1
results found in
34 ms
Page 1
of 1
1822 Nov. 5 Tripoli. Securities against Misrule 3o Preliminary Explanations 2.
Sanctionment
In the countries in question if I understand the matter right, none of these
memorials have been collected, which in England over so large a portion of the
field of thought and action occupy /stand/ the place of law. I mean that sort of
matter which consists /is composed/ of statements of cases by which judicial
decision has been called for - the particular decision pronounced in each case,
and the general positions which have been brought forward by the Judge in
support and justification of his particular decision, such general positions
which /as/ in the way of inference have been deduced from it by writers /mere
volunteer dissertators/ not invested with any such authority as that of a Judge.
Case 2. The standard of reference referred to in Judicial decisions, composed -
not of inferences /drawn not/ from former decisions, but from an original
standard, composed in a time of remote antiquity /of antient date/.
In the country in question not of any such matter the standard of reference is
it seems of this second sort composed: not of any such matter but of the
following. There stands the Coran, the work of Mahomet the universally
acknowledged standard of opinion and practice in all matters of religion as well
as law. But for a great portion of those particular cases which the occurrences
of life are continually giving birth in this book the matter being for the most
part of a nature extremely general is not susceptible of an application
particular enough to serve as an adequately determinate guide. Influenced by
this observation, different persons without concert with each other have at
various times set themselves to work to fill up the vacuities, all of them
agreing in the homage paid to the general positions discoverable in the sacred
text, but differing from one another in no inconsiderable degree in respect of
the inferences drawn from them - the particular practice of which as being
contained under them /included within them/ application has been made. With
reference to the sacred text, these works of inferior authority stand in the
relation of Commentaries.
Similar Items
-
Title: [1822 Nov. 5 Tripoli. Securities against Misrule]Description: 1822 Nov. 5 Tripoli. Securities against Misrule. 3o Preliminary Explanations ?. Remedy Publicity 2. Operations 1. Ordinances 2. Sanctionment Thus far, /now as to Enactment/ Ordinances, such as the nature of the case requires /appropriate and adequate to the exigency/ - have been supposed to be already in existence. If so it be well. But suppose the state of things to be in the contrary case? what is then to be done Case 1. In relation to the matter in question no Ordinance of the above description in existence. But on the occasion of judicial decisions, the standard of reference composed of anterior decisions, or inferences deduced from them. In the European Governments, with the exception of the few instances if any in which /small extent to which in general/ Codification has had place such is the state of the rule of action, under the dominion /where the rule of action is in the state/ of what is called Common Law or Unwritten law. On most parts of the field of law a quantity of matter has been written - written by men not invested nor so much as pretending to be invested with the power of legislation /legislative authority/: and out of this huge and shapeless mass of writing the Judge on each occasion makes choice of such portion /portions/ as appear to him best adapted to his purpose: to the purpose which is most agreable to him, whatever it may happen to be. In this state of things Singularly unfortunate, if not unskilful must that Judge be who out of so rich a [...?], fails on any occasion to find that which is most agreable to his wishes whatsoever they may happen to be: to his wishes, guided as they can not but be by what at the moment he looks upon as being his interest.
-
Title: [1822 Nov. 9 Tripoli. Securities against Misrule]Description: 1822 Nov. 9 Tripoli. Securities against Misrule 3o Preliminary Explanations 2. Sanctionment Throughout the dominion of the Coran, four of these Commentaries have obtained the preeminence over all the others. Such is the degree of that preeminence as to have given rise as it were to two classes of Commentaries Commentaries of the first order and Commentaries of the second order - those of the second order being not exclusively at least Commentaries on the sacred text but Commentaries upon those of the first order: Commentaries on Commentaries. Commentators of the first order four, as above: Commentaries of the second order not so few as seven hundred. Though clear of confusion from that source of which indication has been given as above in the case of the European and especially the English Books of Reports and Treatises deduced from them, the Eastern system fails not however to labour under very obvious and such as can not but be very grievous inconveniences /imperfections/. In the first place, no one of them having in a direct way taken for its object of pursuit the greatest happiness of the greatest number none can unless by accident have made any clearly defined provision for it in the course[?] of such arrangements of detail as are to be found deducible from it. In the next place in opening out the thread of inferences they have all of them taken on various occasions courses more or less different From all these diversities to an extent more or less considerable two evil consequences can not but have existed /taken place/. So uncertain /indeterminate/ in this or that case is the bearing of some or all of these previous Commentaries upon that case, that the Judge be his probity ever so pure finds more or less difficulty in determining in what manner he shall make application of them to the case.
-
Title: [13 July 1804 Procedure & Evidence]Description: 13 July 1804 Procedure & Evidence Introd. Ch 8. Collateral Incidental 3. Delay '.1. Sources I The operations having respect to the question of law may be thus enumerated - 1. Where the article of law in question is an article of statutory law, and no more articles than one are considered as bearing upon it /the subject/ reference to the terms of that one article - and discussions between party and party relative to the import of it. 2. Where divers articles of statutory law are considered as bearing upon the subject, and the question turns upon the disposition /sense/ to be inferred /extracted/ from a comparison of them altogether, reference to such articles respectively, and discussions relative to the import as before 3. When the article of law in question is a supposed article of jurisprudential law, reference to the several sorts of authorities considered as sources of argument in that sort of law: viz: /such as/ decisions on[?] contested cases, memorials of judicial practice in uncontested cases or on points uncontested - general inferences drawn from such particular decisions in treatises ancient or modern - and so on. reference to these several authorities, as cited on both sides - and discussions relative to the degree of weight to be respectively ascribed to them, and the opposite inferences capable of being drawn from them 4. Where one or more articles of statutory law are considered as bearing upon the point, and these articles, one or more of them already given occasion to /been the subject of/ decisions grounded on them, in virtue of which decisions a correspondent portion of jurisprudential law is also considered as bearing upon the same point, hence comes a fourth sort of operation sort of composite operation /set of operation/ compounded of the first and third, or of the second and third of the those beforementioned operations.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1