1
results found in
19 ms
Page 1
of 1
1821 Novr 23 Codification Proposal Abridgment '.9. Draughtsman Gratuitous
I. On the part of the workman, inaptitude in the shape in which it stands
opposed to appropriate moral aptitude.
1. Be they who they may, the patron or patrons will be exposed to the influence,
not to say subject to the dominion, of sinister interests and prejudices. This
has been shewn in Section the fifth. The dependent or protegé (for in English
though we have the thing we have not the name) will be under the dominion of
those same interests and prejudices, and to these the draught will endeavour to
give effect, with the addition of any such of his own as he thinks he can
venture to steal in.
II. On the part of the workman, inaptitude not only in the above shape, but in
all shapes: in those in which it stands opposed to the two other elements of
appropriate aptitude, namely appropriate intellectual aptitude, and appropriate
active talent.
The pay is a determinate and tangible object: an object to the value of which
every eye is sensible: those of the patron or patrons, be they who they may,
among the rest. In comparison of this - in competition with this - the goodness
of the service, where it is in any degree an object will, generally speaking, be
at best but a secondary one. The appointment, or the vote towards the
appointment, will accordingly be given - not to the individual who is regarded
as being likely to render the best service, if it be before the work is done, as
having rendered it if it be after the work is done, - but to the individual,
whom, whether on his the patrons own account, or on the account of some
connection of his, it will be most agreable to him to see thus served.
Similar Items
-
Title: [[036-088v] 1821. Nov r. 28.]Description: [036-088v] 1821. Nov r. 28. Codification Proposal '.9. Draughtsman Gratuitous. I. On the part of the workmen, inaptitude in the shape in which it stands opposed to appropriate moral aptitude. 1. Be they who they may, the patron or patrons will be exposed to the influence, not to say subject to the dominion, of sinister interests and prejudices. This has been shown in Section the fifth. The dependent or protigo (for in English though we have the thing, we have not the name) will be under the dominion of these same interests and prejudices, and to these the draught will endeavour to give effect, with the addition of any such of his own as he thinks he can venture to steal in. II. On the part of the workman, inaptitude not only in the above shape, but in all shapes: in those in which it stands opposed to the two other elements of appropriate aptitude, namely appropriate intellectual aptitude and appropriate active talent. The pay is a determinate and tangible object: an object to the value of which every eye is sensible: those of the patron or patrons, be they who they may, among the rest. In comparison of this - in competition with this - the goodness of the service, where it is in any degree an object, will generally speaking be at best a secondary one. The appointment, or the vote towards the appointment, will accordingly be given - not to the individual who is regarded as being likely to render the best service, if it be before the work is done, or as having rendered it, if it be after the work is done - but to the individual, whom, whether on his the patron's own account, or on the account of some connection of his, it will be most agreeable to him to see thus served. III. On the part of the work, on the one hand comparative inaptitude through precipitation, or on the other hand needless and useless delay up to final non-execution, according to the mode in which the pay is connected with the looked-for service. Apply the pay in one way, the work suffers for want of time to do it well in: apply the pay in another way, the work lingers, and for a time more or less considerable, the benefit of it is lost: apply it again in another way, the pay is continually received, and the work never executed. 1. The work suffers for want of time to execute it in - if, a time being fixed, after which no draught shall be received, the interval allowed is not sufficient for giving to the work that degree
-
Title: [1821 Nov. 8 Codification Offer Abridgmt]Description: 1821 Nov. 8 Codification Offer Abridgmt '.9. Draughtsman gratuitous 1. Plans for obtaining proposed Codes by factitious reward, what, and why ineligible. By the application, factitious reward being in this case to be administered, the case is thereby rendered a case of patronage: in a state of dependence, present or recently past the persons looking for, or in possession of, the reward; patron or patrons the person or persons to whose nomination or influence the person or persons, in possession or expectancy of the appointment with the reward attached, are or look to be indebted for it. Every plan of appointment in which such patronage has place will be seen to be ineligible. The following are the causes by which this ineligibility will be seen to be produced. 1. The sinister interests and prejudices to the action of which the patron or patrons in their situation stand exposed, have in '.5. been already brought to view: to the action of these same causes of bad workmanship the dependant stands necessarily exposed, together with any others which may happen to have application in his own particular instance. 2. By the corruptive influence of patronage, the probability of appropriate aptitude on the part of the workman, and thence on the part of the work, can not but be greatly diminished. 3. Under the influence of this plan, the work in question will, according to the mode of payment employed, be in all probability, if produced at all, either inordinately delayed, or through precipitation deprived of more or less of the aptitude which might otherwise have belonged to it. 4. By this mode of remuneration, the number of the works, which the legislature might otherwise have had to choose out of, will unavoidably be narrowed. 5. To the evils of close workmanship as above, will thus necessarily be added the encrease given in the present instance to the general evil of close patronage, with its corruptive influence. Such are the positions. Here follow the proofs. 1. That by the sinister interests in question the aptitude of the work in so far as depends upon appropriate moral aptitude on the part of the workman can not in this case fail of being impaired has been shewn already, as above.
-
Title: [1821. Novr. 10. Codification Offer]Description: 1821. Novr. 10. Codification Offer Abridgmt '9. Draughtsman gratuitous be sufficiently manifest that, in the case in question, competition would have for its object - for its principal object at least - not the service but the reward - that, in the bestowing of the appointment, or of their vote and influence towards it, the patrons would have more regard, each of them, to his own good wishes in favour of his protegé, than to the goodness of the service. Of his own good wishes, neither perfect understanding nor perfect care would be in any danger of failing: not quite so sure can be - either the goodness of his judgment respecting a man's aptitude for the service, or his regard for that same service. The factitious reward being thus announced, announcement of the natural reward, as above described, would or would not be added to it: if not, the factitious reward would alone be thought of : if yes, then, as will be seen presently, then would the factitious reward be needless; and being, as above, pernicious, worse than useless.
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1