1
results found in
7435 ms
Page 1
of 1
11 Mar 1804
Polit. Economy
Ch.2. Leading Features
Finance
2
{5 The direct effect of a tax called indirect is to make a man pay for the use of
the article taxed, and to go on using it as before: an indirect effect is to
make him cease to use it, to avoid paying the tax: This indirect effect is the
same as that of a prohibitive law, prohibiting the use of the article, viz:
under a penalty equal to the amount of the tax. So far as the one effect takes
place, the other does not. Commonly they take place together, in proportions
infinitely diversifiable.
In the way of prohibition, a tax seldom falls on the article taxed, so heavily
as it appears or might be expected to do. The prohibition falls not so much upon
the article taxed, as upon whatever article each man can best spare. When a
fresh tax is imposed upon wine, a man who having been used to buy wine and
books, is fonder of wine than of books, reduces the quantity not so much of his
wine, as of his books. By a tax upon gin, many a man instead of being sobered
has been starved.
The best sort of indirect tax is that which by its effect in the character of a
prohibition, diminishes the consumption of an article the use of which is
pregnant with future misery, the dregs of the cup of present pleasure. Such
above all are the pabula of drunkenness. The fiscal is in this case crowned by a
moral, one.
The worst sort of indirect tax is that which in the character of a prohibition
lessens the use of any article, to which a man's attachment is apt not to be so
great as it were to be wished it were, considering what is the produce of it in
the shape of permanent good, over and above the evanescent pleasure. The fiscal
use is in this case clogged with an antimoral tendency. Books, especially of the
instructive kind may be mentioned as examples. But books of the least
instructive kind, music, instruments of pastime of all sorts, not to speak of
public entertainments - every thing - morality is served by every thing that
calls a man from drunkenness.}
Similar Items
-
Title: [nd [wm 1800] Ch.2. Leading Features]Description: nd [wm 1800] Ch.2. Leading Features '.5. III. Finance 28 97 2 * But if the quantity produced be merely prevented from encreasing, no such suffering is produced, and the benefit by the saving in home-paid taxes is pure. The addition which, had it not been for the tax, would have been made to the quantity of the commodity thus taxed, spread itself among other commodities of all sorts. 6. The direct effect, of the sort of tax called indirect, is to make a man pay for the use of the article taxed, and go on using it as before: an indirect effect is to make him cease to use it, to avoid paying the tax. This indirect effect is the same as that of a prohibitive law, prohibiting the use of the article, viz. under a penalty equal to the amount of the tax. So far as the one effect takes place, the other does not. Commonly they take place together, in proportions infinitely diversifiable. 7. In the way of prohibition, a tax seldom falls on the article taxed, so exclusively as might be supposed. The prohibition falls - not merely upon the article taxed, but upon whatever article each man can best spare. When a fresh tax is imposed upon Wine, a man who having been used to buy Wine and Books, is fonder of Wine than Books, reduces the quantity, not so much of his Wine, as of his Books. By a tax upon Gin, many a man, instead of being sobered, has been starved. 8. The best sort of indirect tax is that which, by its effect in the character of a prohibition, diminishes the consumption of an article, the use of which is pregnant with future misery, the dregs of the cup of present pleasure. Such, above all are the pabula of drunkenness. The fiscal, is in this case crowned by a moral, use.
-
Title: [nd [wm 1800] Ch.2. Leading Features]Description: nd [wm 1800] Ch.2. Leading Features '.5. III. Finance 29 98 3 9. The worst sort of indirect tax, is that which in the character of a prohibition lessens the use of an article to which a man's attachment is apt not to be so great as it were to be wished it were, considering what is the produce of it in the shape of permanent good, over and above the evanescent pleasure. The fiscal use is in this case clogged with an anti-moral tendency. Books, especially of the instructive kind, may be mentioned as examples. But books of the least instructive kind, music, instruments of pastime of all sorts, not to speak of public entertainments - every thing - morality is served by every thing, that calls a man off from drunkenness. 10. The mischief done in the way of prohibition by that species of direct tax which is imposed upon produce, and encreases with the quantity or value of the produce, is frequently but too real, but is apt to be exaggerated. Though my profit would be greater, if I had nobody to share it with me, my having somebody to share it with me does not make me deny myself all profit. Few men so spiteful as to hate others more than they love themselves: especially the government, which is nobody, quarrels with nobody, and protects every body. A man without a partner has the whole profit to himself; yet many men submitt to saddle themselves with partners. The government, which imposes proportional taxes on produce, is a partner who furnishes protection, though nothing else. 11. I have elsewhere spoken of the best of all financial resources, and the worst. The best, {supposing public opinion to admitt of it}, as well as the most copious, seems to be - that which gives to the public a share, in property become
-
Title: [11 Mar 1804 Polit. Economy]Description: 11 Mar 1804 Polit. Economy Finance Ch.2. Leading Features ' Finance 1 1. Where a tax is imposed upon any commodity, a proportionable discouragement - intended or not intended - is applied to the corresponding branch of profit-seeking industry, and thence a proportionable encouragement to the most immediately rival branches. In this way the branch of Political Economy which belongs to Finance, is unavoidably, though perhaps often undesignedly, entangled with the other branches. 2. To an indirect tax, each man pays no more than he pleases, and the vexation attendant on the collection of it, is confined to the makers and venders of the commodity taxed. 3. To a direct tax each man pays what the imposer of the tax pleases, and the vexation embraces every man who pays.(a) 4. A tax on imports is borne by our own people: a tax upon exports to foreign countries is borne by the inhabitants of foreign countries. Whatever imposition of this kind foreigners can be made to bear is so much gain to us. If a fresh tax is imposed upon all articles of export, and the quantity of it produced is considerably diminished by the tax, a temporary distress is thereby produced, the suffering of which may be less or greater than the suffering saved, by the saving in the amount of taxes borne by ourselves. But if the quantity produced be merely prevailed from encreasing no such suffering is produced, and the benefit by the saving in home-paid taxes is pure. The addition which would have been made to the quantity of the commodity thus taxed, spreads itself among other commodities of all sorts.} { Note (a) Among a certain set of political philosophers, may be observed a horror for indirect taxes, a passion for direct ones: a passionate desire to be coerced and vexed. The word indirect seems to have been the source of illusion here, as the word venality when applied to judicial offices. A man who buys the office at such a price as to perform the functions of it gratis, shews that it is the function that recommends it to him, not the salary. A eulogistic or dyslogistic appellative, stands in place of a reason, and works more than a reason, upon the great body - not only of mankind, but of philosophers and politicians.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1