date

18 Sept. 1803 Evidence Instruction
18 Sept. 1803

Evidence

Instruction

Considerations

2. Pecuniary interest

Time

Clearance or

If however it be really supposed, that by any such mechanical process the mind of men can really be cleared of interest, or /and/that the security /probability/ for truth for the absence of incorrectness and mendacity is, after the performance of any such ceremony, in any considerable degree greater than before, the supposition will upon examination be found delusive. Against simple incorrectness it will be found of scarce any use /little or no use/. Against mendacity - against wilful perjury - it will be found of no use at all.

Mendacity, wilful perjury out of the question, any departure from the line of perfect correctness, of absolute /exact/ truth can have no other cause than bias. /come under no other case than that of bias./ Whatever deviation from that line may later place in his testimony, the witness himself is not sensible of any such deviation: if he is, so far as he is, so far is the testimony mendacious, and himself a perjurer. In this case whatever may have been the state of his mental faculties in relation to the facts in question - his perception -his judgment his memory before the operation, it does not seem natural that by the operation any very determinable or material alteration should be produced.

But suppose the bias previously existing and in action and suppose the legal process to have cleared away this sinister interest - this cause of aberation from the line of truth - there is /remains/ another which it is not in the nature of it to clear away, and which /of which the action/ will naturally be more powerful than that of the bias itself. This is his regard for his own character - for his own reputation in respect of veracity, his sensibility to the pains of the moral sanction. Before the time and occasion for the performance of this legal ceremony can have taken place, he will almost always have given his account /statement/ of the affair: it is from /by/ this statement alone that in general the party who has an interest in the restoration of the testimony can obtain that information, from which his inducement to put in practice the expedient for the clearing away the objection was denied. But having once given his account of the matter, the witness is concerned in point of reputation to abide by it; What he has to lose by such departure /were he to depart from it in any considerable degree to depart from it/ by such departure is so much of his reputation as is at stake:
Similar Items
  • Title: [29 June 1803 Evidence Written]
    Description: 29 June 1803

    Evidence

    Written

    §.3. Rules

    After this indication the subject /way/ seems already prepared for the exhibition of /the reception of/ leading[?] rules: the reasons of which will be unfolded in due course.

    Rule 1. On the single score /ground/ of rectitude of decision - i:e: setting aside the regard due to the prevention of delay vexation and expence[?] - testimony /evidence/ of this kind, being unsanctioned and unscrutinized ought in no case to be admitted, where the witness or supposed witness is forthcoming on a condition /known to be forthcoming at any time,/ to have his testimony sanctioned and scrutinized in whatever is predetermined /has been determined/ to be in his case the proper mode. Reason briefly indicated - 1. Inferior evidence would /not to/ be preferred to superior. 2. Danger from the characteristic fraud.

    Rule 2. In this case of any class of witnesses, supposing there to be any such class, in whose /of which/ instance it is predetermined that their testimony may, without any danger worth regarding on this ground, be admitted, although it be without the security of afforded against mendacity and incorrectness by the generally established system of sanction and scrutiny, such testimony may accordingly be admitted in the first instance, on the ground of a saving in point of delay, vexation and expence: subject always to sanction and scrutiny, in case of reasonable and special cause of suspicion shown in respect either of mendacity or incorrectness. - On this ground is to be justified, so far as it is to be justified, the exemption from sanctionment and scrutiny, established in the case of pre-appointed official evidence. See the Chapter on that subject. Reason briefly indicated - absence of the ordinary causes o mendacity and incorrectness.

    Rule 3. Where it is ascertained[?] that the witness or supposed witness can not at any future time be by any possibility be forthcoming for the purpose of sanctionment and scrutiny - (viz: in the case of death or what to this purpose is tantamount to death incurable insanity to a degree rendering him incapable of examination) this species of evidence ought to be admitted: supposing it not to stand excluded by a degree of disadvantage in respect of probable delay, vexation and expence, more than equivalent to the advantage in respect of rectitude of decision, consideration being had of the degree of its relevancy and importance and subject of course to whatever observations it stands exposed to on the ground of /on the score of/ interest and all other grounds of suspicion. [...?] Briefly indicated. The witness being a party to the suit, Fraud not to be presumed: mendacity not so common as veracity: deception by mendacity, if attempted, more likely to fail than to succeed /prevail/ against the causes of suspicion motivated by the instructions. Absence of expectation of profit to be reaped by the characteristic fraud; the falshood not being capable of producing its advantageous consequences /profit/ till the author is no longer in a condition to reap it /the profit/. The witness [...?] [...?] a party. Uncertainty of the time of reaping the profit from the submission[?]: the disgrace and punishment impending all the time,
  • Title: [3 March 1804 Evidence Securities]
    Description: 3 March 1804

