28 May 1812

Evidence

Notes

Introd

Ch. 20 Auth & Deauth.

'.2

(4) { at whose charge} i.e. on whom supposing the genuineness and the validity of it established, the effect would be the imposing of an obligation more or less burthensome in any shape, non-penal or penal absolute or eventual[?], pecuniary or non-pecuniary - pecuniary as in the case of a conveyance or other disposion of property: pecuniary or non-pecuniary, as in the case of an agreement.

The supposition here is - either that with relation to the interest of the party in question the effect of the instrument is either purely burthensome or if it be in part burthensome and in part beneficial that it is in a preponderant degree burthensome, the ballance being on the side of burthensomeness: the case being that genuineness /spuriousness/ is to be used not in /as to/ part only is the vice imported to the instrument. If spuriousness in this or that particular part only as in case of falsification be the vice imported /suspected/, in that case while the operation of the unfalsified part is at his charge the operation of the falsified part may be to whose /his/ benefit or vice versâ.

In the account /estimate/ taken /examination made/ of the effect of the instrument upon the interest of the party and thence /in that respect/ upon the probative force of his testimony the whole /the effect/ together must be taken into the account.

In so far as the operation of the instrument is at the charge of the party in question, the probative force of his testimony in forms of the genuineness of of the instrument is greater although he is a party, or rather for that very reason because he is a party interested - his being in that way interested than that of an extraneous witness can be supposing the witness to be altogether without interest in either side: for by the supposition not being exposed to the action of any sinister interest acting on him in such a direction as to [...?] him to depose in favour /affirmation/ of the genuineness of the instrument, it follows that if so it be that he does depose in affirmation of it, his deposition to that effect can have had no other cause than his sensibility and obsequiousness to the action of these tutelary motives which under the denomination of the general efficient cause of correctness and compleatness and thence of trustworthiness as evidence have been already enumerated and explained. In. Ch.
Similar Items
  • Title: [12 Jan y 1814 Jug True Ch.5]
    Description: 12 Jan y 1814

    Jug True

    Ch.5. II Prophecies [...?]

    2

    §.2. Prophecies

    2

    If in itself a miracle at large—meaning always a report made of a miracle, a report made or supposed to be made at an anterior and very remote point of time, is in its MS alt. ‘not’. own nature incapable of affording any sufficient proof of the verity of any religious system, no less incapable of serving in that character is every thing that has ever been brought forward in that character under the name of a prophecy—i.e. a miraculous prediction a prediction of the miraculous kind.

    Not miraculous or miraculous—to one or other of these classes will every discourse be seen to belong which ever has been or ever can be held up to view in the character of a prophecy. If it be not miraculous, it then amounts to nothing: the condition in which its probative force depends is altogether wanting. If it be miraculous, then by this its alledged miraculousness a more strongly probative proof is afforded of its spuriousness than any that can be found to operate in favour of its genuineness. In the supposition of its spuriousness —i.e. of its not having been in fact delivered at the time when (as alledged)/ it was delivered, by the person by whom (as alledged) it was delivered—there can not be any thing in any degree unconformable to the notoriously ordinary course of nature: whereas in the supposition of its genuineness, it being by the same supposition of the miraculous cast in this supposition is included ex [...?] that of no unconformableness to the ordinary course of nature.
  • Title: [28 May 1812 Evidence Notes]
    Description: 28 May 1812

    Evidence

    Notes.

    Introd

    Ch. 20 Auth & Deauth

    View[?] of [...?] interrogation - descriptions[?] [...?] more [...?] or more frequent [...?] is but interest which being [...?] every where an appearance [...?] [...?] is one or the opposite side when not the object of [...?] it [...?] not be the subject of interrogation

    (5) {A non-party} In the scale of probative force the testimony of a party in the case where by deposing in affirmation[?] of the genuineness of the instrument he would speak against himself i.e. against his own interest is here distinguished from and placed above that of a non-party whose relation to the fact in question in respect of interest is of the same nature and on the same side. But for the /Had it not been/ established practice and established notions this distinction would have been of no use would have had no use would scarcely have been worth bringing into notice holding up to view. On the question of its force or virtue[?] - not upon the source from whence it is derived depends on the occasion of testimony as on any other occasion the effective influence of interest on human agency /conduct/. the influence exerted by interest and the effects produced by it.

    By interest to any degree of strength antecedently to the time of deposition its influence the existence of which is neither seen /visible/ nor so much as suspected /open to suspicion/ of the existence of which no external marks are visible may have exercised /been exercising/ the effective influence may have been exercised. From the colouring exhibited by the testimony as it is at the time of delivery as from the brieff it flows /makes it way through/ through the lips and countenance and tone of voice of the deponent interest may be indicated by marks /tokens/ more than any which can be collected either from any mass of punishment of from the situation /any relation/ which the individual can be seen to occupy /stand in/ with reference to the cause. By English Lawyers it is only in one shape /one species/ viz that of pecuniary interest that interest is understood to be capable of exercising upon testimony a corruptive influence /giving to testimony a sinister direction/: and thus[?] of the great variety of shapes in which interest is capable of exercising in a sinister direction a [...?] influence, one only viz that of pecuniary interest is recognized as powerful enough to [...?] for the overcoming of it the application of three [...?] means viz. exclusion which alone are considered by them as adapted to the purpose: and even in this single shape it may be operating in any one or more of a thousand shapes /ways/ in a case in which no suspicion of its existence has been produced by any exterior indications by by which no exterior indications capable of giving birth to suspicion, are afforded.
  • Title: [3 July 1812 Evidence Introd]
    Description: 3 July 1812

    Evidence Introd

    Introd

    Ch. 23. Technically appropriate

    In the instance of all these several topics, so extensive is the field to which they every one of them have application, scarce any need or occasion has there been /small indeed has been the occasion which there has been/ to make any particular species of fact in the character of the subject matter of the evidence: and where there has, extensive to a prodigious degree of amplitude has been the species of fact thus brought to view.

    Under the head of circumstantial evidence for example 1. any matter of fact whatever belonging to the class of physical facts - 2. any matter of fact whatever belonging to the class of psychological facts. 3. On the occasion of a series of [...?] action directed to any one common end, among the matters of fact to which such series of action have given birth any which occupying in the order of time a station anterior to this or that other matter of fact considered as evidentiary of it; and vice versa. 4. human delinquency, in whatsoever shape manifested or operating: 5. on the occasion of a script exhibited in the character either of an instrument of contract or a script at large, the genuineness or spuriousness of the script.

    Such in every instance is the amplitude, the prodigious amplitude of the only species of facts which in the occasion /in the course/ of a work having for its subject evidence in general or legally operative evidence in general it seemed necessary or proper to bring to view.