27 May 1808 8

- The case is - that under in this state of things it is in the power of any single individual in the station of Juryman to command a verdict, and there to the conviction of all harbour a false one, thus by the voluntary perjury of one, forcing producing the involuntary perjury eleven others to perjure themselves.

How then is a receipt, nor that one unobvious one

by which any man party who either already proffesses or can continue manages so as to gain a single individual to seek a proper a single individual out of twelve jurymen, may command the verdict. To its other properties this inessential function of the institution adds therefore that of being an incentive encouragement to corruption, and that of the most powerful kind.

A story which current upon this occasion, and the design of which when related has commonly been that of recommending these factors to public favor in the character of a security to the innocent Englishmen's lives, an institution arrangement of the most nation friendly and conducive to the ends of justice, may in this reason true or false, serve the purpose of illustration.

A man is indicted for murder. He is innocent, but by a regular concurrence of circumstances, the evidence, being chiefly of the circumstantial kind bears is known to bear strong against him. By the force influence of the known circumstances The real author of the death is screened from . This concurrence tortures him. One death howsoever produced, sat heavy on it: and now the death of another person, altogether innocent, and with whom he himself had had no quarrel, is about to be added to the load. What (says he to himself) shall I do to save him? - I have hit upon it. &
Similar Items
  • Title: [27 May 1808 4 Dark as are the colours]
    Description: 27 May 1808 4

    Dark as are the colours in which happily inessential

    this part of the institution presents itself to a general and distant

    glance, on a closer inspection they will not be found to brighten: on

    a nearer view

    If the effect of the compulsion are confined

    to the suppression of the opinion of the minority, the majority

    opinion of the constituting the decision as it would do

    of course without the compulsion, here would be the torture,

    here would be the lying here would be the perjury, all of these

    enormities them perfectly useless, but here would not be the

    false verdict with the false judgment

    pronounced in consequence.

    But though it probably is frequently in many

    instances cases it is probably thus unless and not so

    probably in most instances, there can be no apearance of its

    being so in any. If in one point of view the most probable case is that

    the opinion thus declared to be the opinion of all is conformable

    to the opinion of the majority, greater in another point

    of view the most probably case is that it is opposite the opinion of

    the smaller number. Suppose the produced before the

    Justice begins to speak, the probability is that the opinion

    declared is the opinion of the majority: because under these circumstances

    a margin of this or of any other kind is sooner produced

    on the part of a smaller than on the part of a larger greater

    number.

    But suppose the decision verdict to have waited till

    the tribune has had time to operate: now here the

    probability is on the other side: for when torture is to be undergone,

    and on the part of the greater number of

    the patriots the resolution to undergo it produced by the finest

    motives, it is easier to find a smaller than to find a greater number.

    possessed of this and degree of fortitude.
  • Title: [27 May 1808 I will get myself put]
    Description: 27 May 1808

    I will get myself put upon the Jury — I will go with my comrades

    into the withdrawing chamber, and then be the evidence what it will

    may, they shall stay, till

    I have brought men to concurr with me in a verdict of

    not guilty. - and so says the story he died:

    the particulars being afterwards confessed by him on his death-bed.

    Supposing this true, what does it prove? - that when a man is determined

    upon it, it is in his power to make his way into the Jury-box: and

    when he is there, that it is in the power of any man who in any shape

    is actuated by a strong interest to command the of eleven men who by

    the are without interest, needs no proof.

    In this state of things, verdicts contrary to the clearest evidence

    neither naturally can be nor actually are infrequent are not

    infrequent: indeed so far are

    they from being so, that when they do occurr, no mention

    is produced by them. How should it be? The very object of the

    arraignment is to produce perjury: in the effect what is there that should

    call

    In cases not penal the mischief is not altogether without

    remedy. For when purse and perseverance suffice to demand it, new trial is

    sometimes granted.