    Evidence

    Securities

    Ch. Procedure Technical

    ''. Non-Confrontation

     [...?] This here or under Makeshift. Many Media[?]

    ''.1. Confrontation [...?] justice: abolition of it encourages mendacity by the multiplication of Agents through whom the information is transmitted

    In the established system - in every system in which the truth of the allegation is not supported by the immediate testimony - the [...?] and scrutinized testimony of the party in whose name and on whose behalf it is advanced /made/ - mendacity receives the most adequate encouragement in its enterprises against justice.

    The party say in the first instance the plaintiff tells his story in the first place to the Attorney. The bias which every man has in favour of his own cause is sufficient without conscious mendacity to produce more or less misrepresentation in the instance of privileges the majority of those who under /in/ the existing system come into a Court of law. Quantities are either encreased or diminished - qualities are either too strongly or too faintly coloured - often facts and circumstances that make against a man's wishes, especially if they reflect the /any/ slightest [...?] of disrepute upon his character - are more or less disguised or suppressed.

    The Attorney who has no such /at least no equal/ bias upon his mind, shares not in any degree or at least in equal degree the false conception of his Client. But by the sinister interest constantly attached to his situation he so far from being urged to dispel the falshood and bring the truth to view, he is urgent to thicken it. He has every thing to hope and to gain without any thing to fear by keeping the mask on the falshood, every thing to lose by the removal of it. By extracting the truth from the Client, he loses the benefit at any rate of that one cause: if, in his endeavours /course of/ the operation he happens to give offence to a man the state of whose mind is such as disposes him more or less strongly to take offence, not only the cause is /may be/ lost, but the Client: not only that one cause, but other causes the indefinite train /source/ of other causes that might have flowed from this same source.
  • Title: [6 July 1804 Procedure & Evidence]
    Description: 6 July 1804

    Procedure & Evidence

    Evils causes

    4th order

    '.2 Fallaciousness

    2. Evil the cause of which is sought - -- 2 evil of the 3rd order

    Fallaciousness in this or that article /lot/ of evidence.

    I. Personal evidence and written evidence

    1. Natural causes

    1. Influence of the several causes of incorrectness in testimony: which see.

    2. Influence of the several causes of mendacity and bias in testimony: which see.

    3. Insufficiency of the several causes of veracity: which see.

    II. Factitious causes negative.

    1. Omission on the part of the legislator to require pre-appointed and thence trustworthy evidence in cases that admitt of such pre-appointment: i.e. of a ----- of witnesses /evidence/ to ---- for the proof of a fact before it has taken place. See

    2. Omission on the part of the legislator to make the requisite arrangements for the preserving by registration such evidence as requires to be preserved.

    3. Omission on the part of the legislator to ---- for all cases alike (particular cases /specified cases/ excepted, where the evil of vexation and expence would preponderate) that mode of extracting /extraction/ the evidence which is best calculated for rendering it trustworthy: such alone excepted in which the advantage in point of trustworthiness would not pay for the evil in the shape of delay, vexation & expence.

    III. Factitious causes positive

    3. Positive encouragement given to mendacity by the legislator and under his authority by the judge, in various ways.

    Examples

    1. Facts known to be false alleged by the judge, under the name of fictions for the grounds and reasons of his decision.

    2. Parties /A party/ compelled to exhibit facts notoriously false (also under the name of fiction) on pain of losing his cause.

    3. A party allowed to advantage himself in the course of procedure in various ways, by false allegations, without being punished or prosecuted[?] in any way for the mendacity.  Re---- onwards.