1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
1820 Oct. 18 Spanish liberticide measures 5 Letter 2 Public Discussion 5
These Sheets Nos 5 6. 7. 8. 9. 10 were not employed in terminis in the Letter
sent.
On this part of the field of thought and action as on every other, whatsoever
law is made finds the gound covered with the mark of liberty. With the exception
of those by which coercion is taken away or modified, no can have place but
coercion is among the effects of it. But coercion is itself an evil: it
therefore ought not to be imposed without /on any other supposition than that of
its being pregnant with/ some more than equivalent good.
In the case here in question, the good if any in contemplation /that is arrived
at/ is the exclusion of some /an/ extensive political danger.
Now in the two cases in question the complexion of the danger is somewhat
different.
From an open meeting the danger in the only shape in which it can be apprehended
is that of mischief – mischief to persons or properties on the spot from some
sudden enterprize. From such a source, how extensive so ever the mischief may be
no permanent source of mischief can be apprehended.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1820. Octr 18 Spanish liberticide measures]Description: 1820. Octr 18 Spanish liberticide measures 10 Letter 2. Public Discussion 10 Where there is no ignorance there is no […?] In secresy in this case there is danger. True, but is that reason sufficient for prohibiting it? By no means. Throughout the whole field of government throughout the whole field of thought and action, look where you will you may see. Do what is proposed there is danger forbear doing it there is still danger. Do any thing or do nothing to avoid danger is impossible. The uncertain mischief with which the supposed danger is pregnant is it greater in value than the certain mischief of the proposed remedy? behold in this a question which should not ever be out of mind. Looking to the United States, where you may meet and form political schemes and be all the while as secret as you please, I see all this supposed danger at its height for forty years and not a grain of mischief from it in all that time: if forty years if this experience be not enough for you, look at any one of the original thirteen States or of the […?] two and twenty states, and see whether from the very birth of them the case has not been every where the same. True it is that if upon this part of the field of thought and action I were to feel myself under the weight of introducing regulation coercion and prohibition, this circumstance of secresy would be the first subject I should be for applying them.
-
Title: [1820. Octr 18 Spanish liberticide measures]Description: 1820. Octr 18 Spanish liberticide measures 11 Letter 2. Public Discussion 11 Mr Gorelli makes no distinction. He will neither have excitation nor instruction: wherever he sees free discussion there he sees an enemy. Had the provision /his means of safety/ been temporary, some excuse might have made of it: but so far as words go it is everlasting. In one single town A danger whatever may have been amount of it had place for a few days: no actual mischief, as far I can understand, was the result of it. If so The mischief was after all but ideal. For remedy against a danger thus blown over – for this it is that Mr Goreli organizes a danger designed to last as long as the Constitution lasts, and designed for I can not see what less is designed to destroy it. A guard – a military guard – under the command of the President of the Cortes for the time being – had this been his means of safety – necessary or not necessary – I should have seen no danger in it. On the particular occasion in question, one regiment, the regiment of | | offered (I see it said) its services. Let these services be accepted and as above perpetual. I have no fear from them. Neither the Nation /people/, nor the King with all the remaining /other/ regiments, regulars and militia likewise, could have much to fear from this one regiment under such command, nor from many such regiments put together. Here then would be certain and everlasting force, provided against imagined and apprehended force, and that but contingent and should it have place, but momentary. Would not be sufficient.
-
Title: [1820 Oct. 18 Spanish liberticide measures]Description: 1820 Oct. 18 Spanish liberticide measures 6 Letter 2. Public Discussion 6 From select meetings under a Constitution such as the Spanish no just ground for the apprehending danger can have place, unless on the supposition for the production of the corresponding mischief secresy be /is/ employed. Under the veil of secresy mischief may in great variety be produced mischief the production of which by open meetings would be hopeless. A plan of separate assassination might be organized: so likewise a plan of military operations to any extent, by direction suddenly given to a body already prepared and disposed and equipped for the purpose. In this case exclude secresy you exclude danger. Why? because secresy being excluded no mischievous enterprize can be formed but those to whom it would be mischievous have the warning of it have the information of it, /the intended evil/ and means thereby given to them of taking measures for their defence /the prevention of it/. {As the danger i.e. the more or less probable mischief is in the two cases different so is the good. In the case of the open /an open/ meeting, the principal shape in which it has place is that of excitation /its chief use is excitation: in the case of a select meeting, instruction. In the case of the select meeting, the principal shape in which it has place is instruction. mutual instruction. Of an open meeting the chief use is excitation: of a select meeting, instruction.}
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1