9 Sept. 1801

Polit. Economy

Method

Finance

112

12

I take therefore two per Cent as /for/ the rate of accumulation not as the true

rate but for a rate which though considerably too high near enough to the true

rate to answer the purpose of illustration. Taking then 20 per Cent as the gross

value /ratio/ of the real income produced by that real capital to the real

capital by the employment of which it is produced, this two per cent would

constitute one tenth part of the gross income: and the part out of income added

to capital every year is one tenth part of the whole mass of which the other

nine parts are partly consumed for maintenance partly employ'd in keeping up the

real capital in statu quo that is in a condition to give birth to the same

quantity of real income in each subsequent as in each preceding year.

The whole income then of an average individual may for this purpose be

considered as divided into ten parts: of which nine parts go for /is in[?]/

present maintenance added to the expence of providing for reproduction without

decrease or encrease, and the other tenth to positive encrease.
Similar Items
  • Title: [31st Octr 180[...?] Polit Econ. Method]
    Description: 31st Octr 180[...?]

    Polit Econ. Method & Leading Features

    Ch.1. Method

    5

    61

    IV. Encreasing Land.

    not diminished by it, but increased. {In the British Empire at least it is a

    principle - that all expences in establishments, civil, military, naval - and

    occasional wars, are to be borne by the Mother Country.-} The capital employed

    in the cultivation of the Colonies by the Mother Country is so much sent out of

    it, without adequate return. Bryan Edwards, even in magnifying the utility of

    colonies, makes the rate of profit upon capital so employed but 7 per cent: the

    common calculation gives, for the profit on capital employ'd within the Mother

    Country, 15 per cent. Whatever capital is bestowed upon this employment is so

    much taken from other more lucrative ones.

    Note

    Encrease of Money.

    Income-Tax, the effect of it.

    b Note The following is an Indication of the Indirect Income Tax, resulting from

    Increase of Money.-

    In Britain, Money is about 72,000,000; income (Ao 1801) about ,216,000,000

    [72:216::1:3] Each million added to money, adds therefore three million for ever

    to pecuniary Income; and thus (setting aside the 15 per cent for ever (,150,000)

    for profit on the million if employed in the shape of capital) without addition

    to real income - if, in every year, ,2,000,000 be added to money, (plus ,300,000

    for an equivalent to the addition made as above to real wealth) in 36 Years (Ao

    1837) the nominal or pecuniary amount of a mass
  • Title: [31 Oct. 1801 + A Polit. Economy]
    Description: 31 Oct. 1801

    + A

    Polit. Economy

    Method

    Indication of the Indirect Income-Tax resulting from Encrease of Money.

    In Britain. money is about ,72,000,000, mean (Ao 1801) about ,216 000 000

    (72:216::1:3.) Each million added to money, adds therefore three million for

    ever to pecuniary income and this (setting aside the 15 per Cent for ever

    (,150,000) for profit on the million, if employ'd in the shape of capital)

    without addition to real income. If every year ,2,000,000 be added to money,

    plus ,300 000 for an equivalent to the addition made as above to real wealth, in

    36 years (Ao 1837) the nominal or pecuniary amount of a mass of real income

    equal to the amount of 1801 will be doubled i:e: become ,432,000,000: to which

    will be added ,10 800 000 for an equivalent to the intermediate additions to

    real wealth (,300,000 x 36) But the ,432 000 000 of 1837 being worth no more

    than the ,216 000 000 of 1801, each ,10 of the ,432 000 000 will be worth but

    ,50 of the ,216 000 000: that is the income of each fixed-incomist will have

    been subjected to an indirect income-tax of 50 per Cent: the King's ,900,000

    will be reduced to ,450,000. He whose pecuniary income in 1837 is double what it

    is in 1801 will in point of wealth be neither a gainer, nor loser, by the

    change. Not so in point of comfort. For, by so much as he is a gainer in wealth

    in the one way, by so much he is a loser in the other: and by the nature and

    constitution of the human frame, sum for sum, enjoyment from gain is never equal

    to suffering from loss.}
  • Title: [24 Aug. 1801 Polit. Economy]
    Description: 24 Aug. 1801

    Polit. Economy

    Method

    III. Non Agenda

    1 Money

    2

    6

    {individuals, each to double his money in the same time: neither the aggregate of

    real wealth, nor any man's share in it would thereby receive any encrease. Every

    encrease of money by paper money, produces a correspondent depretiation in the

    value of the pre-existing mass of money, and operates thereby as an indirect tax

    upon pecuniary income; a tax the benefit of which is reaped by the issuer, and

    the burthen borne by the possessors of what is called fixed income. If in

    issuing it, he employs it in a non-commercial way, i:e: pays it away as a man

    not in trade pays away the money by the spending of which he is said to spend

    his income -ploy'd in expenditure of pecuniary income, the profit is all his

    own, and it adds nothing to the mass of real wealth: if in issuing it, he

    employs it in a commercial way,: viz. as money is employ'd in the shape of

    capital, i:e: in making those purchases of things and labour of which real

    productive capital is composed, the profit in this case too is all his own, he

    adds to the national stock of present wealth (real wealth) to the amount of that

    capital, and to growing wealth to the amount of the current rate of gross profit

    upon stock or capital: if in issuing it he lends it to another who employs it

    /by whom it is employ'd/ in the shape of capital as above, the borrower gets

    profit upon stock deducting interest, and the lender interest, and the addition

    to real wealth is as before.

    In Britain the whole mass of pecuniary income may be about three times the mass

    of money in existence, of which a part only, though the greater part, by passing

    in the course of the year through a number of hands, greater by some number, but

    not a great number, than those, constitutes the above mass of pecuniary income.

    If then each added mass}