1821 Aug. 24. Codification Offer '.5. Draughtsman single

Remains, as the only form of government under which the subject many are not, in

the breasts of the ruling few, objects of dissocial affection in any shape -

Representative Democracy: in particular, that which, for these forty years, has

stood exhibited in the Anglo-American United States: original number, thirteen:

now, August 1821, encreased to twenty three. Here instead of contempt and hatred

on one side (not to speak of the other) may be seen by every eye that can endure

the sight, respect and love on both sides. Of this felicity, the cause, is -

that, while the whole of the operative power of the government is in the hands

of a comparatively small number, the whole of the constitutive power, with

reference to that same operative power, is in the hands of the many: those, by

whom the several branches of the operative power are exercised, being, with or

without immediate agency, not only appointed, but with certainty and promptitude

removable, by those by whom the above-mentioned constitutive power is exercised:

for it is of such power of appointment and removal that that same constitutive

power is composed.

Thus it is that as, in an absolute Monarchy, on the part of the rulers, that

inaptitude, which is the opposite of appropriate moral aptitude is consummate,

so, in a representative democracy, framed on the principle of virtually

universal suffrage, appropriate moral aptitude itself is consummate. Under a

limited Monarchy, according to the extent of the limitations, and the situation

of the hands by which they are applied, the degree of moral inaptitude on the

part of the sub-rulers may admitt of some depression: namely in consequence of

any influence which the subject many may chance to have, in the choice and in

the conduct of those same sub-rulers: but, at the very best, in so far as, in

the /their/ eyes competition has place, the happiness of the subject many will

still with certainty and constancy, be sacrificed to the happiness of those same

sub-rulers.
Similar Items
  • Title: [1821 Aug. 23 Codification Offer]
    Description: 1821 Aug. 23

    Codification Offer

    '.9. Draughtsman single

    What limitations have place are applied by the hands of a sub-ruling few who

    thereby are admitted into a proportionable share of the power of government: the

    exercise of which has of course their own greatest happiness for its sole object

    If, in what is above as applied to an absolute Monarchy, there be any truth, no

    less is there if applied to a limited Monarchy: in an absolute monarchy the sole

    actual end of government is the greatest happiness of the ruling one: in a

    limited Monarchy the sole end of government is the greatest happiness of the

    ruling one in conjunction with that of the sub-ruling few namely those few, by

    whom, and consequently for the sake of whose happiness the application of the

    limitations has been and continues to be made. Such at any rate is the case in

    every limited Monarchy as yet fully established in particular in the English:

    which is as much as to say in that Monarchy in which the limitations, intended

    for the benefit of the sub-ruling few, have hitherto, in a higher degree than in

    any other Monarchy been in their consequences conducive to the greatest

    happiness of the greatest number.

    Note concluded from another page

    Remains, as the only form of government under which the subject many are not, in

    the breasts of the ruling few, objects of dissocial affection in any shape - are

    not objects either of hatred - nor contempt, but on the contrary of love and

    respect, Representative Democracy: in particular that which for these forty

    years has stood established in the Anglo-American United States: original number

    thirteen: now August 1821 encreased to twenty three. Of this felicity the cause

    is - that while the whole of the operative power of the government is in the

    hands of a comparatively small number, the whole of the constitutive power with

    reference to that same operative power is in the hands of many: those by whom

    the several branches of the operative power are exercised being, with or without

    intermediate agency, not only appointed, but with certainty and promptitude

    removable by those by whom the abovementioned constitutive power is exercised:

    for it is of such power of appointment and removal that that same constitutive

    power is composed. Thus it is that as, in an absolute Monarchy, on the part of

    the rulers that inaptitude which is the opposite of appropriate moral aptitude

    is consummate, so in a representative democracy, framed on the principle of

    virtually universal suffrage, appropriate moral aptitude itself is consummate.

    Under a limited Monarchy, according to the extent of the limitations and the

    situation of the hand by which they are applied, the degree of moral inaptitude

    may admitt of some depression: but at the very best in so far as in the case of

    the rulers competition has place, the happiness of the subject many will still

    with certainty and constancy be sacrificed to that of the ruling one in

    conjunction with that of the sub-ruling few.
  • Title: [[lxxxiv. 13] 1821 Decr. 4 Codification]
    Description: [lxxxiv. 13]

    1821 Decr. 4

    Codification Proposal

    penult

    ?.5. Draughtsman Single

    /Appendix?/

    The influence of these several causes of inaptitude in diminution of the aggregate of appropriate aptitude on the part of the [...?], /author of the sort of draught in question,/ will be more or less different according to the situation occupied by him with reference to the power [?] of government.: He may invested with power or not: If he be not, his situation is that of a subordinate servile [?], acting under the direction and in subjection to the will of the person or persons on whose ultimate pleasure /ordainment [?]/ the maker of the draught will depend. If he be /his situation be that of one/ invested with power, the event in question being the result of the exercise of sovereign power, his power and thence his situation in respect of power will be different according as the government is that of a Monarchy, or that of a Commonwealth

    If it be a Monarchy his situation may be that of the Monarch © the ruling one, or that of a Member of the subordinately ruling few.

    If it be a Commonwealth his situation will be that of a Member of the supremely ruling few

    If the Commonwealth be a Representative Democracy, the supreme power is /stands/ [...?] divided into two branches: the ”operative• and the ”constitutive•; the constitutive is such with reference to those by whom the supreme operative power is possessed and exercised: it consists in the placing and displacing or replacing those by whom that same supremely operative power is possessed and exercised: if the Commonwealth be a pure Aristocracy, these two branches of supreme power are possessed and exercised by the same hands.
  • Title: [1821. April 27. First Lines]
    Description: 1821. April 27.

    First Lines

    Constitutional

    In a Representative Democracy, the exercise of this designative power is perfrmed by human judgment: under a Monarchy it is performed by fortune or providence. The cause being the same, and that cause out of the reach of our knowledge, each man may, on each particular occasion, do as he is accustomed to do, employ that one of the two which, on that occasion, is regarded by him as best suited to his purpose. Under the exercise made of this power by fortune, the supremem operative power finds itself, at the death of the last possessor, in the hands of the only child, or, in case of children more than one living at that moment, of the first born of the children of a certain woman: the power of removal is, under the direction of fortune or providence, or by accident, human judgment exercised by death.

    In so far as the power of appointment is thus exercised by fortune or providence, no degree of relative inaptitude short of universally manifest and compleat insanity of mind has the effect of preventing the exercise of the operative power from finding itself lodged in the hands thus designated and appointed: no degree of inaptitude short of that produced by insanity, as above, takes the power of removal out of the hands of death

    The