing money: an indirect Income tax. Labour not money is the real
source of wealth All hands, being employ'd and employ'd in the most advantageous
manner, wealth could admitt of no further encrease: but money could be
encreasable ad infinitum.[Marginal note:] ? on Fixed-incomists. III
Reducing interest: viz: the lawful rate of interest on money borrowed by
individuals of individuals. A direct and (to the state) unproductive income-tax,
on those whose source of income arises out of a mass of money lent out at
interest. In Ireland, Ao 1788 or thereabouts this was proposed in the House of
Commons as a means of encreasing wealth, but rejected after a great struggle.
IV. Encreasing Land: viz: by Colonization: eligible when there is a prospect of
a deficiency of land with reference to population: ineligible in every other
point of view. The taxes borne by the Mother Country are not diminished by it,
but encreased. In the British Empire at least it is a principle that all
expences - establishments civil military, naval - and occasional wars - are to
be borne by the Mother Country. The capital employ'd in the cultivation of the
Colonies by the Mother Country, is so much sent out of it without adequate
return. Bryan Edwards, even in magnifying the utility of colonies, makes the
rati of profit upon capital so employ'd but 7 per Cent: the common calculation
gives for profit on capital employ'd within the Mother Country, 15 per Cent.
Whatever capital is bestowed upon this employment is so much taken from other
more lucrative ones.
Similar Items
-
Title: [nd [wm 1800] Ch. 2. Leading Features]Description: nd [wm 1800] Ch. 2. Leading Features. '.2. Wealth. 2. Non Agenda 4 2 Non Agenda may be distinguished into - I. Broad Measures - II. Narrow Measures. I. Broad Measures, applying to all sources of wealth, without distinction. I. Forced Frugality. Adding to National Capital (real capital) by money raised on purpose; which must be by Taxes. Of all ineligible measures this is the least ineligible, and most effective. The objection is - that it is a defalcation from individual property without necessity. The addition /collation/ how great soever the ratio of it to the defalcation /ablation/ is not compatible with justice: the defalcation is from the property of Paul; the addition is to the property of Peter.(a) II. Encreasing Money: an indirect Income Tax on fixed-incomists. Labour, not money, is the real source of wealth. All hands being employed, and employed in the most advantageous manner, wealth could admitt of no further encrease: but money would be encreasable ad infinitum.(b) III. reducing Interest: viz. the lawful rate of Interest of money, borrowed by individuals of individuals: - a direct and (to the state) unproductive Income-Tax, on those whose Income arises out of a mass of money lent out at Interest. In Ireland, in 1788 or thereabouts, this was proposed as a means of increasing wealth, but rejected after a {great} /hard/ struggle.(c) + IV. Increasing Land: viz. by Colonization: eligible, when there is a prospect of deficiency of land with reference to Population: ineligible, in every other point of view. The Taxes borne by the Mother Country are not diminished by it, but increased. In the British Empire at least, it is a principle - that all expences - in establishments civil, military, and naval, and occasional wars, are (a) Notes p.1 (b) Notes p.2. (c) Notes. p.3 + To Dumont. The defence of navy[?], which I sat over at the time contributed to throw out the measure: as Parnel[?] their Chancr of the Exchequer, very good [...?] to acknowledged [...?]. [Marginal note:] Interest is the price for the use of capital. As capital abounds becomes more abundant (in [...?] of [...?]) the price of it, as any other commodity lessens. By [...?] the price while [...?] should be permitted to }
-
Title: [31st Octr 180[...?] Polit Econ. Method]Description: 31st Octr 180[...?] Polit Econ. Method & Leading Features Ch.1. Method 5 61 IV. Encreasing Land. not diminished by it, but increased. {In the British Empire at least it is a principle - that all expences in establishments, civil, military, naval - and occasional wars, are to be borne by the Mother Country.-} The capital employed in the cultivation of the Colonies by the Mother Country is so much sent out of it, without adequate return. Bryan Edwards, even in magnifying the utility of colonies, makes the rate of profit upon capital so employed but 7 per cent: the common calculation gives, for the profit on capital employ'd within the Mother Country, 15 per cent. Whatever capital is bestowed upon this employment is so much taken from other more lucrative ones. Note Encrease of Money. Income-Tax, the effect of it. b Note The following is an Indication of the Indirect Income Tax, resulting from Increase of Money.- In Britain, Money is about 72,000,000; income (Ao 1801) about ,216,000,000 [72:216::1:3] Each million added to money, adds therefore three million for ever to pecuniary Income; and thus (setting aside the 15 per cent for ever (,150,000) for profit on the million if employed in the shape of capital) without addition to real income - if, in every year, ,2,000,000 be added to money, (plus ,300,000 for an equivalent to the addition made as above to real wealth) in 36 Years (Ao 1837) the nominal or pecuniary amount of a mass
-
Title: [nd [wm 1800] Ch. 2. Leading Features]Description: nd [wm 1800] Ch. 2. Leading Features. '.2. Wealth. 2. Non Agenda 5 3 to be borne by the Mother Country. The Capital employed in the cultivation of the Colonies by the Mother Country is so much sent out of it without adequate return. Bryan Edwards, even in magnifying the utility of Colonies, makes the rate of profit upon capital so employed but 7 per cent: the common calculation gives, for the profit on capital employed within the Mother Country, 15 per cent. Whatever capital is bestowed upon this employment, is so much taken from other more lucrative ones.(d) II. Narrow or Particular Measures: applying to particular sources of wealth. 1. Wealth being the produce of Capital, (which is no more than labour, employed through the intervention of money (pecuniary capital) or otherwise) and capital being limited (for labour at least is limited) whatever is given to any one such branch, is so much taken from the rest.(e) 2. If the encouragement be by donation of Capital - (of money to be employed in the shape of capital) - it belongs to the first head of Non Agenda, Forced Frugality. 3 An encouragement which is indefensible with reference to encrease of general wealth, may be eligible with reference to Subsistence (instance expence of Magazines for Corn):- or to National Defence:- (Instance - Measures for keeping up an extra-supply of Ships and Mariners.) (d) Notes. p.4. (e) Notes p.4. }
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1