1823 Jan. 21 Trip. H. to Q.A. Unobjectionable by other powers

Were you /If, without explanation you were/ to take possession of the port of

Tripoli, or any other port or station in North Africa, though in reality the

possession were not designed to be otherwise than temporary and short©lived,

other European powers, England more particularly, might perhaps take umbrage.

Supposing even that in no other shape injury to their interests were

apprehended, still what they would naturally apprehend is injury, in some shape

or other to their trade, such for example as the admission of vessels from your

States upon terms more favorable /advantageous/ that were granted to other

States To obviate any such apprehension, I would therefore submit to you whether

there might not be a use in the event of your sending us any such assistance, to

provide your Agents with a Declaration /State paper/ having for its object the

shutting the door against every such apprehension: declaring that you will not

keep possession to your one use of any portion of territory on the North African

Coast, nor [...?] or accept any accommodation /but such/ in which all other

nations shall not enjoy an equal share.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1823. Jan¼y 28 Trip. H. to Q.A. ?.7. Inducements]
    Description: 1823. Jan¼y 28 Trip. H. to Q.A. ?.7. Inducements to U.S

    2. In the next place comes the having a port in the Mediterranean for refuge:

    refuge against bad weather and naval accidents. This convenience has long been

    among the universally known objects of your desires and as yet fruitless

    endeavours Very lately you have been trying to obtain it from Spain: so at least

    I have heard from more than one authentic source. Even from Tripoli, so long ago

    as the year 1804 or thereabouts, you took measures, and those strong ones, for

    obtaining it. What you then got, was found not to answer the purpose, and you

    abandoned it. Neither I have heard it said would the port of Tripoli itself. If

    not, might not a spot that would on some other part of the Coast? Is the

    negative sufficiently ascertained by any such surveys as you have made? If so,

    might not the coast of Tunis, or that of Algiers? In these cases it is true

    after the regeneration of Tripoli, you would have to wait for that of those two

    States respectively.

    Supposing you to succeed in any negotiation with Spain, there would be in the

    first place the expence of purchase, in the next place the whole expence of

    construction: and this, over and above the expence of such a fleet as you might

    think fit to send to take possession. In our case, the mere expence of such a

    fleet as that might perhaps suffice. If so, then the expence of purchase would

    be the whole of it saved in the article of construction, expence, to a greater

    or less amount might not improbably be saved by such contribution as for the

    common benefit it might be in our power as well as inclination to afford.
  • Title: [1823 Jan¼y 21 Trip. H. to Q.A. Advantages]
    Description: 1823 Jan¼y 21 Trip. H. to Q.A. Advantages to other Nations

    Inducements to U.S. Think of the benefit which you will thus confer on so many

    other nations: think of the confidence which the proposed unambitious use of

    your power will secure to you at their hands: think of the obligation which you

    will have conferred on them: think of the sentiments of affection and respect

    with which the receivers of such a benefit and on such terms would scarce have

    it in their power were it even in their inclination © to regard the authors:

    think of the glory © the true glory which throughout all ages /to the end of

    time/ it would entail upon Your Union in general, and in particular on the

    functionaries to whom in a more especial manner the civilized world /the human

    race/ /mankind/ would be indebted for this blessing /for the proposed [...?]/

    for so signal a blessing.

    By the Spanish nation in a preeminent /more particular/ degree the common

    /universal/ benefit would be enjoyed. For their possessions in North Africa, if

    thought worth keeping they would derive from the new order of things encrease

    /the perfection/ of security, with diminution of expence. Supposing as above

    that in /into/ the other ports admission were secured by you to all nations upon

    the same equal terms, this same plan of liberality might find on their parts no

    unwillingness /them on their parts not unwilling/ to embrace it.
  • Title: [1823 Jan¼y 28 Trip. H. to Q.A ?.7. U.S. inducements]
    Description: 1823 Jan¼y 28 Trip. H. to Q.A ?.7. U.S. inducements

    1. In the first place comes ”Securityes against North African Piracy•. From no

    other source could any thing like a perpetual and entire an entire, or in

    perpetuity so much as a partial security for you against this plague be derived

    to you. To day the States in question leave you all of them unmolested, but

    tomorrow the molestation may by any or all of them be renewed. To day, you have

    treaties with them: but tomorrow those treaties may, any or all of them, be

    formally broken off or violated. Under governments such as ours, in a state of

    society and manners such as ours, the whole wisdom of years may at any time be

    set at nought, by the caprice or ungrounded passion of the moment passion Sir

    grounded on false information © or even destitute of all ground. Upon this topic

    I see no need of enlarging. Though on your minds, in your situation, the idea of

    this irritability with its consequences can not be so strongly impressed by

    observation from a distance as on ours it is by sad and continual experience, it

    is not without some assurance that I expect to find it sufficiently so for the

    purpose.

    True it is that on your part no such security can be compleat unless and untill

    the plan has been accomplished in regard to all the States in question: more

    particularly in regard to ”Algiers• that being beyond comparison the most

    formidable. But the plan, you see, embraces them all, and every thing must have

    its beginning. Neither were it to stop at Tripoli, would a perpetual security

    from the hostility of that State be at all times a matter of indifference to

    you. At any rate it was not in the year 1804