1821 Novr 23 Codification Proposal Abridgment '.9. Draughtsman Gratuitous

I. On the part of the workman, inaptitude in the shape in which it stands

opposed to appropriate moral aptitude.

1. Be they who they may, the patron or patrons will be exposed to the influence,

not to say subject to the dominion, of sinister interests and prejudices. This

has been shewn in Section the fifth. The dependent or protegé (for in English

though we have the thing we have not the name) will be under the dominion of

those same interests and prejudices, and to these the draught will endeavour to

give effect, with the addition of any such of his own as he thinks he can

venture to steal in.

II. On the part of the workman, inaptitude not only in the above shape, but in

all shapes: in those in which it stands opposed to the two other elements of

appropriate aptitude, namely appropriate intellectual aptitude, and appropriate

active talent.

The pay is a determinate and tangible object: an object to the value of which

every eye is sensible: those of the patron or patrons, be they who they may,

among the rest. In comparison of this - in competition with this - the goodness

of the service, where it is in any degree an object will, generally speaking, be

at best but a secondary one. The appointment, or the vote towards the

appointment, will accordingly be given - not to the individual who is regarded

as being likely to render the best service, if it be before the work is done, as

having rendered it if it be after the work is done, - but to the individual,

whom, whether on his the patrons own account, or on the account of some

connection of his, it will be most agreable to him to see thus served.
Similar Items
  • Title: [[036-088v] 1821. Nov r. 28.]
    Description: [036-088v]

    1821. Nov r. 28.

    Codification Proposal

    '.9. Draughtsman Gratuitous.

    I. On the part of the workmen, inaptitude in the shape in which it stands opposed to appropriate moral aptitude.

    1. Be they who they may, the patron or patrons will be exposed to the influence, not to say subject to the dominion, of sinister interests and prejudices. This has been shown in Section the fifth. The dependent or protigo (for in English though we have the thing, we have not the name) will be under the dominion of these same interests and prejudices, and to these the draught will endeavour to give effect, with the addition of any such of his own as he thinks he can venture to steal in.

    II. On the part of the workman, inaptitude not only in the above shape, but in all shapes: in those in which it stands opposed to the two other elements of appropriate aptitude, namely appropriate intellectual aptitude and appropriate active talent.

    The pay is a determinate and tangible object: an object to the value of which every eye is sensible: those of the patron or patrons, be they who they may, among the rest. In comparison of this - in competition with this - the goodness of the service, where it is in any degree an object, will generally speaking be at best a secondary one. The appointment, or the vote towards the appointment, will accordingly be given - not to the individual who is regarded as being likely to render the best service, if it be before the work is done, or as having rendered it, if it be after the work is done - but to the individual, whom, whether on his the patron's own account, or on the account of some connection of his, it will be most agreeable to him to see thus served.

    III. On the part of the work, on the one hand comparative inaptitude through precipitation, or on the other hand needless and useless delay up to final non-execution, according to the mode in which the pay is connected with the looked-for service.

    Apply the pay in one way, the work suffers for want of time to do it well in: apply the pay in another way, the work lingers, and for a time more or less considerable, the benefit of it is lost: apply it again in another way, the pay is continually received, and the work never executed.

    1. The work suffers for want of time to execute it in - if, a time being fixed, after which no draught shall be received, the interval allowed is not sufficient for giving to the work that

    degree
  • Title: [1821 Nov. 8 Codification Offer Abridgmt]
    Description: 1821 Nov. 8 Codification Offer Abridgmt '.9. Draughtsman gratuitous

    1. Plans for obtaining proposed Codes by factitious reward, what, and why

    ineligible.

    By the application, factitious reward being in this case to be administered, the

    case is thereby rendered a case of patronage: in a state of dependence, present

    or recently past the persons looking for, or in possession of, the reward;

    patron or patrons the person or persons to whose nomination or influence the

    person or persons, in possession or expectancy of the appointment with the

    reward attached, are or look to be indebted for it.

    Every plan of appointment in which such patronage has place will be seen to be

    ineligible. The following are the causes by which this ineligibility will be

    seen to be produced.

    1. The sinister interests and prejudices to the action of which the patron or

    patrons in their situation stand exposed, have in '.5. been already brought to

    view: to the action of these same causes of bad workmanship the dependant stands

    necessarily exposed, together with any others which may happen to have

    application in his own particular instance.

    2. By the corruptive influence of patronage, the probability of appropriate

    aptitude on the part of the workman, and thence on the part of the work, can not

    but be greatly diminished.

    3. Under the influence of this plan, the work in question will, according to the

    mode of payment employed, be in all probability, if produced at all, either

    inordinately delayed, or through precipitation deprived of more or less of the

    aptitude which might otherwise have belonged to it.

    4. By this mode of remuneration, the number of the works, which the legislature

    might otherwise have had to choose out of, will unavoidably be narrowed.

    5. To the evils of close workmanship as above, will thus necessarily be added

    the encrease given in the present instance to the general evil of close

    patronage, with its corruptive influence.

    Such are the positions. Here follow the proofs.

    1. That by the sinister interests in question the aptitude of the work in so far

    as depends upon appropriate moral aptitude on the part of the workman can not in

    this case fail of being impaired has been shewn already, as above.
  • Title: [1821. Novr. 10. Codification Offer]
    Description: 1821. Novr. 10.

    Codification Offer

    Abridgmt

    '9. Draughtsman gratuitous

    be sufficiently manifest that, in the case in question, competition would have for its object - for its principal object at least - not the service but the reward - that, in the bestowing of the appointment, or of their vote and influence towards it, the patrons would have more regard, each of them, to his own good wishes in favour of his protegé, than to the goodness of the service. Of his own good wishes, neither perfect understanding nor perfect care would be in any danger of failing: not quite so sure can be - either the goodness of his judgment respecting a man's aptitude for the service, or his regard for that same service.

    The factitious reward being thus announced, announcement of the natural reward,

    as above described, would or would not be added to it: if not, the factitious

    reward would alone be thought of : if yes, then, as will be seen presently, then

    would the factitious reward be needless; and being, as above, pernicious, worse

    than useless.