1
results found in
32 ms
Page 1
of 1
1822 Aug. 29
Constitut. Code
1.
In largest sense, corruption, name of an operation denoted change for worse in the condition of the subject it applies to: or result of d o. operations: viz. the deteriorated condition in which the subject is placed: as having been corrupted, and being corrupt the subject is thereupon spoken of.
2.
Corruption, to break up texture, rendering the article less fit for use.
3.
Corruptive influence is the influence of any person of thing operating towards the production of such effect.
4.
Instrument of misrule corruption is a fictitious entity, subordinate agent of that same fictitious entity. So corruptive influence.
5.
Misrule being exercised over community by ruler or rulers, the subject is either person or thing. If person, it may be one over whom, or on by whom the rule is exercised.
6.
Without impropriety, it might on this occasion be applied to ..., those over whom.
7.
More useful the considering it as applied to those by whom. Subject, if a thing the frame or system of Government a fictitious entity employed to denote the wish of those by whom rule is, or those by whom rule has been, exercised.
8.
Effect on which the mischief of every change for the worse consists — of every change by which the Government is rendered less fit for its right and proper use, is the sinister sacrifice above mentioned.
9.
Means, operating or effecting the sacrifice, must in so far as operating on the will be good or evil-operating as temptation or inducement
10.
Without impropriety evil might be supposed and spoken of as thus operating. Say, subordinate a judge, threatened by Chief or Monarch, with death if he will not deliver... from an enemy, and as such belonging to the King, good taken by force at sea from unoffending foreigners.
11.
Without impropriety may in this case corruption be said to have place. 1. By retributive... of the injured foreigner, universal interest sacrificed.
11. contin d.
2. viz. to particular & sinister interest of King thus self... by ... depredation: the fruit adjudged to him by the judge for fear of being killed. Corrupting & corruptive the King corrupted the judge.
12.
But by any such words as the judge has been corrupted by the King in such sort as to enable him to receive and enjoy the pursuit of privacy without incurring all the odium, no such idea would naturally be suggested as that the instrument of the corruption had been the fear of being killed. The hope of being or benefit of having been rewarded for example with a share of the booty is the only sort of inducement which, the word corrupted could naturally be brought to view: viz 1. because... fear of death would not be so clearly disreputable to... 2. because by such... more discontent would be excited than by such remuneration.
12 (a)
1. Not so improbable as some may affect to think, such caucion. In England as in Turkey. Monarch is Master of subjects lives: intimidation of homicide well given, well executed: pardons signed. 2. Widow or orphan might have stood in the way. Act 1821 , removed the obstacle: horror of innovation c d. for such a purpose be surmounted.
12 (a) contin d.
King asked and then received power of killing all his subjects. Sole limit to omnipotence inability of doing wrong when doing it makes it right 3. Men whose lives were thus devoted remained motionless, instead of preventing countless homicides by a few useful ones: motionless like the booty binds. 4. Not so good as passion represented, the bargain made by Lords and Gentlemen when to take security from those they had made enemies they gave up their own the General a King who wants a third wife may have her by making him a... : this is less trouble than setting a man to assassinate or challenge him: but exceptions may arise. A judge may be a coward: a juryman, though packed, perverse ... can never be depended on as or
Similar Items
-
Title: [7 July 1821 Logic Section 5]Description: 7 July 1821 Logic Section 5 Of fictional entities 2 2 An entity, whether perceptible or inferential, is either real or fictitious. A real entity is an entity to which, on the occasion and for the purpose of discourse, existence is really meant to be ascribed. A fictitious entity is an entity to which, though by the grammatical form of the discourse employed in speaking of it, existence be ascribed, yet in truth and reality existence is not meant to be ascribed. Every noun substantive which is not the name of a real entity, perceptible or inferential, is the name of a fictitious entity. Every fictitious entity bears some relation to some real entity, and can no otherwise be understood than in so far as that relation is perceived, - a conception of that relation is obtained. Reckoning from the real entity to which it bears relation, a fictitious entity may be styled a fictitious entity of the first remove, a fictitious entity of the second remove, and so on. A fictitious entity of the first remove is a fictitious entity, a conception of which may be obtained by the consideration of the relation borne by it to a real entity, without need of considering the relation borne by it to any other fictitious entity. A fictitious entity of the second remove is a fictitious entity, for obtaining a conception of which it is necessary to take into consideration some fictitious entity of the first remove. 11
-
Title: [23 Aug. 1814 Logic Ch Paraphrasis]Description: 23 Aug. 1814 Logic Ch Paraphrasis '.1. Explanation 2 2 Of any such fictitious entity, or fictitious entities, the real entity with which the import of their respective appellatives is connected, and on the import of which their import depends, may be termed the real source, efficient cause, or connecting principle. In every proposition by which a property or affection of any kind is ascribed to an entity of any kind, real or fictitious, three parts or members are necessarily either expressly or virtually included, viz. 1. a subject being the name of the real or fictitious entity in question; 2. a predicate by which is designated the property or affection attributed or ascribed to that subject, and 3. the copula or sign of the act of the mind by which the attribution or ascription is performed. By the sort of proposition here in question, viz. a proposition which has for its subject some fictitious entity, and for its predicate the name of an attribute attributed to that fictitious entity, some sort of image - the image of some real action or state of things, in every instance, is presented to the mind. This image may be termed the archetype, emblem, or archetypal image appertaining to the fictitious proposition, of which the name of the characteristic fictitious entity constitutes a part. In so far as of this emblematic image indication is given, the act or operation by which such indication is given, may be termed archetypation. 148
-
Title: [23 Sept. 1814 '.1. Logic Ch]Description: 23 Sept. 1814 '.1. Logic Ch.1. Ontology Entities real fictitious &c. '.1. Entities real & fictitious [...?] 2 2 Chapter 2 Fictitious entity (says some one) of such a locution where can be the sense or use ? By the word entity cannot but be represented something that has existence: apply to the same subject the word /adjunct/ fictitious, the effect is to give instruction that it has not any existence. This, then, is a contradiction in terms, a species of locution from which, in proportion as it has any employment, confusion, and that alone, cannot but be the effect. Entities are either real or fictitious, what can that mean ? What but that of entities there are two species or sorts: viz. one which is itself, and another which is neither itself nor anything else ? Instead of fictitious entity, or as synonymous with fictitious entity why not here say - non-entity ? Answer. Altogether inevitable will this seeming contradiction be found. The root of it is in the nature of language: that instrument without which, though of itself it be nothing, nothing can be said, and scarcely can anything be done. 15
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1