    But in penalcases and especially in capital new trial is either

    altogether unobtainable, unexampled prohibited by practice

    or extremely rare. False ju verdict

    To the prejudice of the defendants side false verdict might find

    a remedy, is capable of finding a cure or at least a palliative

    in pardon: but to the prejudice of the plaintiff's side, that is to the

    prejudice of public security, violent and false false

    judgment are altogether without remedy.
  • Title: [31 Aug 1804. Collectania Juridicae]
    Description: 31 Aug 1804.

    Collectania Juridicae :Blackstones — H K

    Neither can burglary

    be committed in a

    tent or booth erected

    in a market or fair;

    tho' the owner may

    lodge therein: for the

    law regards thus highly

    nothing but permanent

    edifices.... &

    it is the folly of the

    owner to lodge in so

    fragile a tenement:

    but his lodging there

    no more makes it burglary

    to break it open

    than it wo d be to uncover

    a titled waggon in

    the same circumstances. IV 226

    If a person leaves

    his doors or windows

    open, it is his own

    folly & negligence; &

    if a man enters therein

    it is no burglary: yet,

    if he afterwards unlocks an inner or chamber door it is so. IV 226.

    Of things... that

    adhere to the freehold,

    as corn, grass, trees, &

    the like, or lead upon a

    house, no larceny could be

    committed by the rules

    of the common law; but

    the severance of them

    was, & in many things

    is still, merely a trespass. IV 232.

    But if the thief severs

    them [things that a dhere

    to the freehold] at one

    time, whereby the trespass

    is completed, & they are

    converted into personal

    chattels, in the constructive

    possession of him in

    whose soil they are left

    or laid; & comes again

    at another time, when

    they are so turned into personally,

    & takes them away;

    it is larceny: & so it is, if the

    owner or any one else has revered

    them. IV 233.

    Stealing one out of mines

    is... no larceny, upon

    the same principle of

    adherence to the freehold;

    with an exception only to

    mines of black lead, the

    stealing one out of which

    is felony without benefit

    of clergy. IV 234

    The stealing of writings

    relating to a real

    estate is no felony, but

    a trespass: because they

    concern the land, or ...

    savour of the realty, &

    are considered as part

    of it by law. IV 234

    It is true , that th

    merc y of juries will often

    make them strain a

    point, & bring in larceny

    to be under the value of

    t we lvepence when it is really

    of much greater value:

    but this is a kind of pious per jury. IV 239

    The offence of p rivately

    stealing from a man's person

    .... without his knowledge,

    was debarred of

    th benefit of clergy, so

    early as by th Statute &

    Eliz. c. 14. But then it

    must be such a larceny

    as stands in need of

    the benefit of clergy, viz

    of above th value of

    twelvepence; else the offender

    shall not have

    judgm t of death .....

    This severity .... seems to be

    owing to th ease with

    which such offences are

    committed, & the difficulty

    of guarding ag t them:

    besides that this is an

    infringem t of property,

    in the manual possess n

    occupat n or corporal

    possess n of the owner,

    which was an offence

    even in a state of

    nature. IV 241.

    Outlawry may frequently

    be reversed by writ of error,

    the proceedings therein

    being (as it is fit they

    should be) exceedingly nice

    & circumstantial; & if

    any single minute point

    be omitted or misconducted,

    th whole outlawry

    is illegal and may

    be reversed. IV 315

    If J ames Allen, gentleman ,

    is indicted by the

    name of J ohn Allen,

    esquire, h may plead

    that he has the name

    of James, & not of Joh n;

    & that he is a gentleman,

    & not an esquire. And

    if either fact is found

    by a Jury, then th indictm t

    shall be abated. IV 329

    Universal maxim

    of th common law of

    England, that no man

    is to be brought into

    jeopardy of his life,

    more than once for

    the same offence. IV 329

    On witness is not allowed

    to convict a man

    indicted for perjury; because

    then there is only

    one oath ag t another. IV 3 51

    Sir Matthew Hale....

    lays down two rules.. .

    1. Never to convict a man

    for stealing th goods of

    a person unknown, merely

    because he will give

    no account how he came

    by them, unless an actual

    felony be proved

    of such goods: & 2. Never

    to convict any person of

    murder or manslaughter,

    till at least the body

    be found dead. IV 352