1
results found in
40 ms
Page 1
of 1
23 June 1801
Polit. Economy
Analysis
Taxes
2
31
{7}
The amount of taxes imposed in discharge of debt of itself neither adds to nor
takes from the amount /mass/ of national wealth: that is of itself: but it is
the necessary result of measures of expence, necessary or unnecessary, avoidable
or unavoidable, beneficial or pernicious - by which in former mass a decrease in
the mass of national wealth was produced.(a)
But when and in so far as the money produced by those taxes is actually employ'd
in discharge of debt it adds to capital, and thereby to growing wealth.
( ) D'Yvarnas[?] and Bukes[?] errors.
The quantity of wealth
Similar Items
-
Title: [23 June 1801 Polit. Economy]Description: 23 June 1801 Polit. Economy Analysis D Features Encrease negative Taxes 1 30 Encrease of wealth may be considered as /distinguished into/ either positive or /and/ negative: negative consisting in the prevention of decrease. Modes of negative encrease - 1. Preservation of individual articles against unintended causes of deperition and decrease of quantity or value. Such prevention may be either total or partial: it can only be partial, in cases where decrease to a greater or less amount is indispensable, as in the case of taxes. Taxes are imposed to furnish means either for the future expenditure, or to afford compensation to those who in times past have furnished the means for expenditure which then was future: in other words for growing expences, or for discharge of debts. The amount of taxes imposed for growing expences takes from the amount of national wealth in certain ways, and adds to it in other ways more or less according as it is employ'd. It takes from the means or instruments of enjoyment+ of those on whom the taxes are imposed: enjoyment present or future immediate or more or less remote according as it would have been spent lent out or hoarded had it not been for the tax. it adds to the security of the whole in proportion as it is employ'd for the purpose of national security in the way of National defence and otherwise: it adds to the subsistence & enjoyments of a part, in proportion as it employ'd /applied/ to those purposes by those among whom it is distributed in consideration of the services by which they have respectively contributed to that end. + This division must have preceded.
-
Title: [8 Sept. 1801 Polit. Economy]Description: 8 Sept. 1801 Polit. Economy Method Finance 109 9 As to the other opinion - the ground of it is - that if the money taken in taxes to be applied in discharge of the debt, had not been so taken but had been left in the pockets of those to whom it belonged, it would have been spent by them, each in his own way, and by that expenditure an addition would have been made to the mass of national wealth. But supposing it taken from them to be applied in discharge of debt, whatever is so applied is given to them and received by them and employ'd by them - the whole of it in the shape of capital, whereas had it been left with the parties by whom it is paid in taxes it would have been spent /employ'd/ more or less of it as income is employ'd when it is said to be spent {without return or hope of return} What the proportion may be /amount to/ between the part spent /employ'd/ as income and the part employ'd as capital, and thereby employ'd in adding /making/ a growing addition to the mass of national wealth will be /has been/ considered presently. For the present it is something not to say sufficient that in one case it is only the /a/ part that is employ'd in making an addition /additions/ /goes in augmentation/ to the mass of wealth, and in the other case the whole.
-
Title: [8 Sept. 1801 Polit. Economy]Description: 8 Sept. 1801 Polit. Economy Method Finance 110 10 The support given to this opinion is given in two ways. One is by thinking nothing of what becomes of the money taken /drawn/ in taxes and made over to the Annuitants in discharge pro tanto of the national debt, but /or/ considering it as annihilated or thrown away. The other is by considering the labour paid for by the money when spent by the proprietor as it would have been had there been no /instead of being taken from him in/ taxes as being employ'd all of it in the shape of pecuniary capital, in making a correspondent addition to real capital, just as would have really been the case with the labour paid for by that money had it been made over to annuitants in discharge of so much of the debt. That a part of it would really have been so employ'd does not admitt of doubt: the error consists in supposing /considering/ what is true only of this part as /as if it were/ true of the whole. Let us observe the difference between this part and the whole. Admitting an encrease of wealth - and that a gradual and regular one the productive capital of the country taken together with the growing mass of consumed[?] & reproduced wealth continually produced by it must be considered as encreasing at compound interest The rate of interest can scarcely be taken as so high as 2 per Cent: for at two per Cent compound upon the capital taken as it stands /whatever it may amount to/ in any year, the quantity of it would be rather more than doubled in 351/2 years.+ The most sanguine estimator will not + Smarts Annuities Table 1. p.54.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1