1
results found in
11 ms
Page 1
of 1
3 July 1812
Evidence Introd
Introd
Ch. 23. Technically appropriate
A question belonging to the head of technically appropriate evidence is a question that could not have existence over the rule of action real not imaginary consigned to a determinate form of words, not left to be /instead of being/ expressed by each person in his own words at a venture
Similar Items
-
Title: [3 July 1812 Evidence Introd]Description: 3 July 1812 Evidence Introd Introd Ch. 23. Technically appropriate A question properly belonging to the subject of evidence is a /that sort of/ question of the number of those questions which are equally liable to have place under the law of one political state, as under the law of any other political state: under one body of substantive law as under any other body of substantive law. The questions which under English law as it is /in its present barbarous state/ belong to the head of technically appropriate evidence are questions that could not in the first place be found to have place under the law of any political state but England.
-
Title: [3 July 1812 Evidence Introd]Description: 3 July 1812 Evidence Introd Introd Ch. 23. Technically appropriate '.1. 7. Mode of guarding the breast of the judge from the deception liable to be produced by false and otherwise fallacious evidence. Such are the topics which in respect of their generality presented themselves as [...?] [...?] having a just claim to admission in a work on the subject in general, and in particular such evidence as has for its object a /any/ fact belonging to the class of legally - operative facts.
-
Title: [3 July 1812 Evidence Introd]Description: 3 July 1812 Evidence Introd Introd Ch. 23. Technically '.1. 1. A circumstance that requires to be noted in relation to technically appropriate evidence as above described /distinguished/ is - one circumstance that requires to be noted, is that in all the cases in which a question of this nature occurs the judicatory by which the question has been determined is that of which a Jury is an essentially component part. 2. Another circumstance which at the same time requires to be noted is - that in every one[?] of those cases the authority from which the question has received its decision has been the authority - not of the Jury, but of the permanent and professionally official part of the judicatory - the Judge or Judges
1
results found.
Page 1
of 1