1
results found in
21 ms
Page 1
of 1
27 May 1808 8
- The case is - that under in this state of things it is in the power of any single individual in the station of Juryman to command a verdict, and there to the conviction of all harbour a false one, thus by the voluntary perjury of one, forcing producing the involuntary perjury eleven others to perjure themselves.
How then is a receipt, nor that one unobvious one
by which any man party who either already proffesses or can continue manages so as to gain a single individual to seek a proper a single individual out of twelve jurymen, may command the verdict. To its other properties this inessential function of the institution adds therefore that of being an incentive encouragement to corruption, and that of the most powerful kind.
A story which current upon this occasion, and the design of which when related has commonly been that of recommending these factors to public favor in the character of a security to the innocent Englishmen's lives, an institution arrangement of the most nation friendly and conducive to the ends of justice, may in this reason true or false, serve the purpose of illustration.
A man is indicted for murder. He is innocent, but by a regular concurrence of circumstances, the evidence, being chiefly of the circumstantial kind bears is known to bear strong against him. By the force influence of the known circumstances The real author of the death is screened from . This concurrence tortures him. One death howsoever produced, sat heavy on it: and now the death of another person, altogether innocent, and with whom he himself had had no quarrel, is about to be added to the load. What (says he to himself) shall I do to save him? - I have hit upon it. &
Similar Items
-
Title: [27 May 1808 4 Dark as are the colours]Description: 27 May 1808 4 Dark as are the colours in which happily inessential this part of the institution presents itself to a general and distant glance, on a closer inspection they will not be found to brighten: on a nearer view If the effect of the compulsion are confined to the suppression of the opinion of the minority, the majority opinion of the constituting the decision as it would do of course without the compulsion, here would be the torture, here would be the lying here would be the perjury, all of these enormities them perfectly useless, but here would not be the false verdict with the false judgment pronounced in consequence. But though it probably is frequently in many instances cases it is probably thus unless and not so probably in most instances, there can be no apearance of its being so in any. If in one point of view the most probable case is that the opinion thus declared to be the opinion of all is conformable to the opinion of the majority, greater in another point of view the most probably case is that it is opposite the opinion of the smaller number. Suppose the produced before the Justice begins to speak, the probability is that the opinion declared is the opinion of the majority: because under these circumstances a margin of this or of any other kind is sooner produced on the part of a smaller than on the part of a larger greater number. But suppose the decision verdict to have waited till the tribune has had time to operate: now here the probability is on the other side: for when torture is to be undergone, and on the part of the greater number of the patriots the resolution to undergo it produced by the finest motives, it is easier to find a smaller than to find a greater number. possessed of this and degree of fortitude.
-
Title: [27 May 1808 I will get myself put]Description: 27 May 1808 I will get myself put upon the Jury — I will go with my comrades into the withdrawing chamber, and then be the evidence what it will may, they shall stay, till I have brought men to concurr with me in a verdict of not guilty. - and so says the story he died: the particulars being afterwards confessed by him on his death-bed. Supposing this true, what does it prove? - that when a man is determined upon it, it is in his power to make his way into the Jury-box: and when he is there, that it is in the power of any man who in any shape is actuated by a strong interest to command the of eleven men who by the are without interest, needs no proof. In this state of things, verdicts contrary to the clearest evidence neither naturally can be nor actually are infrequent are not infrequent: indeed so far are they from being so, that when they do occurr, no mention is produced by them. How should it be? The very object of the arraignment is to produce perjury: in the effect what is there that should call In cases not penal the mischief is not altogether without remedy. For when purse and perseverance suffice to demand it, new trial is sometimes granted. But in penalcases and especially in capital new trial is either altogether unobtainable, unexampled prohibited by practice or extremely rare. False ju verdict To the prejudice of the defendants side false verdict might find a remedy, is capable of finding a cure or at least a palliative in pardon: but to the prejudice of the plaintiff's side, that is to the prejudice of public security, violent and false false judgment are altogether without remedy.
-
Title: [31 Aug 1804. Collectania Juridicae]Description: 31 Aug 1804. Collectania Juridicae :Blackstones — H K Neither can burglary be committed in a tent or booth erected in a market or fair; tho' the owner may lodge therein: for the law regards thus highly nothing but permanent edifices.... & it is the folly of the owner to lodge in so fragile a tenement: but his lodging there no more makes it burglary to break it open than it wo d be to uncover a titled waggon in the same circumstances. IV 226 If a person leaves his doors or windows open, it is his own folly & negligence; & if a man enters therein it is no burglary: yet, if he afterwards unlocks an inner or chamber door it is so. IV 226. Of things... that adhere to the freehold, as corn, grass, trees, & the like, or lead upon a house, no larceny could be committed by the rules of the common law; but the severance of them was, & in many things is still, merely a trespass. IV 232. But if the thief severs them [things that a dhere to the freehold] at one time, whereby the trespass is completed, & they are converted into personal chattels, in the constructive possession of him in whose soil they are left or laid; & comes again at another time, when they are so turned into personally, & takes them away; it is larceny: & so it is, if the owner or any one else has revered them. IV 233. Stealing one out of mines is... no larceny, upon the same principle of adherence to the freehold; with an exception only to mines of black lead, the stealing one out of which is felony without benefit of clergy. IV 234 The stealing of writings relating to a real estate is no felony, but a trespass: because they concern the land, or ... savour of the realty, & are considered as part of it by law. IV 234 It is true , that th merc y of juries will often make them strain a point, & bring in larceny to be under the value of t we lvepence when it is really of much greater value: but this is a kind of pious per jury. IV 239 The offence of p rivately stealing from a man's person .... without his knowledge, was debarred of th benefit of clergy, so early as by th Statute & Eliz. c. 14. But then it must be such a larceny as stands in need of the benefit of clergy, viz of above th value of twelvepence; else the offender shall not have judgm t of death ..... This severity .... seems to be owing to th ease with which such offences are committed, & the difficulty of guarding ag t them: besides that this is an infringem t of property, in the manual possess n occupat n or corporal possess n of the owner, which was an offence even in a state of nature. IV 241. Outlawry may frequently be reversed by writ of error, the proceedings therein being (as it is fit they should be) exceedingly nice & circumstantial; & if any single minute point be omitted or misconducted, th whole outlawry is illegal and may be reversed. IV 315 If J ames Allen, gentleman , is indicted by the name of J ohn Allen, esquire, h may plead that he has the name of James, & not of Joh n; & that he is a gentleman, & not an esquire. And if either fact is found by a Jury, then th indictm t shall be abated. IV 329 Universal maxim of th common law of England, that no man is to be brought into jeopardy of his life, more than once for the same offence. IV 329 On witness is not allowed to convict a man indicted for perjury; because then there is only one oath ag t another. IV 3 51 Sir Matthew Hale.... lays down two rules.. . 1. Never to convict a man for stealing th goods of a person unknown, merely because he will give no account how he came by them, unless an actual felony be proved of such goods: & 2. Never to convict any person of murder or manslaughter, till at least the body be found dead. IV 352
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1